Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread >

Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree172Likes

Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 12-21-2016, 08:46 AM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Kyosho Ultima RB6 & RB6.6 Car Thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: tobamiester
RB6.6 Kyosho America Product Page: http://www.kyoshoamerica.com/ULTIMA-...T_p_24505.html

RB6.6 Manual http://www.kyosho.com/jpn/support/in...A_RB6_6_IM.pdf

RB6.6 Kyosho Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vW_sR667utY

MSRP $639 MAP $399.99

-------------------------------
New RB6.6 parts (compared exploded views, prices and links are Kyosho America):

Chassis:
  1. Main chassis - UM731 - $125.99
  2. Side guards - UM732 - $9.99

Battery Holder:
  1. Battery plate - UM733 - $8.99
  2. Battery foam - UM741 - $7.99

Rear Bulkheads:
  1. MM3 and Laydown - UM740 - $9.99
    • MM3 bulkhead
    • Laydown bulkhead
    • Swaybar Holders

3 Gear Transmission (MM and RM):
  1. Transmission - UM734 - $10.99
    • transmission cases
    • spacers
    • caps
    • plastic FR & RR suspension hangers

  2. Gear Cover - UM735 - $6.99

Laydown Transmission (3 and 4 gear possible):
  1. Transmission - UM736 - $10.99
    • transmission cases
    • spacers
    • caps
    • required extra hardware
    • pastic FR suspension hanger

  2. 40T idler - UM737 - $6.99
  3. Motor plate - UM738 - $18.99
  4. Gear cover - UM739 - $6.99

Body:
  1. Blade body - UMB05 - $27.99

Optional Parts:
  1. Lightweigt Blade body - UMB05LW - $31.99
  2. Aluminum FR suspension hanger - UMW705B - $28.99 (may be able to file UMW705 to fit)
  3. Brass FR suspension hanger - UMW725B - $30.99 (looks more different than UMW725..someone confirm?)

Typical Upgrades for new RB6.6 Buyers

UMW701 Aluminum Steering Plate (RB6)
UMW702 Aluminum Crank Arm (RB6)
UMW704-0 V2 Aluminum Rear Hub Set(0°/RB6)
UMW705B Aluminum Rear Sus. Holder (RF/RB6.6) or brass UMW725B
UMW707 Aluminum Rear Sus. Holder (RR-Mid)

Nice to have:

UMW723 Aluminum Front Sus Block (Type B/10g/RB6/RT6/SC6).


Aftermarket Parts:

Front Wing: https://www.prolineracing.com/perfor...mount-alum-rb6

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2013, 05:09 PM
  #6271  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
BennyBagems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hobart, Australia
Posts: 774
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Hi guys, I'll be switching to an RB6 from a DEX210 soon, will the 210 hex rears fit on the RB6 OK?
I still have a heap of tyres mounted I would like to use before I change over to kit wheels.
Thanks.
BennyBagems is offline  
Old 04-18-2013, 05:11 PM
  #6272  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

No they are 12mm
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 04-18-2013, 06:09 PM
  #6273  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 315
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

When you add washers behind the ball studs on the steering rack, are you adding Ackerman? Or taking it out?
Dale.0 is offline  
Old 04-19-2013, 09:54 AM
  #6274  
E73
Tech Adept
iTrader: (3)
 
E73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 131
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dale.0
When you add washers behind the ball studs on the steering rack, are you adding Ackerman? Or taking it out?
I've been trying to figure this out as well. This is the best information I've found on this subject: petitrc.com/setup/associated/setupb4/B4_CharliePerezSetupHints.htm

Increasing ackerman (front wheel angle difference is increased) mellows the steering and is accomplished by reversing the steering bell crank and putting the ball studs back in facing the stock direction. This effectively moves the position of the ball studs back a millimeter or two.

Decreasing ackerman (front wheel angle is similar) makes the car more aggressive and is accomplished by adding spacers under the bell crank ball studs.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
E73 is offline  
Old 04-20-2013, 07:55 PM
  #6275  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Byron Center, Michigan
Posts: 109
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default RB-6

Thinking out loud here. When I get to a track that I know or to a new track, the first thing I do is test tires. Primarily looking for max rear traction and good side bite. I usually use a front tire that I know will push as to not interfere with the selection of the rear tire. Once set on rear tire, I try different front tires til I am satisfied or run out of time. Most times I end up changing to a front tire with less traction than the max traction tire that I have.

I also will play with roll center on the rear for traction and side bite, generally don't play with anti-squat.

My question is: maybe I should start using the front tire with more traction than I like and start tuning the front of the car to take traction out versus changing to a tire with less traction.

I would be interested to hear some other opinions/thoughts on this.

Turbo
Turbo911 is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 09:24 AM
  #6276  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Posts: 1,570
Default

Anyone run a protek servo in their RB6? If so, what model did you get?
JiuHaWong is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 09:30 AM
  #6277  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (47)
 
K_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,234
Trader Rating: 47 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by E73
I've been trying to figure this out as well. This is the best information I've found on this subject: petitrc.com/setup/associated/setupb4/B4_CharliePerezSetupHints.htm

Increasing ackerman (front wheel angle difference is increased) mellows the steering and is accomplished by reversing the steering bell crank and putting the ball studs back in facing the stock direction. This effectively moves the position of the ball studs back a millimeter or two.

