Community
Wiki Posts
Search

just a thought, why is?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2014, 12:14 PM
  #1  
am
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,842
Default just a thought, why is?

Just thought of something;

You have all theese engine gurus out there witch does very good work. Ports can be altered, cranktimes can be altered, combustionchamber can be altered, pretty much evrything exept, metalurgy and to some extent, crankcase volume, so:

If it is only timings balance factor of the crank and combustion chamber, why is there still some engines giving better torque or higher rpm than others.? It must come down to metalurgy, well comrod length is something that is not so easy to alter..
am is offline  
Old 11-30-2014, 07:43 PM
  #2  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 6,278
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by am
Just thought of something;

You have all theese engine gurus out there witch does very good work. Ports can be altered, cranktimes can be altered, combustionchamber can be altered, pretty much evrything exept, metalurgy and to some extent, crankcase volume, so:

If it is only timings balance factor of the crank and combustion chamber, why is there still some engines giving better torque or higher rpm than others.? It must come down to metalurgy, well comrod length is something that is not so easy to alter..
Its a combination of everything that you mentioned, its not one component. Its also designer philosophy, where on the power band the designer wants the power to be made. I do believe that the metallurgy of the piston plays a role...
nitrodude is offline  
Old 12-01-2014, 02:40 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
DS Motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,448
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

The tolerances and materials used are a lot more important into making a really fast engine.
How the bearings are aligned in the crankcase, how much the bearings are compressed in the crankcase, is the piston/sleeve absolutely perpendicular to the crankshaft.
If you have a good crankcase it's worth it to keep rebuilding it, it can make a pretty big difference.

All the polishing and grinding is mostly useless show stuff which only destroys the fuel consumption.
DS Motorsport is offline  
Old 12-01-2014, 03:58 PM
  #4  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,336
Default

Most important is a perfect match of the expansion rates of the piston and sleeve so the perfect fit is secure with a large window of temperature. (In the Fusion-X topic special team pistons are mentioned)
We have played a lot with different piston materials in a non changed sleeve and you can notice a lot in difference. If they do not match a lot you will notice a variable power/performance.

Perfect alignment and low tolerances probably taken from the first batch after renwing all toolbits and a fresh alignment. And maybe also on made a lower speed or more steps to get a lower tolerance and a better alignment.

A better combustion chamber, for sure when it is optimised to the altitude of the event to get the lowest possible head clearance.

And there are different carburator needles to get a better performance.

If you are a manufacturer and do want to have the best for your top driver(s) you can think of everything high tech like F1 crankshaft steel which is light and can be made lighter and balanced perfectly. Low friction bushings, special high grade bearings, berylium pistons etc.
Sounds to advanced but it is possible...
Roelof is online now  
Old 12-04-2014, 01:01 PM
  #5  
Anf
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
If you are a manufacturer and do want to have the best for your top driver(s) you can think of everything high tech like F1 crankshaft steel which is light and can be made lighter and balanced perfectly. Low friction bushings, special high grade bearings, berylium pistons etc.
Sounds to advanced but it is possible...
F1 crankshaft steel?
Perfect balance...single cylinder?

You can make things work within limitations...there will always be a compromise...you can not have the best of everything.
Anf is offline  
Old 12-04-2014, 02:10 PM
  #6  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,336
Default

True that a single cilinder is not easy to balance but balancing seems important, Picco also did make a step in performance by adding balance weights.

Yes, there is a special steel used for the crankshafts in F1 engines, it is very tough and light material. It needs a hardening proces in several steps to get the best out of it but then you have the best crankshaft you can imagine. An 14mm crankshaft can be easy drilled out to 12mm or even larger.

To think very extreme you could even use a high grade titanium

(btw, a titanium rod is not lighter but is unbreakable)
Roelof is online now  
Old 12-04-2014, 04:47 PM
  #7  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 6,278
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
True that a single cilinder is not easy to balance but balancing seems important, Picco also did make a step in performance by adding balance weights.

Yes, there is a special steel used for the crankshafts in F1 engines, it is very tough and light material. It needs a hardening proces in several steps to get the best out of it but then you have the best crankshaft you can imagine. An 14mm crankshaft can be easy drilled out to 12mm or even larger.

To think very extreme you could even use a high grade titanium

(btw, a titanium rod is not lighter but is unbreakable)
But it can be made lighter while maintaining the same strength as the aluminum one. The problem is that titanium doesn't like heat...
nitrodude is offline  
Old 12-04-2014, 10:54 PM
  #8  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,336
Default

No, it can not be made lighter, Titanium has more flex than aluminium and flex in the rod is not good.
Roelof is online now  
Old 12-05-2014, 07:55 AM
  #9  
Anf
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
True that a single cilinder is not easy to balance but balancing seems important, Picco also did make a step in performance by adding balance weights.

Yes, there is a special steel used for the crankshafts in F1 engines, it is very tough and light material. It needs a hardening proces in several steps to get the best out of it but then you have the best crankshaft you can imagine.
Would I be right to think that any engine will require a different balance factor to operate optimally pertaining to the rpm?
An engine with low timing made to create torque will require a different balance compared to a screamer?

Have you got any more in-depth information about the F1 steel please?
Anf is offline  
Old 12-05-2014, 10:49 AM
  #10  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,336
Default

Yes, every amount of unbalanced weight has its own frequency because the combustion stroke is making the throttle depending counterweight.

I can not tell a lot about that steel. My sponsor could get an hand on a small piece trough contacts in the motorsports. All I know it komes with a huge spec sheet and manual how to treat it.
Roelof is online now  
Old 12-05-2014, 02:30 PM
  #11  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
DS Motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,448
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Anf
Would I be right to think that any engine will require a different balance factor to operate optimally pertaining to the rpm?
An engine with low timing made to create torque will require a different balance compared to a screamer?

Have you got any more in-depth information about the F1 steel please?
A single cilinder engine can only be fully balanced for one specific rpm.
Ofcourse you can get quite close for a certain range, limiting vibrations as much as possible. This is what's being done at the moment.

There are several steels used for high end crankshafts.

I believe they first used a maraging steel, but this is now banned to save costs.
http://www.smithshp.com/metals/maraging-steels.htm#

Right now they basically use a very high quality tool steel which is hardened by nitrating it.
I know this company supplies steels which are used by most F1 teams:
http://www.bohler-edelstahl.com/engl...5_ENG_HTML.php
DS Motorsport is offline  
Old 12-14-2014, 03:10 PM
  #12  
Anf
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by DS Motorsport
There are several steels used for high end crankshafts.

I believe they first used a maraging steel, but this is now banned to save costs.
http://www.smithshp.com/metals/maraging-steels.htm#

Right now they basically use a very high quality tool steel which is hardened by nitrating it.
I know this company supplies steels which are used by most F1 teams:
http://www.bohler-edelstahl.com/engl...5_ENG_HTML.php
Thank you for the links.
Anf is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.