Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
A123 Cells Roar?? >

A123 Cells Roar??

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

A123 Cells Roar??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2008, 04:21 PM
  #1  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,668
Trader Rating: 29 (97%+)
Default A123 Cells Roar??

Are these cells roar legal? Their chemistry is safer then lipos & they are already tough and durable.
party_wagon is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 04:36 PM
  #2  
Tech Elite
 
edseb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Laguna Niguel, California
Posts: 2,421
Default

No cells are legal till they are submitted and pass approval as far as I know.
edseb is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 05:59 PM
  #3  
Tech Fanatic
 
trailranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 946
Default

Unless ROAR rules changes to allow that size of cell, all 26650 cells including the A123's will not be legal.

Resons to Approve the cells:
Safe!!!
Industry accepted size: 26 x 65mm
Industy standards are standards!!! Meaning there will be little chance of this battery disappering or changing sizes. Good news for the racers and car makers.
Great replacement for 5-Cell NiMH
Acceptable compromise for 4-Cell vs. LiPO


Reasons not Approve:
????
???

Obstacles if Approved:
New chassis would have to be designed. But then again new chassis and concepts are always in developement.
Current Price of cells are $12 to $20. Most 1:10 scales would require 4-cells meaning $80 packs. Over time the projected price is to fall to $7 a cell once the market has more diversity of manufacutres. I just bought 10 A123 M1 cells for $8.50 a cell shipped, so the the potential of cheaper prices are there.

1:12 scale pan car...major obstacle!!!

Leave the class as-is 4-cell NiMH or convert to a Lithium battery? If 1:12 converts to a lithium battery I would hope it is a LiFePO4 cell like A123. The voltage increase will not be as great as going to a Li-Po. Then you have the question how many cells and what size? Does 1:12 use 2 or 4 A123 cells. What about soft-cell and the smaller 18650 cells. These are all options for 1:12. More experiementation needs to be done with the 1:12 cars and the A123 batteries.
trailranger is offline  
Old 01-23-2008, 09:46 PM
  #4  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
linger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Retired
Posts: 1,132
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

There is no point making the A123 26650 M1 cell legal. Hardly anybody is using them for 1/10 scale racing applications. Lipo's are nearly interchangeable over NIMh in both size and voltage output. The A123 26650 and A123 18650 are not even close to fitting. Every chassis on the market would have to be redesigned and even if they were redesigned, the traditional power sources (NIMH and LIPO) would not fit right.

The A123 cell in my hand right now measures 26.7mm in diameter and 67mm long (not 26 x 65 as the specs would make you believe). A 2S2P 4 cell pack would be too big to fit properly into any 1/10 scale application.

In addition to size, the votage doesn't match up well even with a 4 cell NIMH. At 20 amps, the A123 will average about 2.8V/cell or 5.6V as a two cell series and slighly more if they are paralleled up (2S2P). A good 5 cell NIMH will average more than 6.4V at 20 amps.

If A123 is legal, they would need their own seperate class and separate chassis. The last thing we need is more racing classes.

I think the perfect application for the A123 cell would be the 1/8 scale electric truggy and buggy chassis - assuming that class takes off as projected. It's a nice big robust cell that is well suited for the bumpy and physically abusive class.
linger is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 02:27 AM
  #5  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 308
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

True. I've heard great things about these cells. They seem perfect for RC.
The aeroplanes guys are getting +200 cycles with zip charging them in 5 minutes with +20A charge. 400 cycles with minimum care seems easy. They also seem to tolerate overcharging and overdischarging better than even the current nimhs.
The voltage thing doesnt seem a problem to me. Everybody in europe is happy wih the current 5 cell rule. Less stress on everything (motor, drivetrain, tires,...) and easier to drive.
Problem is, at 27mm diameter they are really hard to fit in current chassis designs. Most cars are under 24mm

Last edited by Itchy; 01-24-2008 at 02:44 AM.
Itchy is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 03:24 AM
  #6  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,037
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Here we go again. ROAR just passed lipos and a different battery comes along.Some people are never happy.
BullFrog is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 05:33 AM
  #7  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 462
Default

The A123 cells aren't anything new.

If A123 wants to get into the racing market, they need to release a sub-c sized cell. This would solve a lot of problems with fitment into the cars.

If this "new" technology is so great, then show us a design that actually fits the standard cell size that's used in the RC, automotive and powertool industry. Sub-c cells are still used in powertools, the Toyota Pius (changed from Panasonic to Sanyo last I heard), and RC.

The current A123 cells simply will not fit into a 12th car and unless you have a car that needs a stepladder to get up to the top deck, they won't fit in sedan. The Tc5 might fit these cells but most will not.
Unregistered is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 07:54 AM
  #8  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (29)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,668
Trader Rating: 29 (97%+)
Default

I have seen tons of people run these cells in cars like the b44. 2 side by side cells is practicly the same size as 3side by side nimh cells. If people believe that using these cells will put you at a disadvantage then I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed since they are much safer & more stable then lipos. I have also seen people easily make a 6minute heat w/ a good 6turn mod using a 1p 2300 mah pack.
party_wagon is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 08:44 AM
  #9  
Tech Elite
 
Rick Hohwart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,004
Default

Originally Posted by BullFrog
Here we go again. ROAR just passed lipos and a different battery comes along.Some people are never happy.
Sad isn't it?
Rick Hohwart is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 08:51 AM
  #10  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Originally Posted by BullFrog
Here we go again. ROAR just passed lipos and a different battery comes along.Some people are never happy.

Roar better begin to adopt & change faster, as the new tech is`nt going to wait...
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 09:03 AM
  #11  
Tech Elite
 
Rick Hohwart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,004
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry
Roar better begin to adopt & change faster, as the new tech is`nt going to wait...
ROAR's next rule should be no rules. You run whatever you can fit in your car as long as the car meets the minumum weight. That will allow any technology.

Of course people will complain about that too.

So you joining ROAR now or are you going to wait until A123 cells are legal?
Rick Hohwart is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 09:06 AM
  #12  
Tech Master
iTrader: (65)
 
billjacobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 1,415
Trader Rating: 65 (100%+)
Default a123

The simple point is that there are 2 people on rctech pushing a123 cells. That's it. They both posted in this thread. If you want to run a123 go ahead, but the problem is that a123 are the least compatible with anything else out there. At least lipo and nimh voltages are close together. There is no reason at all to have a123 unless you run them in an open class where anything goes, and if that's the case, have fun using them.
billjacobs is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 09:22 AM
  #13  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
glassdoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,250
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

As mentioned, A123 needs to make a subc size cell if they are serious about the r/c market. Then we could talk about it seriously.

I have a few A123 cells too, but never got them with 1/10 in mind... they are a good alternative for stuff like bashing and 1/8 conversions etc.
glassdoctor is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 09:23 AM
  #14  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Originally Posted by Rick Hohwart


So you joining ROAR now or are you going to wait until A123 cells are legal?
To late !
already sent Roar a check....


Like mention above the A123 cells look to be very popular for the conversion racer`s ...
and

Those racer`s are the future....
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 01-24-2008, 09:57 AM
  #15  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
linger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Retired
Posts: 1,132
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rick Hohwart
ROAR's next rule should be no rules. You run whatever you can fit in your car as long as the car meets the minumum weight. That will allow any technology.
Rick - Product request #2 from me. Have AE build an electric 1/8th scale buggy/truggy designed around a 4s2P A123 cell - 4.6Ah at a little over 12V. It's time for AE to lead the industry with new innovative products..
linger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.