Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

JP engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2008, 01:39 PM
  #796  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
 
ezveedub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 2,426
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Scott Fisher
Looks like it is based off of the 367 buggy engine. The reason I say that is Novarossi 15011 crankshaft is out of the 367 engine.
Nope! Its not from that engine. I have a 367, it doesn't look anywhere near the same as that crank, trust me. The part number swap with Novarossi is not the same with the JP.
ezveedub is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 05:28 PM
  #797  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 4,166
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ezveedub
Nope! Its not from that engine. I have a 367, it doesn't look anywhere near the same as that crank, trust me. The part number swap with Novarossi is not the same with the JP.
I believe you, except the part about the part number swap. I also own/have owned JP engines and all the part numbers swap over identically. I guess it isn't in this case.
Scott Fisher is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 07:38 PM
  #798  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
 
ezveedub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 2,426
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Scott Fisher
I believe you, except the part about the part number swap. I also own/have owned JP engines and all the part numbers swap over identically. I guess it isn't in this case.
Same here, I have nova and jp engines and they usually cross over the numbers, but on the top end series, there is some misleading part number swapping that don't make sense. I'm hearing that the JP R7/R9 engines have 35 plus 21 cranks. Not sure, but what the hell, I don't have one so I wouldn't know.
ezveedub is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 07:58 PM
  #799  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 4,166
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Try sending an email to JP. Tell them some story why you can't get a JP crank, but nova stuff is plentiful. I don't really know, but make up something good. I have found they usually answer emails the same day they get it.
Scott Fisher is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 09:04 PM
  #800  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
Arahawak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A.D. 2030
Posts: 3,447
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Hi,

Anybody knows any webstores that sells JP engines?
Arahawak is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 07:40 PM
  #801  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Default

I Purchased my JP's from Brooklyn Hobbies...
Great service and the best prices
CrazyJoe is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 08:31 PM
  #802  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
Arahawak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A.D. 2030
Posts: 3,447
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CrazyJoe
I Purchased my JP's from Brooklyn Hobbies...
Great service and the best prices
They dun have alot of .12 engines

Thanks anyways, i got mine from Kamikaze, great guys there.
Arahawak is offline  
Old 07-18-2008, 09:14 PM
  #803  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Default

What is the best Pipe for the 21 Eagle 9 port as well the new Eagle 12?
CrazyJoe is offline  
Old 07-20-2008, 03:30 PM
  #804  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 530
Trader Rating: 4 (83%+)
Default

Originally Posted by CrazyJoe
What is the best Pipe for the 21 Eagle 9 port as well the new Eagle 12?
for the ..12 the JP 2620 and conical header and for the .21 the 2015 and medium header, thats based on my testing...
Roniel_R is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 07:00 AM
  #805  
Tech Regular
 
Bad Mika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 311
Default runtime

Originally Posted by Roniel_R
for the ..12 the JP 2620 and conical header and for the .21 the 2015 and medium header, thats based on my testing...
hi, can you get 5 mins+ runtime on a medium to high speed, medium/large track for th 12 and JP 2620 and conical header combination ?

thanks ...
Bad Mika is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 10:35 AM
  #806  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 530
Trader Rating: 4 (83%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bad Mika
hi, can you get 5 mins+ runtime on a medium to high speed, medium/large track for th 12 and JP 2620 and conical header combination ?

thanks ...
for runtime issues you should not have any problems with the 2620...
Roniel_R is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 01:27 PM
  #807  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
DS Motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,448
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Roniel_R
for the ..12 the JP 2620 and conical header and for the .21 the 2015 and medium header, thats based on my testing...
i believe 2602 from mega or max(same pipe) works the best.
The 2620 makes the engine perform a bit flat, it performes ok in all ranges but no real grunt.
The 2602 wil give the engine more mid and topspeed.
then you have the 2601 which works good aswell, but it's totally focused on top speed.
I always use a short conical header(5 fins).
And don't try the 2630, its completly shit. If you want any decent performance out of it your engine will overheat.
DS Motorsport is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 06:38 PM
  #808  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 530
Trader Rating: 4 (83%+)
Default

the 2602 and 2620 pipe is the same pipe the only difference is the header both kits come with... if you feel it performs different its maybe you got a bad pipe because i have tried them both and i cant tell a difference..
Roniel_R is offline  
Old 07-21-2008, 09:56 PM
  #809  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (32)
 
Arahawak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A.D. 2030
Posts: 3,447
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DS Motorsport
i believe 2602 from mega or max(same pipe) works the best.
The 2620 makes the engine perform a bit flat, it performes ok in all ranges but no real grunt.
The 2602 wil give the engine more mid and topspeed.
then you have the 2601 which works good aswell, but it's totally focused on top speed.
I always use a short conical header(5 fins).
And don't try the 2630, its completly shit. If you want any decent performance out of it your engine will overheat.
If you say 2630 is completely shit, then I am in trouble. Apparently, I am unable to lay my hands on a 2602 or a 2601 pipe!!

Everybody's out of stock or it is out of production or everybody grab it for the Worlds'???
Arahawak is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 05:17 PM
  #810  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
DS Motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,448
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Roniel_R
the 2602 and 2620 pipe is the same pipe the only difference is the header both kits come with... if you feel it performs different its maybe you got a bad pipe because i have tried them both and i cant tell a difference..
The header in the mega version is the thing that makes the difference because it has a different innner diameter, larger than normal pipes.
This is why it rev's better.

btw the rb 2604, is the same as the 2602 max, maybe you could get your hands on that one.

@ arawark, yes i know, really hard to come by, maybe try if you can order the pipe at a european site, but even i cant get any mega 2602 pipes any more and i live 10 minutes from the serpent factory.
DS Motorsport is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.