Bore vs Stroke vs Displacement
#1
Bore vs Stroke vs Displacement
Code:
Engine Bore Stoke Disp. ------ ----- ------ ----- Team Orion Wasp Rev 13.80 14.00 2.094 OS TZ Speed Tuned 13.80 14.00 2.094 OS TZ 13.80 14.00 2.094 JP Racing FX-03 13.80 14.04 2.100 Novarossi LL3 13.70 14.25 2.101 Sirio STI 14.00 13.70 2.109 GRP Ninja 14.02 13.79 2.129
Thanks!
Answers.com:
- Undersquare: http://www.answers.com/topic/undersquare
- Oversquare: http://www.answers.com/topic/oversquare
Formula used to calculate displacement:
Displacement = (PI/4 * Bore^2 * stroke) / 1000
If I need to use a different formula, please let me know.
#2
Originally Posted by rmdhawaii
Code:
Engine Bore Stoke Disp. ------ ----- ------ ----- Team Orion Wasp Rev 13.80 14.00 2.094 OS TZ Speed Tuned 13.80 14.00 2.094 OS TZ 13.80 14.00 2.094 JP Racing FX-03 13.80 14.04 2.100 Novarossi LL3 13.70 14.25 2.101 Sirio STI 14.00 13.70 2.109 GRP Ninja 14.02 13.79 2.129
Thanks!
Answers.com:
- Undersquare: http://www.answers.com/topic/undersquare
- Oversquare: http://www.answers.com/topic/oversquare
Formula used to calculate displacement:
Displacement = (PI/4 * Bore^2 * stroke) / 1000
If I need to use a different formula, please let me know.
Force which is pushing piston down is equal to pressure multiply on piston top area. So bigger diameter means more force will be pushing piston down. So base on your links and force you can make your decision. Also as a tip, I iwll recomend use timing calculator to calculate engine capacity ( you will not need to use formula). Timing calculator you can find http://www.palmarisracing.com/Timing_Calculator.htm
I hope I was helpfull.
#4
Originally Posted by nitrodude
Does it mean that a bigger bore will give you more torque? Or am I looking at it the wrong way?
#5
Originally Posted by EdwardN
In reasonble limits yes. About 1% in force, make math, pressure is about 85 Kg sm^2. But defenetly we have to take to concideration all other variables as strock, connecting rod ratio (with shorter strock we can make connecting rod shorter) etc. Answer is Yes.
Thanks for answering my questions. I'm slowing but surely getting smarter.
I know Robert... "Get the STI!"
#6
Originally Posted by EdwardN
You have pretty much answer on your question with those links. I just want to add:
Force which is pushing piston down is equal to pressure multiply on piston top area. So bigger diameter means more force will be pushing piston down. So base on your links and force you can make your decision. Also as a tip, I iwll recomend use timing calculator to calculate engine capacity ( you will not need to use formula). Timing calculator you can find http://www.palmarisracing.com/Timing_Calculator.htm
I hope I was helpfull.
Force which is pushing piston down is equal to pressure multiply on piston top area. So bigger diameter means more force will be pushing piston down. So base on your links and force you can make your decision. Also as a tip, I iwll recomend use timing calculator to calculate engine capacity ( you will not need to use formula). Timing calculator you can find http://www.palmarisracing.com/Timing_Calculator.htm
I hope I was helpfull.
How are you ?
The BRB p/s/r is doing very well
#7
Tech Adept
Get the STI. There's more than enough torque and it just keeps on revving. I find where other engines reach max revs (on 200ft straights), the STI just keeps on accelerating. If only the straight was longer...
Dave
Dave
#8
So if all are motors are supposed to be limited to 2.1cc how does Sirio and GRP get away with a slightly larger displacement?
BTW anyone have an on track performance comparison between the ll3 & ls3? I have both and although the ll3 is supposed to have more torq mine feels as though it revs higher with the same torq but and a slower spool up than my LS3, is it just my tune or are others getting the same result?
