Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree13Likes

Murnan Modified Motors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2011, 04:55 PM
  #2761  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Grinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,864
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ralphierace13
does the 8 plug make alittle less power?

uriah how was miami?!!!
The 8 plug makes the engine smoother with more top end than a 7. The 7 plug will have a little more pop on bottom. I tried the 7 plug, and the 8 is way more durable on Homesteads long straight.

I learned a lot in Miami. It was my first time there, and probably the last before the WC in April. I had lots of problems with bodies. The light weight bodies can not stand up to the down force placed on them, even with lots of stiffeners. I will not run the light weight body there for sure. I even melted the lite weight body behind the engine due to the heat. The engine was only running about 250F max.

The engines ran great though, especially after switching to the Shephard clutch spring. It is the best spring on the market for sure, IMO. It made my engine feel way more powerful than any spring I have tried.

We tested some different modified engines, the 35+21, Flash Special, and RBC10. All made similar laptimes, and none were great on fuel mileage. I could have made mileage, but it would have been damaging to the engines. I did not want to use one engine per qualifier. All of the engines I used are still in great shape, and ready to race again.

It looked like some of the top drivers that made runtime were using a new engine every qualifier. Must be nice. Hehe.

The track is a blast to drive though. There is nothing like going into that sweeper full wood at close to 70mph without lifting off the throttle!!
Grinder is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 04:56 PM
  #2762  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Grinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,864
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by wingracer
It should make a bit more top end but a bit less low end.
Grinder is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 04:57 PM
  #2763  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Grinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,864
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ralphierace13
since were on the subject of plugs what will a long body nova do compared to a short body plug?
The long body retains a little more heat. It seems to be slightly hotter, idles slightly longer than a short body plug.
Grinder is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 05:04 PM
  #2764  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (91)
 
GMartinez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 8,445
Trader Rating: 91 (100%+)
Default

Uriah Thanks again for changing that beering for me much appreciated see ya soon
GMartinez is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 05:34 PM
  #2765  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
ralphierace13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,565
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Grinder
The 8 plug makes the engine smoother with more top end than a 7. The 7 plug will have a little more pop on bottom. I tried the 7 plug, and the 8 is way more durable on Homesteads long straight.

I learned a lot in Miami. It was my first time there, and probably the last before the WC in April. I had lots of problems with bodies. The light weight bodies can not stand up to the down force placed on them, even with lots of stiffeners. I will not run the light weight body there for sure. I even melted the lite weight body behind the engine due to the heat. The engine was only running about 250F max.

The engines ran great though, especially after switching to the Shephard clutch spring. It is the best spring on the market for sure, IMO. It made my engine feel way more powerful than any spring I have tried.

We tested some different modified engines, the 35+21, Flash Special, and RBC10. All made similar laptimes, and none were great on fuel mileage. I could have made mileage, but it would have been damaging to the engines. I did not want to use one engine per qualifier. All of the engines I used are still in great shape, and ready to race again.

It looked like some of the top drivers that made runtime were using a new engine every qualifier. Must be nice. Hehe.

The track is a blast to drive though. There is nothing like going into that sweeper full wood at close to 70mph without lifting off the throttle!!
hey who told u bout the sheaperd spring!!!! lol
ralphierace13 is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 05:52 PM
  #2766  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (24)
 
wingracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,737
Trader Rating: 24 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ralphierace13
hey who told u bout the sheaperd spring!!!! lol
I thought everyone knew about that. I run a Shepherd yet a Mugen guy told me about it
wingracer is offline  
Old 01-10-2011, 09:13 PM
  #2767  
occ
Tech Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 576
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Grinder
I had lots of problems with bodies. The light weight bodies can not stand up to the down force placed on them, even with lots of stiffeners. I will not run the light weight body there for sure. I even melted the lite weight body behind the engine due to the heat. The engine was only running about 250F max.
Interesting info about the lightweight bodies. Which body did most guys use?
occ is offline  
Old 01-11-2011, 04:48 AM
  #2768  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
ralphierace13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,565
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

