Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Ernest Provetti Open letter to RC Industry >

Ernest Provetti Open letter to RC Industry

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Ernest Provetti Open letter to RC Industry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2010, 04:14 PM
  #121  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (48)
 
gashuffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: RcVille
Posts: 5,230
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ckaspar
I have an idea.

Open motor, open to all drivers, Qualifying is not separated out by class or motor , just times. The faster X percent are in the Pro Class, the next X percent are in Expert, the next X percent are in Sportsman the remainder go in novice.

It seems to me that would stop the sandbagging/moaning/whining/etc.

In short, I could be in a Qual race with Barry Baker, I know he is going to whomp me! He quals for Pro and me for "Get the heck off the track you don't even belong here".

Or for smaller club races base it off of practice times throughout the day or something.

The "Class" seems subjective to me. Am I a Novice or am I Sportsman? Who knows? The only real determination is the amount of times I can get around the track in 5 minutes, how clean I run, etc. That is the real determination in my mind.
That's how the gas guys do it but with that you know where you stand. Unfortunately there are to many electric classes.
gashuffer is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:23 PM
  #122  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
charlie_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 9,927
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gashuffer
That's how the gas guys do it but with that you know where you stand.
But it still doesn't stop peeps from sandbagging. One can easily "break" on qualifiers and miraculously win the mains.
charlie_b is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:43 PM
  #123  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joel Lagace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,650
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by stiltskin
NO I didn't. (said it last, got my fingers crossed) If I save $10 on a motor, the discount didn't make me faster. I was going to buy the motor anyway. If I bought 9 motors and you could only afford 8 with the same money, did I really get an advantage over you on the track? The same motor, car, speedo, etc... is available to everyone else in the market. My point is that if I drop my sponsors, I'm still the same driver, with the same talent. Now I just pay more for my stuff.

Answer to this problem is: create a new NOVICE / AMATEUR class but still allow sponsored drivers to race 17.5. Choose whatever motor you want for novice, but why force other drivers into a faster class when they are happy with the one they're in?

well said as well as your prev post.... AFter all we only race one set of tires, one motor and one ESC at a time... Having 10 of each in the pits dont help you once u hit the track. Great drivers win races...
Joel Lagace is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:47 PM
  #124  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (103)
 
stiltskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 5,393
Trader Rating: 103 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Joel Lagace
well said as well as your prev post.... AFter all we only race one set of tires, one motor and one ESC at a time... Having 10 of each in the pits dont help you once u hit the track. Great drivers win races...
stiltskin is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:58 PM
  #125  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brandon, MS
Posts: 543
Default

Surprised no one has mentioned it yet. The one thing it may do is make a few manufacturers rethink some of the 50% sponsorships that they use to move products out the door at a higher price that wholesale. I could see where a bunch of local hobby shops might stand to gain, keep tracks open, giving new racers a place to start.

Talk about thread drift

Ed M.
bentgear is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:10 PM
  #126  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
M-Technic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 2,562
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gashuffer
So what wins sells ans at the end of the day money is the goal. People do get faster when they have the best gear because that plays a big role in performance along with practice. So to answer your question that you didn't get faster with discounts is yes you did. .
Using that logic, we should create classes based on your gross income. Because it wouldn't be fair for a grown adult making $100,000 a year to race against a teenage making $1,000 a year. One will clearly have a larger racing budget, regardless of driving talent.


Originally Posted by stiltskin
NO I didn't. (said it last, got my fingers crossed) If I save $10 on a motor, the discount didn't make me faster. I was going to buy the motor anyway. If I bought 9 motors and you could only afford 8 with the same money, did I really get an advantage over you on the track? The same motor, car, speedo, etc... is available to everyone else in the market. My point is that if I drop my sponsors, I'm still the same driver, with the same talent. Now I just pay more for my stuff. ?
Well put. And it should be noted that a very large percentage of sponsored drivers are just 50% deals. And that is 50% off MSRP, not street pricing. Which in the end works out to only a marginal discount. A full factory driver who gets paid to race probably doesn't belong in stock class. Most of the examples in this thread are for 50% drivers that at most, drive at the state level. Some might only club race. There are a lot of large companies that offer sponsorships to help sell product and grow their company's visibility to the general club racers/bashers. The sponsorship doesn't mean you are a national caliber driver.
M-Technic is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:11 PM
  #127  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Aparatchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 190
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

paraphrasing one of the few bumperstickers I actually like:

Shut up and drive!!

