Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro On-Road
Serpent 748 200mm nitro onroad kit >

Serpent 748 200mm nitro onroad kit

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree18Likes

Serpent 748 200mm nitro onroad kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2014, 12:48 AM
  #166  
Tech Addict
 
Aza088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by Fliggo
weight on that piece of engineering?
Not yet. i didn't build this car with light weight screws i want to see how much lighter it is in it's standard form. Will post findings soon.
Aza088 is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 12:52 AM
  #167  
Tech Addict
 
Aza088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by TeamCarnage
Nice! Worried about contaminated fuel?...
I'm guessing your commenting on the pressure line to the tank??

I have never ran a filter there and never had an issue.
There are all these theories behind filtering the gas entering the tank and most of all the theory of cooling the gas as it enters the tank. After long long long testing i have not been able to come to a conclusion on differences.
Basically -
Never had full go off or contaminate
Cooling the gas entering the tank we have never seen an advantage.
Les fuel tube or filters/coolers = less weight.
Aza088 is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 12:55 AM
  #168  
Tech Addict
 
Aza088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by JOE SI
Looked at the manual and only change I dont really like is the way the rear of the front upper arm mount. From what it looks like, it mounts right to the upperdeck and can easily break in a hard crash. Still loving the car though. Especially the rear flex system.
I don't think the problem with the top arm mount is the crash and break.
I think they have made it harder to remove the top deck. once those screws are removed the little threaded things fall out and are hard to get back in. during a race meet if you loose one your out!!
I look at it for hours. There is no other way to mount the top arm and save weight in that area.
There are many positives to the new design and how they have presented the kit.
lets see how it preforms on track.
Aza088 is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 05:33 AM
  #169  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
lil-bump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Cold Great Lakes
Posts: 3,036
Trader Rating: 89 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JOE SI
Ok, every time I use blank rims to set ride height, the rear ends up 3mm higher.
I just use the qualifier size which in my case is 58/60 and set it with those and very rarely touch it. What do you set the rear at if the front is set to 1mm on blank rims
With blank rims I set my ride height to .55mm front and 1mm rear. If traction is high I start a little lower maybe .25 and .65 I use automotive feeler gauges for the measurement.


Pass you soon...
lil-bump is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 05:46 AM
  #170  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
lil-bump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Cold Great Lakes
Posts: 3,036
Trader Rating: 89 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Aza088
Not yet. i didn't build this car with light weight screws i want to see how much lighter it is in it's standard form. Will post findings soon.
In the neighborhood of 1674 grams. This is with I believe low profile servos ,bias chassis weight and a Li-fe battery.

Pass you soon...
lil-bump is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 08:21 AM
  #171  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MANILA,PHILIPPINES
Posts: 536
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Aza088
I don't think the problem with the top arm mount is the crash and break.
I think they have made it harder to remove the top deck. once those screws are removed the little threaded things fall out and are hard to get back in. during a race meet if you loose one your out!!
I look at it for hours. There is no other way to mount the top arm and save weight in that area.
There are many positives to the new design and how they have presented the kit.
lets see how it preforms on track.
For those little threaded things, just put thread lock. Without it, I lost so many 6mm screws on the top deck of the 747 before
GPXJOE is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 10:08 AM
  #172  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
snuvet75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,589
Trader Rating: 16 (94%+)
Default

W/ SS shocks, has anybody had any trouble loosening up the adjusting nut when you try to adjust the ride height? When I turn the ride height adjusting nut, whole shock body turns ending up loosening the shock cap. I've been grabbing the shock body with long nose plier when I adjust the height to prevent it but was wondering if there's any solution. My S411 also has SS shocks but it doesn't have that sort of problem. I believe over time, adjusting nut may loosen up but so far not. I applied some bearing oil on the rubber ring inside the nut but didn't help. Obviously I use much thicker shock springs in 747/748 than those in S411. That plays a factor too.

EDIT: I was referring to the adjusting nut, not the upper shock cap(in the first sentence).

Last edited by snuvet75; 08-08-2014 at 05:01 PM.
snuvet75 is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 11:57 AM
  #173  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
lil-bump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Cold Great Lakes
Posts: 3,036
Trader Rating: 89 (100%+)
Default

Take the ring off of the shock body and clean it. You may have some debris stuck in the threads of the shock body and or ring. Maybe the O-ring in the adjustment collar has swollen from the oil. If the threads are damaged on the shock then you have to replace the shock body.


Pass you soon...
lil-bump is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 01:55 PM
  #174  
Tech Master
iTrader: (16)
 
snuvet75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,589
Trader Rating: 16 (94%+)
Default

Originally Posted by lil-bump
Take the ring off of the shock body and clean it. You may have some debris stuck in the threads of the shock body and or ring. Maybe the O-ring in the adjustment collar has swollen from the oil. If the threads are damaged on the shock then you have to replace the shock body.


Pass you soon...
They are new shocks. No debris. No swelling. Maybe they are just too tight since they are new ones.
snuvet75 is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 01:57 PM
  #175  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
lil-bump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Cold Great Lakes
Posts: 3,036
Trader Rating: 89 (100%+)
Default

Cross threaded???? Start swapping parts between the shocks
lil-bump is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 04:48 PM
  #176  
Tech Master
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,140
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by snuvet75
They are new shocks. No debris. No swelling. Maybe they are just too tight since they are new ones.
I always put oil on that.
Usually when I rebuild my shocks, I'll bleed the shock and when it gets on the threads I screw it all the way up so oil gets on the adjusting nut for the reason you're speaking of. Then I make a mark, so I know what a full turn is, loosen it 5 full turns and clean whatever oil is left over. It hasn't failed me yet
JOE SI is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 05:03 PM
  #177  
Tech Addict
 
Aza088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by snuvet75
They are new shocks. No debris. No swelling. Maybe they are just too tight since they are new ones.
Mine did as well new out of the kit. The O rings a a little tight. If you have the ride height adjust nut all the way to the top it tends to grab when new. They will loosen up. Also really tighten top cap. Another tip is to have the spring loose when adjusting the spring tension nut. sometimes the weight of the car on the spring can cause the o ring to grab.
Aza088 is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 06:08 PM
  #178  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
lil-bump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Cold Great Lakes
Posts: 3,036
Trader Rating: 89 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Aza088
I'm guessing your commenting on the pressure line to the tank??

I have never ran a filter there and never had an issue.
There are all these theories behind filtering the gas entering the tank and most of all the theory of cooling the gas as it enters the tank. After long long long testing i have not been able to come to a conclusion on differences.
Basically -
Never had full go off or contaminate
Cooling the gas entering the tank we have never seen an advantage.
Les fuel tube or filters/coolers = less weight.

I think Team C was talking about your numerous fuel filters on your 748...
lil-bump is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 11:13 PM
  #179  
Tech Addict
 
Aza088's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by lil-bump
I think Team C was talking about your numerous fuel filters on your 748...
Ah ha. In that case. There is no filter installed. Just 2 empty chambers. This is to bring the serpent tank up to 75cc. This was actually lighter than curling up fuel line.
Aza088 is offline  
Old 08-09-2014, 05:51 AM
  #180  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
lil-bump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Cold Great Lakes
Posts: 3,036
Trader Rating: 89 (100%+)
Default

Low profile servos only for this kit?
lil-bump is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.