Serpent 710
Originally posted by Pit-racer
It is the RB Concepts pipe which is about the same as nova tp06
It is the RB Concepts pipe which is about the same as nova tp06
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by jfc_tech
what engine is that? looks like the Palmaris engine heatsink
nice 710!
what engine is that? looks like the Palmaris engine heatsink
nice 710!
What does the newest batch of 710 have i compared to the older ones? The last time I remember when I bought my 2nd 710 was that the fuel tank had a internal filter and thicker shock towers. Im not sure but are there any other newer parts that are currently out that I might not know about?
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
Bag numbers
In the process of building the 710 I have a lot of bags that have A at the end of the bag number such as "Bag - 15A". I'm assuming perhaps incorrectly that there has been an update to the original kit and not the instruction manual.
Can someone who knows more about this than me please confirm.
Can someone who knows more about this than me please confirm.
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
Are the newer rear lower arms avail.?
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by InitialD
Yup. The shape looks the same. What RB part number is that? It looks like the stinger is shortened.
Yup. The shape looks the same. What RB part number is that? It looks like the stinger is shortened.
Tech Fanatic
Originally posted by Pit-racer
We are testing between the 2- sts and nova carbs.
We are testing between the 2- sts and nova carbs.
Why not testing OS carb ? to me it was more proportional throttle movement vs fuels coming out...
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
The sts carbs tend to sit a lil higher on the engine, so we get a better clerance for the throttle linkage.
Re: Bag numbers
Originally posted by B4
I'm assuming perhaps incorrectly that there has been an update to the original kit and not the instruction manual.
I'm assuming perhaps incorrectly that there has been an update to the original kit and not the instruction manual.
Tech Fanatic
Originally posted by Pit-racer
The sts carbs tend to sit a lil higher on the engine, so we get a better clerance for the throttle linkage.
The sts carbs tend to sit a lil higher on the engine, so we get a better clerance for the throttle linkage.
I checked that you were EP racer too.
1 question, did Palmaris can be drove just like electric motor?
I meant, you can squeze the trigger slowly to top slowly and the engine sings proportionally.
With nova carbs, I found (Im just a noobie ) with flush setting of spray bar almost impossible to do that (Nova base engine).
Usually i retard it near to 1mm to make my engine sings like that.
Oh ya, i got new batch of RR lower arm coming in, I will let you know if it new batch already.
Originally posted by GoldFinger
I never had an STS carbs, do you have a link ?
Why not testing OS carb ? to me it was more proportional throttle movement vs fuels coming out...
I never had an STS carbs, do you have a link ?
Why not testing OS carb ? to me it was more proportional throttle movement vs fuels coming out...
STS carbs are close to ideal because STS engines work about the same as Nova engines. But one thing I found about STS carbs are that they are composite and not aluminum like Nova.
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by InitialD
That's the lowest roll center setting for the front. Front upper arms are raised with 2+2 mm shim below the arms.
I actually just wanted to try it out and it felt OK. I'm wanting to try out the highest roll center setting (as what I have in my diff setup) with the solid front. I think it will make the car more responsive in the front. I found the car (with front diff) to be very nice in the chincanes with a high front roll center.
Yup. Play around with it. Sometimes I use 1 mm or sometimes I use 2 mm. If I use a lot of caster, I get a lot of on power steering. Too much coming out of the corner that the rear end goes wild. Well, the less caster also helps in the turn in of the sharp corners.
That's the lowest roll center setting for the front. Front upper arms are raised with 2+2 mm shim below the arms.
I actually just wanted to try it out and it felt OK. I'm wanting to try out the highest roll center setting (as what I have in my diff setup) with the solid front. I think it will make the car more responsive in the front. I found the car (with front diff) to be very nice in the chincanes with a high front roll center.
Yup. Play around with it. Sometimes I use 1 mm or sometimes I use 2 mm. If I use a lot of caster, I get a lot of on power steering. Too much coming out of the corner that the rear end goes wild. Well, the less caster also helps in the turn in of the sharp corners.
I cannot get the rear down to 197mm since changing rear roll center. The top pivotball is compressed all the way with no space inbetween, is this going to be a problem?
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by Pit-racer
Yes it is the PS12 engine.
Yes it is the PS12 engine.
i think that all the snakes will get tamed by the new v one rrr
Originally posted by kreidel
I cannot get the rear down to 197mm since changing rear roll center. The top pivotball is compressed all the way with no space inbetween, is this going to be a problem?
I cannot get the rear down to 197mm since changing rear roll center. The top pivotball is compressed all the way with no space inbetween, is this going to be a problem?
Which roll center are you using? UBO/LB? I believe you would need to tighten the top rear pivot ball to the max and then set the rear camber / toe in. The minimum trackwidth I measured was 197 mm I believe. If you have different left and right rear camber, your top rear pivot ball would be screwed in differently.
If you still cannot get to the rear trackwidth, then just get the most minimum that you can get. Watch the rear dogbones. Make sure that it does not bind.