New Efra rules
#61
I like the idea of quieter cars, though many may not want the extra weight a more complex pipe could bring, but my head rings after a day running nitro, and your throat often aches from screaming down at your pit man trying to be heard over the roar, so I'd love it to be at least a little quieter.
I'm sorry, but anybody that would want to squelch the symphony of sound, as demonstrated in the vid below, has something wrong with them IMO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBjtY...eature=related
#62
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
I'm sorry, but anybody that would want to squelch the symphony of sound, as demonstrated in the vid below, has something wrong with them IMO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBjtY...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBjtY...eature=related
Pass you soon
#63
#64
One could always were ear plugs in the pits you still can hear it just cuts back on some of the high pitch noise. I use the every day I work at the airport so I know.
#65
I have an onroad track near home closed to the Nitro cars because of the noise ...and a closed offroad track also...
#66
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
I'm sorry, but anybody that would want to squelch the symphony of sound, as demonstrated in the vid below, has something wrong with them IMO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBjtY...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBjtY...eature=related
There is a history of racing in some places (full scale and small scale), where there was a chance to be proactive, but it got ignored, only to then get cut off completely.
#67
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
I like the noise/sound, it's the decibels I'm not keen on (more so when there is a full field of cars out there), they don't have to be ear splitting to sound awesome, so don't make that mistake, cause it's what kills motor sport.
There is a history of racing in some places (full scale and small scale), where there was a chance to be proactive, but it got ignored, only to then get cut off completely.
There is a history of racing in some places (full scale and small scale), where there was a chance to be proactive, but it got ignored, only to then get cut off completely.
Last edited by lil-bump; 11-15-2011 at 04:22 PM.
#68
What are the EFRA people smoking at these meetings
I hope IFMAR and/or AARCMCC doesn't follow suit
1550g is a completely unrealistic weight limit!!!
1650 should be the min weight but as per ususal it seems the people who make the decisions don't think
Farewell nitro On Road racing
I hope IFMAR and/or AARCMCC doesn't follow suit
1550g is a completely unrealistic weight limit!!!
1650 should be the min weight but as per ususal it seems the people who make the decisions don't think
Farewell nitro On Road racing
#69
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
What are the EFRA people smoking at these meetings
I hope IFMAR and/or AARCMCC doesn't follow suit
1550g is a completely unrealistic weight limit!!!
1650 should be the min weight but as per ususal it seems the people who make the decisions don't think
Farewell nitro On Road racing
I hope IFMAR and/or AARCMCC doesn't follow suit
1550g is a completely unrealistic weight limit!!!
1650 should be the min weight but as per ususal it seems the people who make the decisions don't think
Farewell nitro On Road racing
#70
Tech Rookie
not too light
From what I see, my NT1: 1590g (graphite chassis plate and lipo), my friend's HK-1: 1630g (using graphite chassis plate) and as shown in Capricorn's pic: 1550g.
So 1550g is not unrealistic. The chassis material and receiver battery is the key and I don't think that cost very much extra. With better heatsink materials or design, 1550 is not difficult to achieve.
If we want GP to keep up with the pace and agility of the brushless cars, reducing weight should be the right move.
So 1550g is not unrealistic. The chassis material and receiver battery is the key and I don't think that cost very much extra. With better heatsink materials or design, 1550 is not difficult to achieve.
If we want GP to keep up with the pace and agility of the brushless cars, reducing weight should be the right move.
#71
Tech Initiate
Is using a graphite chassis plate a good way of reducing weight? You decrease the weight at the lowest point so the CoG will get higher.
From what I see, my NT1: 1590g (graphite chassis plate and lipo), my friend's HK-1: 1630g (using graphite chassis plate) and as shown in Capricorn's pic: 1550g.
So 1550g is not unrealistic. The chassis material and receiver battery is the key and I don't think that cost very much extra. With better heatsink materials or design, 1550 is not difficult to achieve.
If we want GP to keep up with the pace and agility of the brushless cars, reducing weight should be the right move.
So 1550g is not unrealistic. The chassis material and receiver battery is the key and I don't think that cost very much extra. With better heatsink materials or design, 1550 is not difficult to achieve.
If we want GP to keep up with the pace and agility of the brushless cars, reducing weight should be the right move.
#72
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
Things like carbon to replace alloy is one of the few ways you can drop weight, but like everything just because you can do it, does not mean you should.
Every time I seem to see a weight change, it's either still too heavy or now too light, somewhere along the line they ignore the middle ground almost every time.
I actually read some of the EFRA AGM notes, someone suggested a more sensible weight, then for some reason it was withdrawn and then the overly light limit was proposed and then passed, no real incite into the whys.
Every time I seem to see a weight change, it's either still too heavy or now too light, somewhere along the line they ignore the middle ground almost every time.
I actually read some of the EFRA AGM notes, someone suggested a more sensible weight, then for some reason it was withdrawn and then the overly light limit was proposed and then passed, no real incite into the whys.
#73
Tech Rookie
I use the NT1 multiflex adjustment engine mount to do the adjustment. It is good to me.
Some people worry about the heat dissipation for the engine on hot Summer days but I have no proof if this is something that we should worry. I too want to know the answer.
#74
Tech Regular
Messuring body height
170mm from the gound on a 20mm spacer will give an height of 160mm. If your downstop is set that the wheels can touch the ground you can set the body at the illigal 170mm but legally
170mm from the gound on a 20mm spacer will give an height of 160mm. If your downstop is set that the wheels can touch the ground you can set the body at the illigal 170mm but legally
Can You explain this please. I dont understand...
#75
Downstops and body height goes together. If the car is lift up and you don't care about having too much rear down travel, you can adjust the boy height by turning the downstop screws.
When the car is then put into the track, you actually have higher body than before, and higher than it was on the inspection table...
Max down travel, 20mm
inspection blocks, 20mm
inspection height, 160mm
ride hight, 7mm
==> Body height on the track, 173mm
Suits fine for me =)
-X-
When the car is then put into the track, you actually have higher body than before, and higher than it was on the inspection table...
Max down travel, 20mm
inspection blocks, 20mm
inspection height, 160mm
ride hight, 7mm
==> Body height on the track, 173mm
Suits fine for me =)
-X-