G-Force Motor Checker
#31
Are there any visible differences between the new and old one? Just wondering how to identify the new version when buying (I'm in the UK; import duty will make buying from the US impractical unfortunately).
#32
Tech Adept
#33
So this will do exactly what the motorlyzer will do at a fraction of the cost?
#35
Team EAM
iTrader: (79)
No there is no way to save any information to a laptop. They said this would drive the cost up to high.
EA
#39
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
I just picked up one of these units. It's the one the reads to 50*. I have decided that I will make readings at 40 and 45 as well as 50, and if I have to, I can estimate 55 and 60. Sure it would be nice to actually see it, but I will manage.
Everything I race is 1s, so the voltage tested at is double. It won't run on 4.2v. Again, I will manage. EA: do you think the KV and Amps are linear to the voltage input? Or do KV and amps follow a different curve in relation to voltage? Its all relative, just curious.
The most useful thing I am seeing so far is being able to set all the motors at 50* and see there KV ratings. Fool around with rotor shimming and its effects.
So timing of each hall sensor to the rotor is a new feature? That could be useful as pointed out. I guess you could see the consistency of the sensor board. If you had all 3 sensors firing off at different places, guess it wouldn't be as awesome.
The DB level feature, I first thought: sales pitch. But you know what, it did help me find a bearing that was little stuffed in wrong. I pulled the bearing, cleaned up the seat, installed a new bearing and guess what? The numbers did improve slightly.
I think that I will enjoy the fact I can actually see the timing and not just a random hash mark or some numbers that do not correspond to anything other then a reference.
As some would say: the Bodine-o-meter just got pegged. Time to write some new formulas.
This will be a good tool. Now if I could just couple it with a load.....
Brian
Everything I race is 1s, so the voltage tested at is double. It won't run on 4.2v. Again, I will manage. EA: do you think the KV and Amps are linear to the voltage input? Or do KV and amps follow a different curve in relation to voltage? Its all relative, just curious.
The most useful thing I am seeing so far is being able to set all the motors at 50* and see there KV ratings. Fool around with rotor shimming and its effects.
So timing of each hall sensor to the rotor is a new feature? That could be useful as pointed out. I guess you could see the consistency of the sensor board. If you had all 3 sensors firing off at different places, guess it wouldn't be as awesome.
The DB level feature, I first thought: sales pitch. But you know what, it did help me find a bearing that was little stuffed in wrong. I pulled the bearing, cleaned up the seat, installed a new bearing and guess what? The numbers did improve slightly.
I think that I will enjoy the fact I can actually see the timing and not just a random hash mark or some numbers that do not correspond to anything other then a reference.
As some would say: the Bodine-o-meter just got pegged. Time to write some new formulas.
This will be a good tool. Now if I could just couple it with a load.....
Brian
#44
Tech Master
iTrader: (11)
How are you testing peak rpm and kv timewise? I'm pressing the button in s steady rate until I hit full throttle, is that how you're doing? EA responded in his thread about getting a steady reading then he stops it. Just trying to get feedback from other users. Im sure you know you can let it run unloaded and the reading will keep going.
#45
Well, I crank the knob to full and then let it run full for 3-4 seconds. The motor checker gradually increase the motors speed even when you crank the knob. I think either technique will suffice, as long as you let the motor "settle in". Then take your readings from that.