Mark
BTW anyone have an on track performance comparison between the ll3 & ls3? I have both and although the ll3 is supposed to have more torq mine feels as though it revs higher with the same torq but and a slower spool up than my LS3, is it just my tune or are others getting the same result?
Mark
#9
Originally Posted by mtveten
So if all are motors are supposed to be limited to 2.1cc how does Sirio and GRP get away with a slightly larger displacement?
Mark
Mark
#10
Originally Posted by EdwardN
In reasonble limits yes. About 1% in force, make math, pressure is about 85 Kg sm^2. But defenetly we have to take to concideration all other variables as strock, connecting rod ratio (with shorter strock we can make connecting rod shorter) etc. Answer is Yes.
#11
Mark: This is what Uriah had to say...
Originally Posted by Grinder
The LL3 will have a torquier feel than the LS3. The LS3 powerband comes on smoother than the LL3. The LS3 is happier at high revs, than the LL3. LL3 can be a little trickier to tune, and seems to run slightly warmer than LS3. Overall performance, I would say both are similar, just different powerbands. Both are extremely fast.
#12
Originally Posted by DaRollaRacer
Get the STI. There's more than enough torque and it just keeps on revving. I find where other engines reach max revs (on 200ft straights), the STI just keeps on accelerating. If only the straight was longer...
Dave
Dave
I'm 99% sure that I'm going to get the STI, but I just need to be absolutely sure it has the most potential to take out the JPs. I know that my tuning, setup and driving need to do the rest. As my knowledge grows, I have a tendency of changing my mind about what I want to get. I guess it's all part of the discovery and learning process.
I made one bad engine choice this year (nothing having to do with competing against the JPs BTW) and I don't want to make another.
Now that my TZ issues have been worked out, I'm pretty happy with it. I really like the low-to-mid range powerband. It makes it easy to drive fast on our track.
Just FYI Edward, this is the track I race on:
- Picture - It's not L shaped BTW
- Video - Both leaders are running MTX-4s w/JPs.
#13
Hmmmm... More interesting info...
Check out the graph guys....
http://www.axialracing.com/details.p...imgID=1&type=2
mxwrench!
Code:
Engine Bore Stoke Disp. ------ ----- ------ ----- Axial.12RR Spec 1 13.76 14.00 2.082
http://www.axialracing.com/details.p...imgID=1&type=2
mxwrench!
#14
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
Originally Posted by rmdhawaii
Thanks Dave. I know you guys are giving me a solid recommendation.
I'm 99% sure that I'm going to get the STI, but I just need to be absolutely sure it has the most potential to take out the JPs. I know that my tuning, setup and driving need to do the rest. As my knowledge grows, I have a tendency of changing my mind about what I want to get. I guess it's all part of the discovery and learning process.
I made one bad engine choice this year (nothing having to do with competing against the JPs BTW) and I don't want to make another.
Now that my TZ issues have been worked out, I'm pretty happy with it. I really like the low-to-mid range powerband. It makes it easy to drive fast on our track.
Just FYI Edward, this is the track I race on:
- Picture - It's not L shaped BTW
- Video - Both leaders are running MTX-4s w/JPs.
I'm 99% sure that I'm going to get the STI, but I just need to be absolutely sure it has the most potential to take out the JPs. I know that my tuning, setup and driving need to do the rest. As my knowledge grows, I have a tendency of changing my mind about what I want to get. I guess it's all part of the discovery and learning process.
I made one bad engine choice this year (nothing having to do with competing against the JPs BTW) and I don't want to make another.
Now that my TZ issues have been worked out, I'm pretty happy with it. I really like the low-to-mid range powerband. It makes it easy to drive fast on our track.
Just FYI Edward, this is the track I race on:
- Picture - It's not L shaped BTW
- Video - Both leaders are running MTX-4s w/JPs.
#15
Tech Adept
Yeah, another one thing that I failed to mention in my previous post (Osiris nailed it) is that the STI's powerband is really smooth (This, of course, does not mean that it isn't powerful). It makes for easy driving.
Dave
Dave