Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing >

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2009, 02:58 AM
  #4156  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
SWTour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hot Mountains of S.E. Arizona
Posts: 3,014
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

ROAR RULES

Something some people forget about, or maybe don't even know...

a club or track that is ROAR sanctioned is NOT limited to running classes, products, etc. that are ROAR 'legal'

Clubs and tracks that carry a ROAR sanction have to abide by certain saftey standards & insure all competitors are ROAR members in order to be covered by the ROAR ins. policy, however that does not preclude them from creating, shaping and modifying rules to be used to benefit their local or regional racing.

ROAR Rules must be enforced at HIGHER level "SANCTIONED" competition events, such as Regional Championships or National Events, but even for these events variances can be granted to NON-CONFORMING classes. However, at those events the rules sanctioned classes must also be offered.

So, with THAT being said...under ROAR Sanction a local club can at their descretion allow a battery such as the ORION 2400 to be used at the club level events if they so desire, and make it know that product is being allowed.

For more info on that, you can contact Dawn Sanchez (ROAR President)
SWTour is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 06:11 AM
  #4157  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (261)
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,380
Trader Rating: 261 (100%+)
Default

I'm truly aware that ROAR allow (and actively encourage) deviation from many of their rules in the interest of supporting club-level racing. My concern is more with the insurance underwriters/adjusters and my more general understanding of how THEY work.

The LiPo batteries are one of the only (THE only?) item that ROAR safety tests prior to approval. Now I know it's a LOOOOOONG stretch, but what if a non-ROAR approved LiPo has a catastrophic failure and causes personal injury or property damage? The VERY first thing the adjusters will comb for are "out's", situations that may have been present that mitigate or eliminate their obligation to pay. They comb the entry list for drivers who aren't ROAR members. You KNOW they'd want the battery at the heart of the problem and would be comparing it with the approved batteries on ROAR's list. What is the status of the claim if it ISN'T on ROAR's approved list? Don't know? Me either. My concern is, though, that I don't have the money in my pocket to cover re-building the Shrine Auditorium (nor do any of the folks I race with) where we race and you can bet that their attorney will be naming names on their lawsuit to have the damages covered. You can also bet my name would be right near the top of the list since I'm the person in the club who is their direct contact and makes all our scheduling and other arrangements with them.

Again, is this a LIKELY scenario? Nope. Is it possible? Absolutely. Can the question/concern be eliminated without any undue injury to anyone? Yup...just require that everyone's LiPo battery is on the approved list and that ALL charging and other safety requirements specified for LiPo batteries(containment device, buckets of sand, tech for voltage, etc) are followed. As long as the rules are enforced evenly and consistently there's no one at any sort of disadvantage from them, competitively or economically.

We have, as a club, had this very discussion. We allow non-ROAR approved 19T motors, for example, but we have decided as a group that as far as LiPo batteries we have to stick to the ROAR list. To do otherwise exposes us (as limited as that exposure may be) unneccessarily to financial loss.

I will talk to Dawn, though, and the insurance representative and see if I can get WRITTEN clarification on the above. I'm kind of doubting we'd get anything of that nature from the insurance folks, and nice as Dawn is, her word over the internet or even on paper isn't an obligation for the insurance carriers.
Scottrik is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 06:54 AM
  #4158  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
Racer X79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cocoa, FL
Posts: 416
Trader Rating: 31 (100%+)
Default

Very good points about the non-roar lipo's, I never thought about it from a insurance/liability stand point. The point I was trying to make was that it would be nice to have a readily availible low cost lipo for the beginners (and those on a tight budget switiching to lipo from nimh) without going through mail order. I'm a firm beliver on supporting the local hobby shop/race track whenever possible.
Racer X79 is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 09:01 AM
  #4159  
Tech Addict
 
speedsterblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 690
Default

Bite the bullet and buy roar approved packs. Be 100% usvta compliant and no worries. I personally wouldn't buy a 2400 pack cause I have to add enough lead already...
speedsterblade is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 10:33 AM
  #4160  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
IndyRC_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,358
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

This link contains some photos from the Snowbirds. There are some good pictures of VTA cars in action from Thursday.

http://rcactionpics.com/2009/rcactio..._thursday.html
IndyRC_Racer is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 12:02 PM
  #4161  
Tech Elite
 
chicagokenji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,210
Default

I wonder what class this is?

http://rcactionpics.com/thursday/sno...ursday_396.jpg
chicagokenji is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 12:36 PM
  #4162  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (17)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 231
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default It's S/K

Originally Posted by chicagokenji

It's the S/K oval spec oval class.

