4LikesNEW HOBBYWING STOCK SUPERCHARGED SOFTWARE
03-18-2011, 02:39 AM
#4081
And without full logging software, you wouldn't be able to tell it either...
You might note that my .xls says nothing about turbo, why? because Turbo is related to something that is a load more difficult to quantify, which is the drivers throttle thumb...
You've missed the point of the sheet as well. It's a means to provide an idea of what the software is doing at a given point, not to provide 100% accurate values (there are way to many on track variables for that). Look at the sheet again, it says BOOST END RPM... nothing about max RPM
To say it's failed is a bit bloody rich!
You might note that my .xls says nothing about turbo, why? because Turbo is related to something that is a load more difficult to quantify, which is the drivers throttle thumb...
You've missed the point of the sheet as well. It's a means to provide an idea of what the software is doing at a given point, not to provide 100% accurate values (there are way to many on track variables for that). Look at the sheet again, it says BOOST END RPM... nothing about max RPM
To say it's failed is a bit bloody rich!
yes, it's best to use the RPM Log,
and so max RPM data also will do, to get best setting's Under Load.
03-18-2011, 04:07 AM
#4083
224 v's 119 v's 221 v's 213
enough of the rpm log please, talk about it when its out! I have a GM and I never make use of the max rpm log. Time/boost/turbo per lap times. Couldnt care about the rpm tbh.
lets talk about the current s/w.
224 v's 119 v's 221 v's 213
whats everyone preferring and why?
what settings are better, more boost or more turbo, delays, turbo rates,what tracks?
I'm finding 40/20, 0 delay to work the best in 119, medium sized, med-high traction track.
have not tried 1224 or 213 yet, tried 221 but it keep blowing my capacitors
lets talk about the current s/w.
224 v's 119 v's 221 v's 213
whats everyone preferring and why?
what settings are better, more boost or more turbo, delays, turbo rates,what tracks?
I'm finding 40/20, 0 delay to work the best in 119, medium sized, med-high traction track.
have not tried 1224 or 213 yet, tried 221 but it keep blowing my capacitors
03-18-2011, 04:16 AM
#4084
I downloaded the fw from the Hobbywing site last night and it's the same I I got a week ago. Still only has 119 and 221 on of the ones you mentioned above. Am happy with 221 though as plenty quick enough but more importantly the motor is cooler.
03-18-2011, 04:17 AM
#4085
03-18-2011, 04:50 AM
#4086
Tech Apprentice
There is not 221 what you all said ? 
03-18-2011, 05:18 AM
#4087
there is 2 hint
Angelo said
the V3.0_110213 turbo had rpm dependable (not released yet).
and Michael is implementing rpm log for esc firmware (under development)
i hope we all happy when it's all out Soon.
Angelo said
the V3.0_110213 turbo had rpm dependable (not released yet).
and Michael is implementing rpm log for esc firmware (under development)
i hope we all happy when it's all out Soon.
03-18-2011, 05:53 AM
#4088
software help
Hoping someone can guide me a little here. I am trying to update the software (as soon as I open the Hobbywing application I get a message to download new software) but as soon as I click to download it immedeately says "update failed". Any ideas or where I can go to download it manually?
03-18-2011, 06:10 AM
#4089
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: i dunno im just fixing my rc car wait was i even talking to you!
Posts: 166
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Make sure you run it as Administrator ( right Mouse / Run As Administrator ) then update should work ok
03-18-2011, 06:13 AM
#4090
03-18-2011, 06:24 AM
#4091
03-18-2011, 06:41 AM
#4092
03-18-2011, 06:52 AM
#4093
03-18-2011, 07:07 AM
#4094
211
Done, had to re-install it but all col thanks for your help. Whats the comparison between this and the 119? Smoother, faster, tourquier?
03-18-2011, 07:08 AM
#4095
I downloaded direct from Hobbywing last night and 211 was on it for sure.