Originally Posted by
EDWARD2003
Damper tubes vs. Shock side-damper
Which one is the better choice for consistent handling thought out a race?
The reason I ask is, I was reading up on David Spashetts opinions on damper tubes and he mentioned damper tubes are very inconsistent after 30 seconds of consistent use. If so, then why do manufactures continue to use them in their kits? Why did team associated do away with their shock-side damper for damper tubes? I noticed Yokomo is still holding on to their shock side damper.
What are your thoughts on the two?
Damper tubes are light, cheap to manufacture, and have low stiction. They also require more maintenance, at least in dirty conditions.
Piston-style dampers are heavier, more expensive to manufacture, and have higher stiction. But they need less maintenance.
I think the handling consistency is dependent on the individual damper or tube. A damper with high stiction is going to make the car very unpredictable. But a damper tube that isn't filled properly or tends to cavitate isn't great either.