Here's a link to the rules http://shop.kskts.com/product.sc?cat...7&productId=49

http://www.snowbirdnationals.com/ClassPressRelease.htm
billb60 is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 03:47 PM
  #4163  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (75)
 
squarehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 4,210
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Racer X79
It's true that the 2400 Orion is not ROAR approved, but is it going to out perform anything else that is ROAR approved? I would hope that if someone showed up with one to race VTA that they would'nt get turned away.
Originally Posted by Scottrik
The problem is that once you start making exceptions for this or that you've started down the slippery slope that manages to kill pretty much every racing program that starts down it. Next it's motors. Then the tires (those HPI tires/wheels sure are expensive...). I think Doug sees that and will maintain a steady hand on the tiller.
What the ROAR clause in our rules is for is to keep out the cheap, bottom end Chinese/eBay/flea market LiPo packs that generally are the cause of the LiPo fear, uncertainty and doubt in this hobby. It was not the intention to eliminate quality entry-level LiPo packs, and quite honestly, up until a couple of months ago, I wasn't even aware that the Orion 2400 pack was not ROAR approved. That actually caught me off guard, as I had been recommending these packs for entry level VTA racers. I should know better.

However, they are entry-level starter LiPo packs—not really racing packs—but for $30 and the low output, who should complain about them? If anyone dipping their feet into the shallow end of the LiPo conversion wants to try them, I don't see any harm in the usage for local USVTA racing. They aren't going to be a performance advantage (but you had better make weight with them). The batteries in the USVTA rules—unlike tires, bodies and the 21.5 motor—are not specified parts, and are open to racer's choice, under the 5000mah ceiling.

So until the ROAR LiPo clause mysteriously disappears from our rules (I'd like to not have to reply on other organizations and approvals for our rules, if at all possible), let's say that the official-unofficial USVTA position on the Orion/Peak 2400 pack is that they are not approved by the letter of the rule, but they are legitimate for USVTA racing. How's that for a political answer?


The only thing I would say for sure is don't bring one to the Nationals (or any other big race, for that matter) in April if you are using one at local races.
squarehead is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 06:39 PM
  #4164  
Tech Master
iTrader: (86)
 
BIG JIM WOODMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Guthrie OK
Posts: 1,374
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default WATCH OUT!

I believe I just read something that sounded alot like a trip down the slippery slope! If you allow Orion 2400s then what is next any 21.5. Clubs should do and usually do what they want . That does not need to be sanctioned by a bend in the official rules. Apex, you have been a strong leader here. You have bent but not broken. Stand firm!
BIG JIM WOODMAN is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 06:53 PM
  #4165  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (75)
 
squarehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 4,210
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

If a 12-year old kid shows up at a club race with a 2400 Orion, are you going to tell him to go home?
squarehead is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 07:04 PM
  #4166  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (261)
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,380
Trader Rating: 261 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ApexSpeed
If a 12-year old kid shows up at a club race with a 2400 Orion, are you going to tell him to go home?
Nope...one of us would loan him (or her) a battery so they can RACE!!
Scottrik is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 07:24 PM
  #4167  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (75)
 
squarehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 4,210
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

I'm sorry, I don't see how informally allowing a lesser capacity, cheap battery pack by a globally accepted company destroys the integrity of the class on a club level.





That's just me, I could be wrong.
squarehead is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 07:40 PM
  #4168  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (261)
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,380
Trader Rating: 261 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ApexSpeed
I'm sorry, I don't see how informally allowing a lesser capacity, cheap battery pack by a globally accepted company destroys the integrity of the class on a club level.





That's just me, I could be wrong.
As written above, our concern is more from a liability standpoint. Not a huge risk, to be sure, but one that we've elected to eliminate. If you're insured via other means I see no problem...other than how do you tell one kid "you can't run this non-approved battery...it's a cheap Chinese knock-off, or at least I think it is..." when you're allowing someone else to run a non-approved battery. Yeah, the Orions are probably the highest quality battery in RC (or as high as anybody), even the non-approved 2400, but a very clear line has suddenly become vague because enough people whine loud and long enough?
Scottrik is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 08:26 PM
  #4169  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
miller tyme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,005
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ApexSpeed
I'm sorry, I don't see how informally allowing a lesser capacity, cheap battery pack by a globally accepted company destroys the integrity of the class on a club level.

That's just me, I could be wrong.
Rules are Rules,
What If I had A cheap lesser quality non approved 21.5 could I run it. The line needs drawn and adhered too for all, any inconsistency leave the door open for the next deviation.
miller tyme is offline  
Old 01-30-2009, 08:27 PM
  #4170  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ApexSpeed
If a 12-year old kid shows up at a club race with a 2400 Orion, are you going to tell him to go home?
I would just let him race, but I dont see anything wrong with loaning him a pack either.

I dont see how letting that battery has anything to do with the door for other 21.5 motors either.
snoopyrc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.