Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Associated TC5 >

Team Associated TC5

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Team Associated TC5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2008, 10:00 AM
  #8131  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
xtrememadness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 991
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

hey everyone. we just got 2 itf chassis at my hobby shop. i went to put one on my car and i noticed that i couldnt tighten my bulkheads. upon further inspection i found that the chassis is countersunk two deep and the countersunk part of the screw sticks above the chassis. both chassis are this way. has anyone else had this problem? maybe josh or rick can shed some light. are they just defective maybe? thanx alot
xtrememadness is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 01:11 PM
  #8132  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
jag88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,156
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by PartTime
Your xray is fast enough. I think you should just stick to that.

DK

Yea, your the one that got me thinkin' that way ....... but I'll give it another chance this Tuesday.
jag88 is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 03:40 PM
  #8133  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wauconda, Illinois
Posts: 642
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Extrememadness
Do to the ITF chassis plates being a little thinner, the counter sunk screws will be exposed more.
All I did was take a counter sink tool and do the bulkheads slightly. That should fix your problem and it will NOT hurt the threaded portion at all.
Bob Oaks
bob o is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 04:58 PM
  #8134  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
xtrememadness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 991
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

that will work but im wondering if the chassis is too thin in those areas now because this isnt a problem in the tc5r kits or are the bulkheads countersunk in the kits. im just wondering if there was a screw up on the chassis because they seem to be ok in the rubber car kits
xtrememadness is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 06:38 AM
  #8135  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Takt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 901
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Josh H
start with an 88 spur and a 40 or 41 pinion for the novak race.........hunt me down when you get there and we will get you figured out.
Went out and bought an 88 spur ... and tried the 41 ... and I couldn't get mesh. I would need a 5 tooth larger pinion. What did I do wrong?
Takt is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 07:05 AM
  #8136  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
PartTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sterling hts MI
Posts: 1,029
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jag88
Yea, your the one that got me thinkin' that way ....... but I'll give it another chance this Tuesday.
Cool, see you tue.

DK
PartTime is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 07:07 AM
  #8137  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,789
Trader Rating: 3 (80%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Takt
Went out and bought an 88 spur ... and tried the 41 ... and I couldn't get mesh. I would need a 5 tooth larger pinion. What did I do wrong?
That looks to be a mistake on my part.........A 98 spur and 46 pinion will definitly work
Josh Hohnstein is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 07:16 AM
  #8138  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 10,278
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

I've been running a 94t spur in both 17.5 and 13.5 foam classes. I think a smaller spur is needed for 17.5 when using a pinion larger than 56t - you run out of space when tightening the motor.
hanulec is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 09:51 AM
  #8139  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
xtrememadness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 991
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

has anyone else had the countersinking problem on the itf chassis. just wondering if i should send it back or modify the bulkheads. thanx
xtrememadness is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 01:13 PM
  #8140  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 95
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by xtrememadness
has anyone else had the countersinking problem on the itf chassis. just wondering if i should send it back or modify the bulkheads. thanx
Use a shorter screw. Mine is flush and perfect. No need to mod anything.
naggalowmo is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 01:39 PM
  #8141  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
AdrianM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Saint Petersburg, FL
Posts: 5,943
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by xtrememadness
hey everyone. we just got 2 itf chassis at my hobby shop. i went to put one on my car and i noticed that i couldnt tighten my bulkheads. upon further inspection i found that the chassis is countersunk two deep and the countersunk part of the screw sticks above the chassis. both chassis are this way. has anyone else had this problem? maybe josh or rick can shed some light. are they just defective maybe? thanx alot
The ITF Chassis is 2mm thick. When any company countersinks 2mm carbon they can choose to partially countersink and let all the screw heads stick out the bottom of the chassis or make them flush and have part of the scews taper pop out the top of the chassis and hit all the alloy parts. If they chose the latter you will need to get a countersink and relieve the bottom of all the alloy parts that screw to the chassis if the manufacturer has not done so already.
AdrianM is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 01:49 PM
  #8142  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
mr crum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: tampa florida 813
Posts: 1,591
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

hey guys im having trouble with breaking bone blades i know the ultimate way to quit from breaking them is to not hit stuff but im not that good so does anybody make a spool that doesnt take bone blades or should i run the slipper spool thanks in advance for the help
mr crum is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 04:08 PM
  #8143  
Tech Master
iTrader: (42)
 
islander360's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,248
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

Mr crum,

I recommend running the slipper spool.

Originally Posted by mr crum
hey guys im having trouble with breaking bone blades i know the ultimate way to quit from breaking them is to not hit stuff but im not that good so does anybody make a spool that doesnt take bone blades or should i run the slipper spool thanks in advance for the help
islander360 is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 04:42 PM
  #8144  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
xtrememadness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 991
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

thanx adrian. i agree with you, but i just dont think you should have to do this modification. it should of been done by associated unless its a defect. i cant imagine associated expecting everyone with a rubber kit and itf chassis to have to counter sink a relief in the bulkheads. for example the tamiya 415msxx has a 2mm chassis and the screws fit flush and perfect so maybe they just need screws with a smaller countersunk shoulder?? i mean its no big deal for me cause i have access to a machine shop but alot of people might not or have the countersink bit. just my 2 cents.
xtrememadness is offline  
Old 12-21-2008, 04:59 PM
  #8145  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
mr crum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: tampa florida 813
Posts: 1,591
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by islander360
Mr crum,

I recommend running the slipper spool.
thanks sherwin other than that ive been workin on getting smoother i kept breaking rear hubs but i moved the camber link to the whole further out on the wheel so the force is more up and down instead of the whole closest to the bulkhead thats where i had it when they kept breaking
mr crum is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.