Will 21.5 Brushless be the new stock?
#363
Remember when brushless was introduced? In the 2 years afterward we had almost the ESC of the month to get. In this war of getting the latest stuff people were tired to buy anything to keep up. I know for a lot of people the interest of a national competition was low. Then came the need of zero timing which is still widely used today.
My opinion for a stock class is that it needs to be equal and fair and sadly (for you) that comes with a bunch of rules. Rules that does not hurt the experience of real racing.
#364
Tech Master
iTrader: (6)
This is what I hear a lot, but is it?
Remember when brushless was introduced? In the 2 years afterward we had almost the ESC of the month to get. In this war of getting the latest stuff people were tired to buy anything to keep up. I know for a lot of people the interest of a national competition was low. Then came the need of zero timing which is still widely used today.
My opinion for a stock class is that it needs to be equal and fair and sadly (for you) that comes with a bunch of rules. Rules that does not hurt the experience of real racing.
Remember when brushless was introduced? In the 2 years afterward we had almost the ESC of the month to get. In this war of getting the latest stuff people were tired to buy anything to keep up. I know for a lot of people the interest of a national competition was low. Then came the need of zero timing which is still widely used today.
My opinion for a stock class is that it needs to be equal and fair and sadly (for you) that comes with a bunch of rules. Rules that does not hurt the experience of real racing.
#365
Tech Adept
iTrader: (6)
Keeping the number of classes down also keeps cost down. We need to stop requesting a ridiculous number of different motors from manufacturers. If the difference on track is 1/2 second with a change of 4 turns, as described in one of the first post in thread, then a 25.5 AND 21.5 class is unnecessary. I defy anybody to tell which is which without a stopwatch unless they are on track together.
I say there should be a 25.5 class and then maybe a 17.5 before going to unlimited. After all, racing is about driver skill, not mechanical superiority
I say there should be a 25.5 class and then maybe a 17.5 before going to unlimited. After all, racing is about driver skill, not mechanical superiority
#366
Tech Regular
iTrader: (47)
This is what I hear a lot, but is it?
Remember when brushless was introduced? In the 2 years afterward we had almost the ESC of the month to get. In this war of getting the latest stuff people were tired to buy anything to keep up. I know for a lot of people the interest of a national competition was low. Then came the need of zero timing which is still widely used today.
My opinion for a stock class is that it needs to be equal and fair and sadly (for you) that comes with a bunch of rules. Rules that does not hurt the experience of real racing.
Remember when brushless was introduced? In the 2 years afterward we had almost the ESC of the month to get. In this war of getting the latest stuff people were tired to buy anything to keep up. I know for a lot of people the interest of a national competition was low. Then came the need of zero timing which is still widely used today.
My opinion for a stock class is that it needs to be equal and fair and sadly (for you) that comes with a bunch of rules. Rules that does not hurt the experience of real racing.
#367
#369
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
At the same time, prohibit:
skewed stators;
non-symmetrical pole laminations;
built-in dynamic timing;
and whatever else we can think of that isn't yet done, but could be.
#370
At some point, the line has to be drawn in the sand. The sooner the better. If it needs to be 57-ish milliohms terminal resistance at 25C to match the new motors, then let's do it and end this nonsense.
At the same time, prohibit:
skewed stators;
non-symmetrical pole laminations;
built-in dynamic timing;
and whatever else we can think of that isn't yet done, but could be.
At the same time, prohibit:
skewed stators;
non-symmetrical pole laminations;
built-in dynamic timing;
and whatever else we can think of that isn't yet done, but could be.