Xray T1
#3571
Tech Regular
Hey guys!
Andrew Swanson did a great job on running the T1 Raycer at the 4th Anuaul "SpeedWorld Cup" race in Roseville California. He took 3rd in the Expert Mod class, (1st place was Greg Hodapp, 2nd was Matt Francis), the car was pretty much stock out of the box, except of the following: Alu Shock body, and the bulk heads off the Evo 2.
Andrew thanks for the help over the weekend.
Andrew Swanson did a great job on running the T1 Raycer at the 4th Anuaul "SpeedWorld Cup" race in Roseville California. He took 3rd in the Expert Mod class, (1st place was Greg Hodapp, 2nd was Matt Francis), the car was pretty much stock out of the box, except of the following: Alu Shock body, and the bulk heads off the Evo 2.
Andrew thanks for the help over the weekend.
#3576
Originally posted by IMPACTPLAYR
The EVO2 bulks are the same only not hard annodized aluminum...... The Duraluminum is quite strong enough that it doesn't need to be hard annodized.....
The EVO2 bulks are the same only not hard annodized aluminum...... The Duraluminum is quite strong enough that it doesn't need to be hard annodized.....
#3578
Some people have had that problem with the batts popping out, but only those that filed the edges of the batt slots. I noticed the problem after a couple of Xray drivers short circuited their batts. I decided not to file the edges and hadn't had a problem with the batts popping out.
#3579
Tech Champion
iTrader: (5)
1.77 pullies
I got my 1.77 pulleys installed and yes-by god-the drivetrain is much freer!!! my 3mm belt was on back-order-so I am not getting the full effect!! But it is freer-no doubt.
I moved the eccentrics around quite a bit-based on where Neil and Ralph said to set-them, but I did go one looser front and rear as they felt too tight for stock racing, but-I could be wrong.
But-the front and rear belts are still as tight or tighter than how I had them before.
Just FYI-The belt tensioner has an amplified affect on the belt now. At its loosest position at applies more pressure on belt than the stock pulley set-up. I took mine off for now.
Ray
I moved the eccentrics around quite a bit-based on where Neil and Ralph said to set-them, but I did go one looser front and rear as they felt too tight for stock racing, but-I could be wrong.
But-the front and rear belts are still as tight or tighter than how I had them before.
Just FYI-The belt tensioner has an amplified affect on the belt now. At its loosest position at applies more pressure on belt than the stock pulley set-up. I took mine off for now.
Ray
#3581
Tech Apprentice
Hey Ray. Do you remember how much that new pullies set and new rear belt cost? Or is it secret I`m just courius to know, because i do not see prices nowhere
#3585
Re: 1.77 pullies
Originally posted by rayhuang
I got my 1.77 pulleys installed and yes-by god-the drivetrain is much freer!!! my 3mm belt was on back-order-so I am not getting the full effect!! But it is freer-no doubt.
I moved the eccentrics around quite a bit-based on where Neil and Ralph said to set-them, but I did go one looser front and rear as they felt too tight for stock racing, but-I could be wrong.
But-the front and rear belts are still as tight or tighter than how I had them before.
Just FYI-The belt tensioner has an amplified affect on the belt now. At its loosest position at applies more pressure on belt than the stock pulley set-up. I took mine off for now.
Ray
I got my 1.77 pulleys installed and yes-by god-the drivetrain is much freer!!! my 3mm belt was on back-order-so I am not getting the full effect!! But it is freer-no doubt.
I moved the eccentrics around quite a bit-based on where Neil and Ralph said to set-them, but I did go one looser front and rear as they felt too tight for stock racing, but-I could be wrong.
But-the front and rear belts are still as tight or tighter than how I had them before.
Just FYI-The belt tensioner has an amplified affect on the belt now. At its loosest position at applies more pressure on belt than the stock pulley set-up. I took mine off for now.
Ray
Jimmy