The same cars coming off the assembly line aren't going to have identical performance. Just like hp ratings on engines vary on the same model cars in real size cars. Just because the specs say 160hp on a Toyota Corolla doesn't mean that's exactly what you're gonna get if you dyno it. Some cars off of the same assembly line will have higher hp than 150hp some will be lower some will be spot on. CAN YOU GRASP THIS SIMPLE CONCEPT???
since you like to gloss over the relevent points with your repeating of the same nonsensical doubting BS.
Two tests done by two different parties at different times and locations
A. Different road conditions
B. Different ambient temps
C. Different altitudes
D. Different cars of the same model - engines will have small variations in power output
F. Nitro fuel concentrations was unknown on CEN test
G. One test was done with the body the other test was done without - weight and aero becomes a factor
E. Different radar guns with different margins of errors.
You simply cannot CHERRY PICK RC Car's number to conclude that their results are more realistic than CEN's result. That's just plain stupid. You need to consider BOTH results and maybe take the average between the two.
These runs won't be identical....duh...they were done under different conditions. Get that through your bonehead.
It's pretty damn obvious that the CT4 is capable of going much faster than 50 mph even if you want to take RC Car mag's test as the END ALL BE ALL.
You trying to tell me you can tell the difference between 67 mph and 73 mph from watching a bad quality YT video??
I mean if that's the case then how come you didn't say 67, 68, 69, 70 mph but instead chose a lowball of 50 mph???
When you made that SELF-OWNAGE statement you lost all credibility dude.
In other words if you were so sure that a CT4 can't go above 67 mph how come you didn't say 66 or 65 or 64 mph and instead said 50 mph??
That's right you had ZERO CLUE how fast the car was going so you CANNOT say it was going only 67 mph in CEN's video...LMFAO!!!
How do you know it wasn't going 69, 70, 71 mph in that video????
The way I see it you're just pulling numbers out of our @ss because YOU DON'T KNOW HOW FAST the car was going. You don't even know if it was going slower or faster than 67 mph!!!
Do you even know what a small RC car going 50 mph vs 67 mph looks like? Apparently you don't.
And please stop repeating the same nonsensical BS, the burden of proof is yours not mine.
Let me ask you a question....now that you admit you were WAY OFF when you ass-umed it was going 50 mph.
How fast DO YOU THINK the car was going in CEN's video if not 73 mph???
Answer that question then maybe you have a chance of regaining some credibility.