Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Corally RDX Phi 09 >

Corally RDX Phi 09

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Corally RDX Phi 09

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2010, 02:57 PM
  #526  
Regional Moderator
 
mr4-malta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Malta!
Posts: 422
Default

just saw this on the corally site - NEW! RDX PHI '09 CHASSIS 'SUPER NARROW'
http://www.corally.com/anubizz/coral...FSName=Corally

Anyone has anymore info about this or pics of it on the car?
mr4-malta is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 04:07 AM
  #527  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by miku
The car is supposed to have the straight arms to give them ago but I have been having trouble getting them in Australia (2 Months so far) and have ordered from the UK as well and they should arrive late next week hopefully.

I notice when you run the straight arms you have to replace the front sway bar wire does this help the issue?

Michael
I have just been fitting the straight arms here in NZ, and found a few things to consider...
You really want to move the rear diff to the forward position so the driveshafts are straight. And the shocks line up really nicely on the front face of the arm, so there's are no need for ridiculous spacers. And also the Assassin short ball stud straighten out the upper arms. But when you have the shocks on the front of the arm, the sway bar needs to run across the front of the diff (like with the swept arms) instead of the back-on the small carbon piece. But... the sway bar clashes with the diff, so I have now fitted a 36tooth diff pulley and all is well. Of course to flip the rear diff you need a shorter belt (183tooth) (I used an Xray 183tooth, yes sinful I know - I'll replace it with a dependable Corally next order). I've left the front diff/spool with the 42/21 pulleys, and the rear with the 36/18 pulleys, so even though they are all different, the ratio is the same, and I didn't need to change the front belt. I did it this way because I have some spares of the 41 and 21 pulleys - might as well keep using them.

I also tried fitting an xray 189tooth rear belt with the standard pulleys but it was slightly too short.

Also, if you do somehow run the rear diff forward with the large pulley forward, and run a sway bar forward of the diff, to get around the swaybar hitting the pulley you can also double up the swaybar mounts and then it clears - but only by a mm. I found the 36pulley was a better solution.

Cheers
Mick - arg noooo I mean Mike
Vexxer is offline  
Old 05-05-2010, 10:43 PM
  #528  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Kewl post Vexxer. Very creative!

Suggest that you name the car "Frankenstein"...LOL

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 12:47 PM
  #529  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Highfields
Posts: 189
Default

Originally Posted by Vexxer
I have just been fitting the straight arms here in NZ, and found a few things to consider...
You really want to move the rear diff to the forward position so the driveshafts are straight. And the shocks line up really nicely on the front face of the arm, so there's are no need for ridiculous spacers. And also the Assassin short ball stud straighten out the upper arms. But when you have the shocks on the front of the arm, the sway bar needs to run across the front of the diff (like with the swept arms) instead of the back-on the small carbon piece. But... the sway bar clashes with the diff, so I have now fitted a 36tooth diff pulley and all is well. Of course to flip the rear diff you need a shorter belt (183tooth) (I used an Xray 183tooth, yes sinful I know - I'll replace it with a dependable Corally next order). I've left the front diff/spool with the 42/21 pulleys, and the rear with the 36/18 pulleys, so even though they are all different, the ratio is the same, and I didn't need to change the front belt. I did it this way because I have some spares of the 41 and 21 pulleys - might as well keep using them.

I also tried fitting an xray 189tooth rear belt with the standard pulleys but it was slightly too short.

Also, if you do somehow run the rear diff forward with the large pulley forward, and run a sway bar forward of the diff, to get around the swaybar hitting the pulley you can also double up the swaybar mounts and then it clears - but only by a mm. I found the 36pulley was a better solution.

Cheers
Mick - arg noooo I mean Mike
Mike

Thanks for the info will save me a lot of time going through the same thing.

That explains why some of the latest setup sheets I have seen have been running the 36 pulleys.

