snoopyrc

iTrader: (2)

It's funny because I got out of my Yokomo SD, which was comparable to the TC4 in a lot of ways, but it seemed like I would enjoy something that would handle better and have a broader setup envelope. So I bought a Serpent S400. That lasted about a day since you couldn't get parts for it. So I moved back to the old Yokomo and ran it for several more years. I had to wait for parts to come from Japan, but at least I could get them. I've been wanting to pull the trigger on a new chassis but money has been so tight. So I am going to try to run the unsupported snake using Tamiya 417 and TA05 suspension components.

Wish me luck.

DBM

I finally ran my first vta (cta in Canada) race yesterday, using a spec-r s. It was way more fun than I thought it would be. Coming from 17.5 touring, the cta cars are a lot slower, but makes them easier to drive. My cheap old Spec-R was posting the same lap times as the xray/ serpent/tamiya 417 v5, so it is nice to know that $120 chassis is adequate for the class. Is definitely recommend the class to any noobs interested in getting into on road. The bodies look super cool too.

nf_ekt

iTrader: (115)

I'd say the "S" series (spec-r) is the best for VTA, a little extra weight and flex. Both are good for VTA. The class is perfect for a wide range of chassis to compete . I'm building an older Xray as a second car but I am also holding on to a TC3, which has been working fairly well for me.

DARKSIDE

iTrader: (2)

hi

mikel33

iTrader: (2)

Upping your post count again Myron?

k_bojar

iTrader: (30)

welcome back, Myron. you getting ready to post some big news about a certain race?? .

PROMODVETTE

iTrader: (70)

Yeah like if esc's will be opened up to more than just the 3 remaining ones left on the USVTA list.

k_bojar

iTrader: (30)

that's RobK - not darkside

PROMODVETTE

iTrader: (70)

I was implying for Darksides megarace in September.

snoopyrc

iTrader: (2)

I was wondering who sets their chassis up to have the longest wheelbase? Who likes it short and who just sets it up to match the fenders on the shell that they are running? I am needing a new shell, but I want to save my Protoform Firebird for a bigger race. So I unpacked this McAllister Mustang and it looks like there is a lot of lexan behind the rear wheel arch.

nf_ekt

iTrader: (115)

I've never considered McAllister shells to be proportionally-perfect (though they are very durable). I wouldn't get too radical on changing up your chassis in order to make it look "correct". If it handles well at this point just mount it up with the current wheelbase... get use to the feel of that shell first.

snoopyrc

iTrader: (2)

They look pretty good during a race when they are zipping by and there is no chance to inspect them. They do hold up well against the abuse of racing, but proportion and precision are not quite what they are in the top two producers of VTA shells.

nf_ekt

iTrader: (115)

I've tried a few different shells from Parma, Protoform, HPI, McAllister. Gotta' love the HPI '69 Camaro the most. I know they are everywhere you look and I resisted for a long time, but once I tried one I pretty much decided it's what I will mostly stick to. Pretty durable with the shoe-goo treatment, handles decent, looks killer. Maybe the biggest let down was the protoform firebird. Looks awesome but the nose got smashed up quick and I didn't really care for the handling. This is on a huge outdoor track. I think it does look the best out of them all though!

PROMODVETTE

iTrader: (70)

Too bad HPI doesn't make lightweight versions. I think then the 68 would be the ultimate choice!

nf_ekt

iTrader: (115)

I like the durability it has as-is. And I figure as heavy as you have to make these things, the shell is just another way to achieve the mark. Definitely like the 68 . My LHS has had no problem getting them.