Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
ROAR B/L motor Rules debate thread >

ROAR B/L motor Rules debate thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

ROAR B/L motor Rules debate thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2008, 03:21 PM
  #976  
Tech Champion
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
C_O_jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wa.
Posts: 9,055
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

George Cherry is hiding in that turtle shell,
He will still complain that ROAR won't allow handout transponders,
that was his excuse for not running the 06 offroad nats in his own back yard!
C_O_jones is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 03:24 PM
  #977  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
f1larry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Buffalo Grove, IL
Posts: 2,268
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by convikt
FDR at 4.44 is what I used (rubber tire on ozite) and it could eaisly take more I am a huge fan of this motor. If you get in the low to mid 5's it is very anemic and slow motion like (Im sure others that know me will vouch for that from last night)
I beleive that at the USTCC (Novak race) Charlie suggested a FDR of 4.0 for the 17.5 motors.
f1larry is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:28 PM
  #978  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Verndog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PPDBillet.com USA
Posts: 1,845
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rick Hohwart
Now it is up to racers and race promotoers to only allow "legal" BL motors in their racing programs.
Sorry to see you post this after Dawn has said over and over that they encourage local racing programs to fine tune their programs to what the racers are asking for (and running) on their home tracks. Maybe the new rules are a decent "guide" at many tracks, and maybe they dont work so well at others. Combine that with the fact you (LRP) and Novak sold us on 27T equivelents that are not on the list this year (13.5), and 10.5's that are not "legal" next year except mod.

So...in the local programs....who does conforming to the new "legal" motors REALLY benifit$$$
Verndog is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:33 PM
  #979  
Tech Master
iTrader: (27)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,038
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by f1larry
I beleive that at the USTCC (Novak race) Charlie suggested a FDR of 4.0 for the 17.5 motors.
right! I know it will take more, but thats what I used on a tight carpet track.
convikt is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:38 PM
  #980  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Bob-Stormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Glasgow, Montana USA
Posts: 3,524
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Shame we didn't take the initiative to slow the classes down a few percent. But, it is what it is.

See ya at the track.
Bob-Stormer is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:41 PM
  #981  
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 3,273
Default

Originally Posted by C_O_jones
George Cherry is hiding in that turtle shell,
He will still complain that ROAR won't allow handout transponders,
that was his excuse for not running the 06 offroad nats in his own back yard!

I sent him the link to the membership form to download. But... maybe he's waiting a few days for the online membership registration to become available..... I'm sure that's it.
Dawn Sanchez is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 04:54 PM
  #982  
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
mkdut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: RC Retired
Posts: 1,961
Trader Rating: 19 (100%+)
Default

I can already see George's argument for not joining: He does not agree with 8.3.2.7.4.3. He through his research conducted at the George Cherry Lipo Research Institute has deemed it safe to charge at higher amps and therefore will not be subjugated by ROAR's guidance. That and no hand out transponders as Mr Hugh G C_O_Jones stated.
mkdut is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 05:07 PM
  #983  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (101)
 
corallyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonds, Wash
Posts: 4,707
Trader Rating: 101 (100%+)
Default

Dawn,

Can you clarify something for me. Regarding ROAR's new rules about rotor size, (the 12.4mm +/-), that is only for Stock and Super Stock correct? For Mod you can still use small and large rotors right? Is there a Max and Min size for open Mod?

Thanks,
Steve
corallyman is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 05:14 PM
  #984  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (6)
 
sheetmetal2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 248
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default 13.5

Originally Posted by xtreameracer
how much faster is a 13.5 bonded rotor than a 27 turn, is it close . i know that the 13.5 sintered is faster.
We run a bonded rotor in a touring car and the speeds are very compairable to the stock 27T motors that are there. We have been allowing all 13.5's run with the 27Ts and actually we have had a toss up as far as which cars with which motors have had the fastest laps.
sheetmetal2 is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 06:40 PM
  #985  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (14)
 
skypilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,671
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mkdut
I can already see George's argument for not joining: He does not agree with 8.3.2.7.4.3. He through his research conducted at the George Cherry Lipo Research Institute has deemed it safe to charge at higher amps and therefore will not be subjugated by ROAR's guidance. That and no hand out transponders as Mr Hugh G C_O_Jones stated.
you forgot the lipo sack requirement, lots of "outs" for him ride on.
skypilot is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 06:56 PM
  #986  
Tech Legend
 
Wild Cherry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: TRCR Modified Driver
Posts: 22,595
Default

Originally Posted by mkdut
I can already see George's argument for not joining: He does not agree with 8.3.2.7.4.3. He through his research conducted at the George Cherry Lipo Research Institute has deemed it safe to charge at higher amps and therefore will not be subjugated by ROAR's guidance. That and no hand out transponders as Mr Hugh G C_O_Jones stated.

Still nothing in the rules say I can`t charge @ a higher amp rate ..


Its overcharging that is against the rules...


and


think of some other`s reason`s because none of those I find acceptable...

and
CoJones
I did`nt go because I quit racing stock or spec class`s , still the same to this day(Mod & Nitro only)

Dawn, I`ll put membership in the mail tomorrow as I promise ....
Wild Cherry is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 07:01 PM
  #987  
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 3,273
Default

Originally Posted by corallyman
Dawn,

Can you clarify something for me. Regarding ROAR's new rules about rotor size, (the 12.4mm +/-), that is only for Stock and Super Stock correct? For Mod you can still use small and large rotors right? Is there a Max and Min size for open Mod?

Thanks,
Steve
If I understand our new rules correctly - please remember, these came from a year long research study with MFG's and a committee selected to write the rules... I am just now learning specifics and understanding the engineer speak. (Lipo was much more difficult to get to sink in.. LOL)

Modified: Min diameter 12.0mm and max 15.5mm
Stock/Super Stock: 12.4mm +/-0.11
Dawn Sanchez is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 07:24 PM
  #988  
wyd
Tech Legend
iTrader: (51)
 
wyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Castle Mamba Max Pro. Feel its power!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 21,220
Trader Rating: 51 (100%+)
Default

I just can't figure out if the new rules just came out for brushless motors how could a company have ones that conform perfectly to rules that just came out. Chances of having everything single thing perfect is about slim and non.

If it took a year to due the rules it is impossible that any motor company should have motors that fit these rules as soon as they come out because over that year the rules would be every changing til they are finalized. Again seems strange to me.

To everything perfect like that means I would be playing the lottery thats for sure.
wyd is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 07:44 PM
  #989  
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 3,273
Default

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry

Dawn, I`ll put membership in the mail tomorrow as I promise ....
I'll be looking for it.

and, charging a lipo at 1 amp per 1000 mah is recommended.. anything more is just, silly. Read the general information document on the website... explains it pretty well...
Dawn Sanchez is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 08:12 PM
  #990  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
Verndog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: PPDBillet.com USA
Posts: 1,845
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dawn Sanchez
.. anything more is just, silly.
Now your starting to understand him.

Hey Dawn...I can see your work is now done here...Cherry has officially modified his sig to remove the legalize LiPo spew.
Verndog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.