Will 21.5 Brushless be the new stock?
12-06-2016, 04:00 PM
#32
Tech Regular
I remember when there were actually good turnouts at big events... we ran "stock" and "mod" (maybe a 19t class). Now there is VTA, USGT, amateur, stock, super stock and mod. Do we really need 6 touring car based classes?
I think it's fine to make 21.5 the new stock. If people complain enough that it's too slow maybe they will step up and start running mod. Actually I think they should make 25.5 the new stock!
I think it's fine to make 21.5 the new stock. If people complain enough that it's too slow maybe they will step up and start running mod. Actually I think they should make 25.5 the new stock!
12-06-2016, 04:06 PM
#33
That's a common debate, coming back years after years... Did a US club never consider doing the opposite? I mean putting everybody in the same class? Here we have only 13.5 boosted, and people are reasonable enough to run at the speed they can pilot. We have example of rookies starting blinky with 5° of turbo and finishing in B main juste because some pilots just overestimates their skills...
12-06-2016, 04:10 PM
#34
I remember when there were actually good turnouts at big events... we ran "stock" and "mod" (maybe a 19t class). Now there is VTA, USGT, amateur, stock, super stock and mod. Do we really need 6 touring car based classes?
I think it's fine to make 21.5 the new stock. If people complain enough that it's too slow maybe they will step up and start running mod. Actually I think they should make 25.5 the new stock!
I think it's fine to make 21.5 the new stock. If people complain enough that it's too slow maybe they will step up and start running mod. Actually I think they should make 25.5 the new stock!
12-06-2016, 04:15 PM
#36
12-06-2016, 04:20 PM
#38
12-06-2016, 04:21 PM
#39
Could always consider making the cars, tires, and drivers better to handle the speed. Just a thought 
12-06-2016, 04:28 PM
#44
Tech Fanatic
I was having this conversation this morning with a Buddy of mine. He hit me with why make a 21.5 and 25.5 TC class when we already have USGT and USVTA? He basically feels if 17.5 TC is to fast you should run these classes. Instead of making new TC classes.
I would like to hear how others feel about this. USGT is 21.5 and USVTA is 25.5 already so why make two new TC classes that could potentially destroy these classes. Or do you all feel that's not the case?
I would like to hear how others feel about this. USGT is 21.5 and USVTA is 25.5 already so why make two new TC classes that could potentially destroy these classes. Or do you all feel that's not the case?