I mean, really... pick a class, build your car, practice, race, lose, learn, its all fun. There are plenty of 'slow' options for novices in VTA, F1 silvercan, TCS, Mini, etc...
Aparatchik is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:11 PM
  #128  
Suspended
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Using spec tires would be the easiest and very cost effective way to regulate how fast the cars in the lower level classes can go and let people run any motor and esc they wanted. It wouldnt matter how fast your car was if you didnt have the traction to use it. Also racing with tires that didnt have the best traction would help the drivers to develop car and throttle control.

Just a thought....
RC Racer OG is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:16 PM
  #129  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
M-Technic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 2,562
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by RC Racer OG
Using spec tires would be the easiest and very cost effective way to regulate how fast the cars in the lower level classes can go and let people run any motor and esc they wanted. It wouldnt matter how fast your car was if you didnt have the traction to use it. Also racing with tires that didnt have the best traction would help the drivers to develop car and throttle control.

Just a thought....
That is exactly the premise of VTA/RCGT.
M-Technic is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:23 PM
  #130  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

Not really...I don't know about RCGT but VTA also keeps the motor within limits of the traction of the tires for the most part. Limiting traction alone only creates unsafe cars as people largely will overdrive the tires. The best way to limit speeds is through limiting power...after that you can think about limiting traction.

Besides...I for one don't find it enjoyable to drive a loose car...some people do, some people don't.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 05:28 PM
  #131  
Suspended
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 736
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by InspGadgt
Not really...I don't know about RCGT but VTA also keeps the motor within limits of the traction of the tires for the most part. Limiting traction alone only creates unsafe cars as people largely will overdrive the tires. The best way to limit speeds is through limiting power...after that you can think about limiting traction.

Besides...I for one don't find it enjoyable to drive a loose car...some people do, some people don't.
You want to talk about creating unsafe cars? When was the last time you watched people run 1/8 scale cars on a club race night?

Last edited by RC Racer OG; 01-15-2010 at 06:09 PM.
RC Racer OG is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 06:05 PM
  #132  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

It has been awhile since we haven't ran 1/8th out here in over 10 years for on-road...but yeah that's a good example of too much power and not enough traction and how dangerous that can be.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 06:38 PM
  #133  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (48)
 
gashuffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: RcVille
Posts: 5,230
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by M-Technic
Using that logic, we should create classes based on your gross income. Because it wouldn't be fair for a grown adult making $100,000 a year to race against a teenage making $1,000 a year. One will clearly have a larger racing budget, regardless of driving talent.
Thats not even close to the point I was making.

Last edited by gashuffer; 01-15-2010 at 07:02 PM.
gashuffer is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 06:44 PM
  #134  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (48)
 
gashuffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: RcVille
Posts: 5,230
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by charlie_b
But it still doesn't stop peeps from sandbagging. One can easily "break" on qualifiers and miraculously win the mains.
This is true.
gashuffer is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 06:46 PM
  #135  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (48)
 
gashuffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: RcVille
Posts: 5,230
Trader Rating: 48 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by stiltskin
NO I didn't. (said it last, got my fingers crossed) If I save $10 on a motor, the discount didn't make me faster. I was going to buy the motor anyway. If I bought 9 motors and you could only afford 8 with the same money, did I really get an advantage over you on the track? The same motor, car, speedo, etc... is available to everyone else in the market. My point is that if I drop my sponsors, I'm still the same driver, with the same talent. Now I just pay more for my stuff.

Answer to this problem is: create a new NOVICE / AMATEUR class but still allow sponsored drivers to race 17.5. Choose whatever motor you want for novice, but why force other drivers into a faster class when they are happy with the one they're in?
You will always have skill. It's that set of tires you'll wish you had that you got for free before you dropped your sponsor

I'm done stirring the pot.
gashuffer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.