Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Countersinking parts: pros and cons >

Countersinking parts: pros and cons

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Countersinking parts: pros and cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2005, 06:54 PM
  #1  
Tech Rookie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 7
Default Countersinking parts: pros and cons

Greetings everyone,

I have a query regarding countersinking the front and rear shock towers and upper deck on my on and off road cars. What are the benefits (or cons) of doing this as so far I have had different opinons ranging from 'it will secure the parts a little better' to 'it will weaken the parts'. I have noticed that certain pro drivers have their parts countersunk but others don't so I am not sure if it is worth me getting it done unless there are benefits (besides the fact that it looks alot cooler).
If anyone could offer some insight on this topic, it would be greatly appreciated.

Thankyou and take care.
bateman is offline  
Old 03-13-2005, 12:07 AM
  #2  
Tech Rookie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 7
Default

Greetings everyone,

Does no one have any information regarding the above post? Any input would be muchly appreciated.

Thankyou and take care.
bateman is offline  
Old 03-13-2005, 09:24 AM
  #3  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: farmington, mi
Posts: 695
Default

well iknow the underside of a chassis will definily be better off countersunk. other places, i dont care at all.
greencactus3 is offline  
Old 03-13-2005, 09:26 AM
  #4  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
burbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 1,152
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

it has nothing to do with performance.. the bottom of the chassis yes.. is so you have no drag.. anywhere eles on the car, it is the choice of the maker to do what they choose.. IT doesnt matter
burbs is offline  
Old 03-13-2005, 11:00 AM
  #5  
sg1
Tech Elite
iTrader: (79)
 
sg1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,262
Trader Rating: 79 (100%+)
Default

Hey bateman,
I think it does matter where you countersink at. Esp. if you do it yourself. You wont be able to put the countersink on the exact location needed, unless you have the print of the part and are using a mill. If the countersink location walks .010" you'll put a nice "tweek" in your chassis if you do a top brace. Same goes for a-arm mounts, shock mounts, etc. You need to do it correctly or you're causing a problem. Just my 2 cents...
Wayne
sg1 is offline  
Old 03-13-2005, 09:59 PM
  #6  
Tech Elite
 
Speedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,433
Default

Originally posted by burbs
it has nothing to do with performance.. the bottom of the chassis yes.. is so you have no drag.. anywhere eles on the car, it is the choice of the maker to do what they choose.. IT doesnt matter
No, it does matter, a lot. Countersinking does a whole lot to stop a car tweaking due to the part moving in relation to the screw. This is why most top decks are countersunk.
Speedo is offline  
Old 03-14-2005, 12:18 AM
  #7  
Tech Adept
 
rovic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: az
Posts: 136
Default

Originally posted by Speedo
No, it does matter, a lot. Countersinking does a whole lot to stop a car tweaking due to the part moving in relation to the screw. This is why most top decks are countersunk.
how does it stop tweek?

it really doest increase surface contact enough to make a differance.

correct me if im wrong, but tweek occurs when the chassie twists, under the screw. chassie doest move back and forth or side to side on the screw, the screw hole prevents that type of movement.
rovic is offline  
Old 03-14-2005, 04:24 AM
  #8  
sg1
Tech Elite
iTrader: (79)
 
sg1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,262
Trader Rating: 79 (100%+)
Default

I can see where the counter sinking the top deck or brace would help with the stiffness and help prevent movement in a hard crash, but I would rather have a button head there. Reason being, during the prototype work on the BMI 1/12 car Jason from BMI noticed there was a variation in the countersinks, heads, and concentricity of the 4-40 flat heads. We would put the main chassis brace on and the chassis and it would twist and be tweeked. There needs to be some room for the inconsistancy of the screws, standoffs and locations on the graphite. If everything in the world was 100% accurate It would be fine, but it's not, so room for error is needed. Maybe because of the smaller size standoffs and thinner graphite pieces for 1/12 it's more critical. But we did have a lot of problem trying to use flat heads there.
Wayne
sg1 is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.