Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing >

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2011, 11:19 AM
  #12481  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (17)
 
liljohn1064's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deerfield, WI
Posts: 5,919
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by k_bojar
i wasn't singling you out i actually didn't see any of yours and your stand made sense...look at the KO Helios and JR radio - looks identical through, but supposedly the case was just made by KO for JR, but all the guts inside were completely different...but yet, the sceens and functionality was just about identical...no idea

i was just referring to the 'why not ROAR sportsman speedos, like my RS on the official list' kind of guys

those guys are always good for a laugh or two
I was picking on me, but felt it was totally justified in doing so.

Its funny how those of us who own a couple of those RSs know its not good for the class. We know it is a completely different playing field.

Dumb idea for today:

We can create knock offs of the Cirtix with RS guts in them. Sell them for less than what we paid, and all of our customers can win tiny bowling trophies at local events! .... or get their name mentioned over the PA system. Instead of Go fight win! We can chant: Pay Cheat Fail!
liljohn1064 is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 08:03 PM
  #12482  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Im still hoping for Jim Campbell to make a VTA specific ESC that is super smooth, very adjustable within the allowed parameters and so small you will have trouble soldering everything onto it.

And the case has to look sexy. Dont forget the sexy case..
snoopyrc is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 08:28 PM
  #12483  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by snoopyrc
Im still hoping for Jim Campbell to make a VTA specific ESC that is super smooth, very adjustable within the allowed parameters and so small you will have trouble soldering everything onto it.

And the case has to look sexy. Dont forget the sexy case..
well at least we got a new body...oh boy!!!
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 08:43 PM
  #12484  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

You got it.

OK here is the C main.

+ YouTube Video
ERROR: If you can see this, then YouTube is down or you don't have Flash installed.
snoopyrc is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 09:46 PM
  #12485  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
SWTour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hot Mountains of S.E. Arizona
Posts: 3,014
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default NEW Mustang Body from McAllister

Gary McAllister has built a NEW 69 Mustang body for VTA racing...

His original Mustang that he's had for 15 years+ was designed for an old WIDE Pan Car and didn't fit the bill for VTA - so he's built one that will.

Hopefully it will be approved for VTA use w/ no issues.

SWTour is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 10:52 PM
  #12486  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
DARKSIDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville-Memphis
Posts: 9,619
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

he already did....NEW BODY!!!!
DARKSIDE is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:29 AM
  #12487  
Tech Master
iTrader: (39)
 
beemerfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,709
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default McAllister Camaro

Maybe it's come up before and I missed it, but since we're talking McAllister, what keeps the IROC Camaro body part #275 out of the club? Is the front end sloped too far making it more like an oval body and lacking scale? Or is it too late of a year model? Just wondering because if scale is the issue, none of the Parma bodies really look very scale either. They are just nice because they are so tough.
Attached Thumbnails U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing-camaro.png  
beemerfan is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:30 AM
  #12488  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I like it. I think the selling point will be that it is a one piece shell. I think I like the HPI better but this one will be easier to get from the bag to the track and Pooooosibly might hold up better to the scars of war.
snoopyrc is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:51 AM
  #12489  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (30)
 
k_bojar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 7,021
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SWTour
Gary McAllister has built a NEW 69 Mustang body for VTA racing...

His original Mustang that he's had for 15 years+ was designed for an old WIDE Pan Car and didn't fit the bill for VTA - so he's built one that will.

Hopefully it will be approved for VTA use w/ no issues.

glad to see another body manufacturer jumping into (or revising his entry for) the USVTA arena
k_bojar is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 07:11 AM
  #12490  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (75)
 
oeoeo327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,657
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by beemerfan
Maybe it's come up before and I missed it, but since we're talking McAllister, what keeps the IROC Camaro body part #275 out of the club? Is the front end sloped too far making it more like an oval body and lacking scale? Or is it too late of a year model? Just wondering because if scale is the issue, none of the Parma bodies really look very scale either. They are just nice because they are so tough.
That's a later model 2nd gen Camaro shell (1974-1981). The "Golden Era" of the Trans-Am series was history by the time the '74 Camaro was sold to the public.
oeoeo327 is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 09:03 AM
  #12491  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
IndyRC_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,358
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Kudos to McAllister for creating a VTA body. If it comes with window masks and headlight decals, I think I found a replacement for my Pegasus Mustang!!

I would like to see if McAllister could make a '70 Camaro that looks better than the current Pegasus offering.

Last edited by IndyRC_Racer; 09-29-2011 at 09:24 AM.
IndyRC_Racer is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 09:51 AM
  #12492  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
DesertRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sniffin the 'Sauce Fumes
Posts: 4,099
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Instead of a chassis list, approved spedo list, or anything so formal I think that VTA should do something like the guys who run those Grassroots Motorsports 24 Hours of Lemons thing does where each car is inspected by judges who determine if it is in keeping with the spirit of VTA racing and assign Bullshit Factor Laps based on how much stench of cheaterdom or spendyness they detect. For instance, if they see an Xray T3 or any newer $600 chassis thats worth a few docked laps. Ceramic bearings a docked lap, funny expensive gear diffs are a docked lap each, and don't even TRY to be subjective, just throw the book at people until they get it: This is about fair, slow racing of often obsolete hardware on a shoestring budget. I think it would even out pretty quick.
DesertRat is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 11:52 AM
  #12493  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (88)
 
BMenard17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Port, FL
Posts: 6,704
Trader Rating: 88 (99%+)
Default

Stay within the rules and who cares what chassis anyone uses or how much money they throw into their rig....Lets race and let the setup and driver do the talking.
BMenard17 is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 12:01 PM
  #12494  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I think the current formula works very well. The beauty of the whole thing is that you can run a $600 kit. It's not illegal. It's just more embarrasing when someone dust you with a TC3.

I might add that getting to this point was like passing kidney stones so lets enjoy the nice well established rule set. Thanks Robk for making the right hard choices.
snoopyrc is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 12:16 PM
  #12495  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
StarrRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 678
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by snoopyrc
I think the current formula works very well. The beauty of the whole thing is that you can run a $600 kit. It's not illegal. It's just more embarrasing when someone dust you with a TC3.

I might add that getting to this point was like passing kidney stones so lets enjoy the nice well established rule set. Thanks Robk for making the right hard choices.
+1 +1 +1

Ditto on the Thank You to Robk for all his dedication and steadfast direction, keep it up, "steady as she goes".
StarrRacing is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.