Decreasing ackerman (front wheel angle is similar) makes the car more aggressive and is accomplished by adding spacers under the bell crank ball studs.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Putting a shim behind the stud on the RB6 will increase steering by decreasing ackerman. The B4 has 2 holes, forward and back. Going to the back will mellow the steering. The way you can achieve this is installing the ballstud on the other side, but I would run a low mount ballstud if you were going to do that.

I've run both 1mm shim and 0, and I like 0 the best for my track.
K_King is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 11:49 AM
  #6278  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (47)
 
K_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,234
Trader Rating: 47 (100%+)
Default

So I ran my second car that I built as MM for the 1st time yesterday in a race. Wow. Our track is indoors, but it's not exactly high bite. Medium bite would be describe it, and it can be loose so it was going to be interesting to see if it would work.

I had never run a mid motor car before, and I have a bit of work on it to make it better, but essentially I took my rear motor car setup and tossed it on this with some adjustments, but the base is the same.

I was able to run my fastest laps with MM, ran more consistent, jumped better, and was overall smoother than I had been with my RM car. I TQ'd and won the 7 min main by a good margin.

My RM car was good, but there's something to be said about how a MM car drives without feeling like you have to drive hard to get a really good lap time.

Here's how I made the car config wise. I am going to try saddle packs eventually, but I need to figure out how they are mounting them.

I did have to modify the rear motor guard to move the battery back further back, and the braces look a little tweaked because of it (the holes are actually not made for the braces so it stretches it a bit, the battery doesn't move though. Just looks goofy.)



Here is my setup

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...Motor_SDRC.pdf

Phone friendly JPG version
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...Motor_SDRC.jpg

Last edited by K_King; 04-21-2013 at 07:22 PM.
K_King is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 01:49 PM
  #6279  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
ColbyRichards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 566
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

What does increasing toe in on the rear give and take away? I picked up a used roller and it comes with 0 degree aluminium rears. Is this the common set used or the 0.5 set?

ColbyRichards is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 02:01 PM
  #6280  
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
jkirkwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,241
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ColbyRichards
What does increasing toe in on the rear give and take away? I picked up a used roller and it comes with 0 degree aluminium rears. Is this the common set used or the 0.5 set?

When traction is low, you'll typically migrate to using more toe-in in the rear to lock it in more on power. In stock classes you'll loose perhaps a little straight away speed by increasing toe, but I'm not so sure that's an issue with modified classes with as much power we have these days.

Some racers also say by increasing rear toe-in that it gives more initial steering because of more break-effect (drag) caused by the rear end. I typically don't consider it.
jkirkwood is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 02:49 PM
  #6281  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
ColbyRichards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 566
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jkirkwood
When traction is low, you'll typically migrate to using more toe-in in the rear to lock it in more on power. In stock classes you'll loose perhaps a little straight away speed by increasing toe, but I'm not so sure that's an issue with modified classes with as much power we have these days.

Some racers also say by increasing rear toe-in that it gives more initial steering because of more break-effect (drag) caused by the rear end. I typically don't consider it.
Does this affect how it corners through the end of the corner? I like to have lots of turn in and holding lines through the corners. Like I'm driving on carpet really

ColbyRichards is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 03:13 PM
  #6282  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (47)
 
K_King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,234
Trader Rating: 47 (100%+)
Default

It should rotate less. Meaning more rear grip.
K_King is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 05:22 PM
  #6283  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (94)
 
teeforb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego & Compton CA
Posts: 7,261
Trader Rating: 94 (100%+)
Default

I run on the same track as K_King. I just came back from running my 17.5 in mid motor configuration and WOW! So much more corner speed! I may have to get my rear motor mod to mid motor configuration as well.

I was running clay compound front and rear
teeforb is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 05:32 PM
  #6284  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
asc6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Meridian Idaho
Posts: 3,412
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo911
Thinking out loud here. When I get to a track that I know or to a new track, the first thing I do is test tires. Primarily looking for max rear traction and good side bite. I usually use a front tire that I know will push as to not interfere with the selection of the rear tire. Once set on rear tire, I try different front tires til I am satisfied or run out of time. Most times I end up changing to a front tire with less traction than the max traction tire that I have.

I also will play with roll center on the rear for traction and side bite, generally don't play with anti-squat.

My question is: maybe I should start using the front tire with more traction than I like and start tuning the front of the car to take traction out versus changing to a tire with less traction.

I would be interested to hear some other opinions/thoughts on this.

Turbo
I Ran a new track today and the rear was a handful. It was so different from font to back I chose the easy way out and changed front tires to match the feel of the rear. As I work on rear grip I know I can easily add more front with a simple and quick change.
I suppose I could have changed several things for incremental loss but it was so far off the tire change was needed.
asc6000 is offline  
Old 04-21-2013, 05:36 PM
  #6285  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (68)
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Valley Cottage NY
Posts: 2,035
Trader Rating: 68 (100%+)
Default

I stripped my servo horn today. I decided on the losi aluminum replacement. Should I be adding any shims behind the ball stud?
Speedychris22 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.