Durango DEX210 Thread
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
Does anyone know how much longer a dest210 chassis is compared to a dex210 +8 chassis
Thanks
Tim
Thanks
Tim
B fast does have the diff balls for the Durango but i wish they have a complete diff . Me personally cant stand that dumb C- clip.
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
Tim
Actually does the B4.1 ball diff work for this buggy the Type B transmission case or a B5 ball diff ? The outdrives to .
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
I'm pretty sure the b4 diff with Durango diff gear works with shims for side to side play. I've almost done it and might once my diff needs a rebuild using the MIP super diff for the b4 with the Durango diff fear and 3mm diff balls
..
Tech Legend
iTrader: (294)
got in some track time with the dex210 vehicle I have here. it has a variety of upgrades but whatever turnbuckles were used in the rear were garbage. So looking for whatever replaced the ones i have on my vehicle in the front.
they are dark gray in color and the previous owner went with a ball stud and ball cup setup that isn't a direct pass through like the durangos, these won't come off.
So any ideas on that let me know. I'll post pics later.
Anyway, so ran carpet onroad with my dex210 and once I figured out the tire situation, which was clay slicks it worked excellent, even though I am using the plastic dime chassis.
I do want to tune more, the slipper I need to lock up I am thinking for more punch, also, trying to decide on some springs.
Do the AE springs fit the durango shocks fine or is it better to stick with durango springs?
Also, I do have the avid setup here, but if there is a slipper eliminator that works with the stock spurs I am all ears.
lastly, I used the 4 gear mid setup, adn one of thing things I was fighting before changing tires was off power hook in turns. It seemed to really want come around as soon as you let off.
now, the tires appeared to fix it, but I am wondering if a 3 gear setup would have been easier to drive in general?
On turnbuckles, looking at the lunsford kit it appears it just uses 50mm turnbuckles all around with there ball cups.
My ball studs measure at 4.8mm so I am thinking using the 50mm turnbuckles and the ones that look longer (ball cups) just cut down or fine some cups in my part bin that are shorter.
they are dark gray in color and the previous owner went with a ball stud and ball cup setup that isn't a direct pass through like the durangos, these won't come off.
So any ideas on that let me know. I'll post pics later.
Anyway, so ran carpet onroad with my dex210 and once I figured out the tire situation, which was clay slicks it worked excellent, even though I am using the plastic dime chassis.
I do want to tune more, the slipper I need to lock up I am thinking for more punch, also, trying to decide on some springs.
Do the AE springs fit the durango shocks fine or is it better to stick with durango springs?
Also, I do have the avid setup here, but if there is a slipper eliminator that works with the stock spurs I am all ears.
lastly, I used the 4 gear mid setup, adn one of thing things I was fighting before changing tires was off power hook in turns. It seemed to really want come around as soon as you let off.
now, the tires appeared to fix it, but I am wondering if a 3 gear setup would have been easier to drive in general?
On turnbuckles, looking at the lunsford kit it appears it just uses 50mm turnbuckles all around with there ball cups.
My ball studs measure at 4.8mm so I am thinking using the 50mm turnbuckles and the ones that look longer (ball cups) just cut down or fine some cups in my part bin that are shorter.
Last edited by Cain; 02-05-2015 at 09:17 PM.
Tech Regular
Dino, how many times are you going to keep saying that? You are 175,000% WRONG!
4 gear always behaves like 4 gear in MM or RM. 3 gear always behaves like 3 gear in MM or RM. 4 gear ALWAYS transfers more weight. 3 gear ALWAYs feels more neutral. RM or MM is 100% irrelevant!!!
How many more times do I have to repeat this???????????
4 gear always behaves like 4 gear in MM or RM. 3 gear always behaves like 3 gear in MM or RM. 4 gear ALWAYS transfers more weight. 3 gear ALWAYs feels more neutral. RM or MM is 100% irrelevant!!!
How many more times do I have to repeat this???????????
Surely its what dino said, if you have it in rm3 for example and just spin the gearbox around and use mm3, you are putting the motor on the other side, mm4 and rm3 have more weight transfer, and mm3 and rm4 are more neutral with less weight transfer (according to the original 210 page on the TD site).
