R/C Tech Forums - View Single Post - Team CRC Xti 1/12th Scale!!
View Single Post
Old 02-15-2014, 12:21 PM
  #1316  
davidl
Tech Master
iTrader: (40)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,917
Trader Rating: 40 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Slapmaster6000
The taller ball stud is in place to assist the middle of the car from collapsing, gives the shock more travel and just a little more leverage.

Thanks for your reply, Brian. But I get back to one of my original questions. Focusing on the result and not the solution, wouldn't to car have done just as well using .45 front springs and left the shock mount in stock configuration? I look at that elevated ball and think that it would be overloading the front under certain conditions. That is why the .050 front spring. The lower shock angle would be less sensitive to small change and allow more opportunities for fine level tuning. I don't really know without trying it and want your thoughts when presented that choice.
davidl is offline