Regards

Michael
miku is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 01:02 PM
  #530  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
s.nicholson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 672
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mr4-malta
just saw this on the corally site - NEW! RDX PHI '09 CHASSIS 'SUPER NARROW'
http://www.corally.com/anubizz/coral...FSName=Corally

Anyone has anymore info about this or pics of it on the car?
Hi, already have the new chassis fitted. Looks very nice and also makes balancing the car with lipo very easy. I'll let u know how it goes compared to STD chassis on the weekend.
s.nicholson is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 01:02 PM
  #531  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Malta
Posts: 59
Default

I have a corally RDX Phi 09 for sale for 180 euros and 20 euros shipped to worldwide. If someone is interested please contact me on my email [email protected]
Sonter is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 11:34 PM
  #532  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by s.nicholson
Hi, already have the new chassis fitted. Looks very nice and also makes balancing the car with lipo very easy. I'll let u know how it goes compared to STD chassis on the weekend.
Awesome Simon!!, do let us feeble mortals know.

Obviously gone are the battery posts, any bolt in weights, and it looks like because of the thinner chassis, there are no machined slots for the wishbone mounts. - **And it only fits the straight arms.**

I'd be quite keen because I think the 2.4mm chassis is too still stiff for low grip situations.

Michael vdH
Vexxer is offline  
Old 05-07-2010, 12:21 PM
  #533  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Default

Have been testing the new lipo chassi for about a month, a bit more. The prototype one.

Have tested on both High-grip carpet and low grip asphalt. Compared to the old wide std chassi the biggest difference is that in narrow corners and 180s the car is easier to take around the corner. Its rotate WAY much better. And the left-right balance on the track is pretty awesome. The biggest improvement is steering, alot more steering was added to the car with new chassis, mostly due to the cutouts in front. I will say for rubber tires this is the way to go guys!

Few pics for your interest. If you have questions, feel free to ask!

/Daniel Carlsson
Attached Thumbnails Corally RDX Phi 09-dsc00718.jpg1.jpg   Corally RDX Phi 09-dsc00764.jpg-1.jpg   Corally RDX Phi 09-dsc00765.jpg-1.jpg   Corally RDX Phi 09-dsc00766.jpg-1.jpg   Corally RDX Phi 09-dsc00767.jpg-1.jpg  

_RDX_ is offline  
Old 05-07-2010, 01:01 PM
  #534  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
s.nicholson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 672
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Also I noticed while putting the new chassis on, the rear wheelbase is 1-2 mm longer.
s.nicholson is offline  
Old 05-07-2010, 07:36 PM
  #535  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by _RDX_
Have been testing the new lipo chassi for about a month, a bit more. The prototype one.

Have tested on both High-grip carpet and low grip asphalt. Compared to the old wide std chassi the biggest difference is that in narrow corners and 180s the car is easier to take around the corner. Its rotate WAY much better. And the left-right balance on the track is pretty awesome. The biggest improvement is steering, alot more steering was added to the car with new chassis, mostly due to the cutouts in front. I will say for rubber tires this is the way to go guys!

Few pics for your interest. If you have questions, feel free to ask!

/Daniel Carlsson
So, virtually every component on the chassis hangs out from each side? Seems pretty minimalist.

Would suggest that you shoe gu the steering servo down to it. Has saved me a lot of repair work with the regular chassis. Tosolini suggested it a couple years back.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 05-07-2010, 07:41 PM
  #536  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by s.nicholson
Also I noticed while putting the new chassis on, the rear wheelbase is 1-2 mm longer.
Patiently waiting for that report. Remember, you are a day ahead of us Simon...LOL

Bill
Still Bill is offline  
Old 05-07-2010, 11:43 PM
  #537  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6
Thumbs up

Cheers for those pics RDX - Excellent!!
Vexxer is offline  
Old 05-08-2010, 04:27 AM
  #538  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 25
Default

I have not glued the servo down to the chassi if you mean that bill.. I always use the std corally servo posts. As it has always worked for me, no problem with broken chassi or servo. And yes the wheelbase is 1-2mm longer for easier fine tuning in length of wheelbase.
_RDX_ is offline  
Old 05-08-2010, 05:42 AM
  #539  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dordon , England
Posts: 387
Default

New chassis looks very interesting, will have to take a closer look when the UK importer gets a few in.
weekendracer_uk is offline  
Old 05-09-2010, 06:49 AM
  #540  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,379
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by _RDX_
I have not glued the servo down to the chassi if you mean that bill.. I always use the std corally servo posts. As it has always worked for me, no problem with broken chassi or servo. And yes the wheelbase is 1-2mm longer for easier fine tuning in length of wheelbase.
That is exactly what I mean. And shoe goo is easily removable.

Not so much about breaking parts. But, I have had the posts shift and servo move after moderate shunts.

Bill
Still Bill is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.