when the team went to the pre worlds we had all ready heard the light weights were no good we ran the new p909with the fin in the middle .30 and the new protform i think r-15 .30 weight they worked great
ralphierace13 is offline  
Old 01-11-2011, 04:24 PM
  #2769  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 559
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ralphierace13
when the team went to the pre worlds we had all ready heard the light weights were no good we ran the new p909with the fin in the middle .30 and the new protform i think r-15 .30 weight they worked great
There are 3 Choices when it comes to thickness.

Reg
Light
Superlight

Not to be off topic on motors but what ones are you all referring to.
Vector03cobra is offline  
Old 01-11-2011, 04:44 PM
  #2770  
occ
Tech Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 576
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Vector03cobra
There are 3 Choices when it comes to thickness.

Reg
Light
Superlight

Not to be off topic on motors but what ones are you all referring to.
Ralphie is referring to the light ones. They are .30.

Reg: .40
Light: .30
Superlight: .25
occ is offline  
Old 01-17-2011, 10:14 AM
  #2771  
Tech Fanatic
 
kitracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: hong kong
Posts: 986
Default Novarossi Cup China

At the Novarossi Cup in China on the weekend, the M3 driven by Samuel got the TQ and 1st

what is so amazing , this is the 5th Race without changing anything. same bearing same conrod with at least 5 gallon of 25% nitro fuel. I only need to do vision inspection after each race.

Samuel have won 3 race with the same engine, 2nd on another race. I raced once at the FEMCA. I think we going to test how far it will go.

Samuel prepared a new M3 in case anything happened but was no need. The engine idle perfect and stable all weekend so he decided to keep the same engine for both Sat and Sunday.

MaTa Wang Q2 and finished 2nd also uses M3. Both of them are the only driver go below 14 sec per lap on touring during Qualify.

JJ Wang also did well in 1/8 using Murnan (not sure was 35 or Kangaroo) Q3 but had a fail pulley right at the start and started 2:40 sec after everybody. Made the fastest lap in the final and came 5th overall.
kitracer is offline  
Old 01-22-2011, 08:03 PM
  #2772  
Tech Addict
 
keavze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 590
Default MM kangaroo vs std 35+21

hi uriah,
how does the mm kangaroo compared to the std 35+21 or even the 35+21LCWC09?
keavze is offline  
Old 01-24-2011, 04:08 PM
  #2773  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Grinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,864
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by keavze
hi uriah,
how does the mm kangaroo compared to the std 35+21 or even the 35+21LCWC09?
The MM Kangaroo is comparable in power to the stock 35+21. The 35+21 has about the same peak power as the mod Kangaroo. Some of my drivers prefer the MM Kangaroo over the 35+21 due to the smaller tracks they race on. The mod Kangaroo launches very hard out of the corners, and gets better mileage than the 35+21.

The stock 35+21, and mod Kangaroo are getting similar lap times. The Kangaroo launches harder, and the 35+21 revs slightly higher. My favorite is the MM35+21
Grinder is offline  
Old 01-24-2011, 04:42 PM
  #2774  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (40)
 
Grenade10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 4,737
Trader Rating: 40 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Grinder
My favorite is the MM35+21
+1, well actually +3 in my box!!!!

Some times just have to watch how I run, so fuel is still there at the end of the run.
Grenade10 is offline  
Old 01-25-2011, 01:47 PM
  #2775  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 346
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Thumbs up T10rc

Hi Uriah,

I have a T10rc MM engine i purchased just run in from a local racer in Sydney. All i can say is what an engine it has converted me to sticking with the MM product from now on. Awesome job very neat and performs excellent with heaps of power and made run time with ease.

I will be ordering another very soon.

Thinking of trying the Nova Flash what are your thoughts on the differences between the 2.

Cheers,
Mike 78 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.