You should look at the differences between mm3 and rm 3. The motor is physically on the same side of the vehicle. Because the motor is on the same side the motor IS NOT on the same side of the gear box when comparing mm3 to rm3. In 3 gear the endbell will be facing the drivers side of the car with the pinion on the passenger side. In 4 gear the endbell will be on the passenger side with the pinion on the drivers side. It DOES NOT MATTER if it is built mm or rm. When looking at 3 gear the rotation of the motor is in the same direction, toward the rear of the car, same direction the wheels would turn if they are turning in reverse.
Someone smart once said that every action has an opposite and equal reaction. So what does that mean? If the motor is spinning in the same direction as the wheels in reverse, something that is holding it (the motor mount) has a force on it that is opposite and equal to the torque that the motor has. This force is applied to the front of the motor, no matter if its mm or rm.
In rm3 the force is applied to the rear axles because the rear axles are in front of the motor. In mm3 the force is applied to the area in front of the motor. The rear of the car will still squat, but not as much as rm3 will make it squat. This is because rm3 has more leverage than mm3 because of the placement of the force on the chassis. The force is applied to a point that is further towards the rear of the chassis.
Picture this, put you finger on the rear axle and push down, now push with the same force two inches in front of the rear axle. In which spot did the rear suspension compress more? Obviously it did when you pushed on the rear axle, because of the leverage that you had on the chassis.
Now the same is true with 4 gear. In 4 gear the rotation of the motor is in the same direction as the wheels going forward no matter if it is mm4 or rm4. Now because the motor is rotating forward the force is to the rear of the motor. So in rm 4 the force will be at the rear of the car. This will have more leverage on the car than any other configuration simply because of the location of the motor. In mm4 the force will be applied to almost the same spot that rm3 applies it but because of the direction of the rotation of the motor the force will be greater than the force made by rm3.
It has taken me a while to figure this all out and sometimes it is hard because of all the hearsay on the subject and also because of racers having to be pc for the companies they collect money from.
Hope this helps
Tim
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
Dino, how many times are you going to keep saying that? You are 175,000% WRONG!
4 gear always behaves like 4 gear in MM or RM. 3 gear always behaves like 3 gear in MM or RM. 4 gear ALWAYS transfers more weight. 3 gear ALWAYs feels more neutral. RM or MM is 100% irrelevant!!!
How many more times do I have to repeat this???????????
4 gear always behaves like 4 gear in MM or RM. 3 gear always behaves like 3 gear in MM or RM. 4 gear ALWAYS transfers more weight. 3 gear ALWAYs feels more neutral. RM or MM is 100% irrelevant!!!
How many more times do I have to repeat this???????????
Fred you have a lot of great knowledge however in this case I think something is missing. Inertia follows rotational direction not number of gears. Number of gears changes the direction of rotation, this is the critical factor. You have two large masses that can either rotate in concert or in opposition. The motor and the transmission+wheels. Take all the RM/MM/3gears/4gear…. BS away and simply look at mass and direction of rotation. How many spinning masses do you have and how heavy are they. Are they all spinning and more importantly accelerating in the same direction? Same calculation for any kind of inertia. F = mA. Notice that Dino also mentions motor rotation as it is possible to reverse the direction at the ESC level. This means the usual ideas are further complicated.
You will have almost zero control on the air over the attitude of the car (front to back) with a neutral setup like standard MM3/RM4. When I say neutral I mean when the motor and transmission inertias are canceling their respective energies. Sometimes this is ok. Especially if you aren't dealing with a lot of jumps.
This is easily tested. Take you car and hold it in your hand fully ready to go. Hold the car in the middle under the chassis so you are free of the wheels. Give it some throttle, the car should shift it's weight to the rear and rotate the front wheels up. Now give it full brake. The front wheels should go down opposite of what happens with throttle. This is essentially what happens on the track and in the air over jumps especially. This effect is greatly reduced with a more neutral orientation of motor and transmission.
I'm glad to see this discussion fleshed out even more, I hope we can all be nice and try to learn from each other
REMEMBER YOU DO NOT FULLY UNDERSTAND A CONCEPT UNLESS YOU CAN EFFECTIVELY SHARE IT!
Last edited by 13Maschine; 02-07-2015 at 09:00 AM.
Tech Addict
iTrader: (10)
How would you convert the v1 rear shock tower so you can the shocks in the rear? I just got the v1 today and im really excited about it! Idk were to start shock wise and stuff. Im running on an indoor clay track thats somewhat loose