R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - Team Associated RC10 B5m Mid-Motor & Rear Motor Thread
Old 04-01-2014, 06:34 AM
  #3014  
Bob Barry
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,616
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by celt
In a power limited class, lighter is better in most every case, as all things are bound by gravitational rules when existing on a large mass like earth.

You can argue that reducing rotating mass is more important than static weight. However, reducing both is important. A heavier car takes more energy to push around and greater rotating mass takes more energy to spool up and down. Unless you are operating a gristmill, you want less rotating mass.



Remember, there is a difference between arguing static weight and proper weight bias.

Can anyone give an example in modern car racing where there is a weight maximum rule?
yeah I know. I just wanted to point out that a lighter car is not ALWAYS a better car. I know when I eventually build a 17.5 car, I really don't care much about the overall weight. I'm going to focus on drive train, because as you stated, rotating mass = everything.
Bob Barry is offline