Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree164Likes

Tamiya TB Evo 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2015, 10:04 AM
  #946  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
rtypec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,978
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

My Evo6 has been somewhat competitive in all the races it's entered... That being said pick your favorite anodizing color and go with that
rtypec is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 03:27 PM
  #947  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: santa monica / manchester
Posts: 1,426
Default

The evo6 is good in Blinky 17.5 but if you intend to go with a faster motor I would consider a belt car such as the TRF419. The Evo is really nice to drive, I and the other guys I know with them have had no issues with the car other than the c-hubs are not that strong (You can run the 418 ones instead, or just buy the square versions).

Out of the two, I would say the 419 is overall a better car due to its versatility with quicker motors, but the Evo 6 black edition can be bought for a good price if you look around.
Qatmix is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 09:04 PM
  #948  
Tech Elite
 
niznai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: All over the place
Posts: 2,974
Default

Originally Posted by Hinecken
Big thanks for all the honest replies. I was afraid the fanboys would jump in and tell me Tamiya or bust regardless of the truth. You on-road guys are a different breed than what I'm used to 👍👍😜😬
You chose your posting times wisely to avoid that kind of answers. Those people sleep when you post. I am at the antipodes hence my answers are upside down to theirs.
niznai is offline  
Old 07-08-2015, 09:10 PM
  #949  
Tech Elite
 
niznai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: All over the place
Posts: 2,974
Default

Originally Posted by vivo quevas
I have both aTB04 and a EVO6 and I would not recommend a TB04 to anyone this car is slow in USGT or VTA it was several tenths off the pace. I race a EVO6 in USGT very competitive even a TB03 is a better race car.
I have 2 of those metal drive gears for a EVO6 or a TB04 if anyone wants to buy them.

What would be the main differences that cause that, in your experience?

In asking that I consider the main complaints levelled at the Evo6 here, regarding the gear mesh, the drivetrain, the chassis flex and coupling problems with the rear drive, gear casing misalignments and so on. Are these problems present on the TB04 as well?
niznai is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 06:57 AM
  #950  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy_w_beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 73
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I built an early TB04 PRO (first version, not the PRO II), and it took a good amount of time to shim and test fit all gears for optimum mesh (center gears, front/rear pinion/rings, internal spider gears). Just building it per kit instructions looks like a recipe for frustration because the gears float on the shafts too much. You have to understand bevel gear design and pitch cone apex positioning to get it just right.

The chassis (glass-filled nylon, not carbon-reinforced) was badly warped and I followed CraigMBA's lead, using a heat gun, clamps, and a flat surface to straighten it out.

Even with the chassis (mostly) flattened, I still had a very small amount of binding between the center transmission shaft and rear gearbox input shaft until I installed the rear chassis stiffeners. It's not binding, but very close to it.

For some reason the gearbox casings on the "A" parts tree were not molded well, and the outdrive bearings floated up and down (but not fore/aft) a fraction of a millimeter. I had to add some thin tape to take up the gap. The spare "A" parts tree I bought to rebuild my TB03 was even worse and required more attention. I don't know if they had a bad run of parts, if the molds are getting old, or what.

The rest of the kit went together pretty well. No complaints about the suspension - the PRO I uses the same parts as TB03/TA05V2/TRF416/TRF417. The steering uses ball bearings throughout; there are no flange tubes like the TB03 -- this is a huge improvement. The dampers and towers are still very nice.

From building an early TB04 PRO my impression is TB04s require special attention to get the most out of them. Based on casually following this thread for the past year, it sounds like the same care has to go into building a TB EVO 6 as well. Shimming all gears, dealing with gear box molding imperfections (maybe?), and eliminating some center/rear shaft binding are all needed. On the plus side, it looks like the chassis plates are perfectly flat, and the EVO 6 motor mount gives you more gearing options than the TB04.

My build thread: http://www.tamiyaclub.com/forum/inde...howtopic=75566
speedy_w_beans is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 02:23 PM
  #951  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by niznai
That comparison aside, in classes up to 13.5 (talking blinky here) I think the old Yokomo SD SSG would still give the Evo6/TB04 a good run for the money if not beat it outright. I run one of these (amongst many other oddities) in 21.5 and despite my 100g weight penalty, I still make the top three (agains modern belt cars like BD7 and Xray) so there you go. Not that you'd be able to find an SSG nowadays (though you'd really stray form the herd if you did).

Ultimately, hey, if you wanna give it a go, why the hell not? Get the Evo6 and show them what you're made of!
Wait did someone mention Tommy Kramer??

robk is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 05:50 PM
  #952  
Tech Elite
 
niznai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: All over the place
Posts: 2,974
Default

Yeah, that 3mm chassis was probably designed for foam.

What chassis is that? Looks like an SD, but with alloy bulkheads, did Yokomo make those?
niznai is offline  
Old 07-09-2015, 08:54 PM
  #953  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
JimmyMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC
Posts: 4,447
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Yeah. LCG had those bulkheads.
JimmyMac is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 02:19 PM
  #954  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: France
Posts: 7
Default

My 2 cents contribution...

I own a TB-04R and TB evo6 black, and I found the TB-04R easier to drive right out the box than the evo6. Evo6 rear is stepping out more unpredictably...still trying to fix that...

Otherwise gears are working pretty well for the time being, only issue I had is evo6 front diff direct drive bevel which died fast under heavy braking. I found bevel bearings a bit loose in diff case, so I added a turn of office tape around them and then its working like charm

To come back to EVO6/04r comparison, the sound of the 04r gear train is much more smoother and silent... Anyway love both cars !
starefly is offline  
Old 07-22-2015, 03:52 PM
  #955  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 2
Default

Is there any glass fiber o FRP chassis for the Tamiya TB EVO 6. Thanks
xaratu is offline  
Old 08-21-2015, 10:01 PM
  #956  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: taiwan
Posts: 29
Default

20T bevel gear dust cover.
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TB Evo 6-1440219643719.jpg  
e58105419 is offline  
Old 08-22-2015, 11:01 PM
  #957  
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (75)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,329
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Why would you want an FRP chassis? The stock chassis is already really soft.
Dan is offline  
Old 08-29-2015, 12:57 PM
  #958  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: France
Posts: 7
Default

Exotek upgrade coming in
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TB Evo 6-exotek.jpg  
starefly is offline  
Old 08-30-2015, 12:44 AM
  #959  
Tech Adept
 
Aitutaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Austria
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by starefly
Exotek upgrade coming in
What will be the advantage?
Aitutaki is offline  
Old 08-30-2015, 05:43 AM
  #960  
OVA
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
OVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 10,305
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Aitutaki
What will be the advantage?
More Batteries adjustment forward and back ,I think the motor is farther back than stock motor mount..narrow bottm chassis .less gears noise..
OVA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.