Serpent 710
Originally posted by InitialD
One of the reasons why you would want to use the extender is to avoid wearing the pins out on the receiver. If those pin connectors spoil on the receiver, it'll be difficult and expensive to repair.
Also, the extender makes it easier for you to make the connection from the receiver pack to the receiver. If you were to make direct connections, you would probably need to take off the receiver cover every now and then to connect / disconnect.
One of the reasons why you would want to use the extender is to avoid wearing the pins out on the receiver. If those pin connectors spoil on the receiver, it'll be difficult and expensive to repair.
Also, the extender makes it easier for you to make the connection from the receiver pack to the receiver. If you were to make direct connections, you would probably need to take off the receiver cover every now and then to connect / disconnect.
Originally posted by InitialD
Usually 40 all around. For heats, maybe 37 or even 35. On rougher surfaces, 42 shore.
Usually 40 all around. For heats, maybe 37 or even 35. On rougher surfaces, 42 shore.
Right now I run 40 all around, but I wanted to try out 37 fronts and 40 rears.
Originally posted by InitialD
Does anybody think that this resembles the new Serpent / Ellegi tires that is pictured on the 710 kit box? The picture below are the new Twister tire rims.
Does anybody think that this resembles the new Serpent / Ellegi tires that is pictured on the 710 kit box? The picture below are the new Twister tire rims.
Originally posted by PSI Racing
Do you usually run the same shore all around?
Right now I run 40 all around, but I wanted to try out 37 fronts and 40 rears.
Do you usually run the same shore all around?
Right now I run 40 all around, but I wanted to try out 37 fronts and 40 rears.
With a oneway, I found that with 37 shore front and 40 shore rear hooks the car too much on my local track. 40 shore front and 42 shore rear was better. For most of the time, I could run same front and rear shores.
With a front diff, the shores used were mostly dependant on the diff settings. But I try to set using softer front than rear if not equal front and rear shores.
D, what's your take on the diff V one-way. You and I being mere mortals and not demi-gods like Julius maybe for us the diif is a better way to go? What was your experience in terms of driveability and consistancy?
Originally posted by markp27
D, what's your take on the diff V one-way. You and I being mere mortals and not demi-gods like Julius maybe for us the diif is a better way to go? What was your experience in terms of driveability and consistancy?
D, what's your take on the diff V one-way. You and I being mere mortals and not demi-gods like Julius maybe for us the diif is a better way to go? What was your experience in terms of driveability and consistancy?
The reason why sometimes I opt for solid front or front diff in races is that most racers here use front diffs and their racing lines are very different from using a oneway front.
Anyway, I miss my RING. It's nice to be demi-god once in a while.
Originally posted by InitialD
I agree with Julius that diffs would make driving more consistant. It is true like what Julius has mentioned. You need a lot of traction to make oneway work nice. Front diffs are nice when there's not much traction.
The reason why sometimes I opt for solid front or front diff in races is that most racers here use front diffs and their racing lines are very different from using a oneway front.
Anyway, I miss my RING. It's nice to be demi-god once in a while.
I agree with Julius that diffs would make driving more consistant. It is true like what Julius has mentioned. You need a lot of traction to make oneway work nice. Front diffs are nice when there's not much traction.
The reason why sometimes I opt for solid front or front diff in races is that most racers here use front diffs and their racing lines are very different from using a oneway front.
Anyway, I miss my RING. It's nice to be demi-god once in a while.
I was interested by Julius' comment about the braking with the diff - that he still brakes early, but then lets off sooner to avoid turn-in understeer (when I understood it correctly). Do you find that this aspect negates the advantage of a diff V one-way?
Hmm, I should really try the solid front end - I don't have a diff as yet.
When does your Ring get back?
Originally posted by markp27
I was interested by Julius' comment about the braking with the diff - that he still brakes early, but then lets off sooner to avoid turn-in understeer (when I understood it correctly). Do you find that this aspect negates the advantage of a diff V one-way?
I was interested by Julius' comment about the braking with the diff - that he still brakes early, but then lets off sooner to avoid turn-in understeer (when I understood it correctly). Do you find that this aspect negates the advantage of a diff V one-way?
In in all, front diff gives better braking to slowing down the car. With a oneway, if you did not have good traction, you would need to let off the throttle much earlier to slow down. Of course, you would want to have the car carry much speed in the middle of corners be it with a oneway front or with a front ball diff.
Originally posted by markp27
When does your Ring get back?
When does your Ring get back?
Originally posted by InitialD
In in all, front diff gives better braking to slowing down the car. With a oneway, if you did not have good traction, you would need to let off the throttle much earlier to slow down. Of course, you would want to have the car carry much speed in the middle of corners be it with a oneway front or with a front ball diff.
In in all, front diff gives better braking to slowing down the car. With a oneway, if you did not have good traction, you would need to let off the throttle much earlier to slow down. Of course, you would want to have the car carry much speed in the middle of corners be it with a oneway front or with a front ball diff.
I have also noticed how effective turn-in braking would be with the one way, as when I've braked a little too late and started to turn in whilst braking, the rear end swings nicely round - not yet completed the manouver successfully, though
Tech Fanatic
Originally posted by markp27
I have also noticed how effective turn-in braking would be with the one way, as when I've braked a little too late and started to turn in whilst braking, the rear end swings nicely round - not yet completed the manouver successfully, though
I have also noticed how effective turn-in braking would be with the one way, as when I've braked a little too late and started to turn in whilst braking, the rear end swings nicely round - not yet completed the manouver successfully, though
Commenting on sir Julius Setup on Saturday is confusing.
He definetely dying for steering in mid-corner but why using harder front spring. More consistent?
On Sunday is more conservative, could be because the traction is way better than Saturday.
Originally posted by GoldFinger
Dont do this oftenly Mark, this is what Sir Salven say : Car turns like a pendulum"
Commenting on sir Julius Setup on Saturday is confusing.
He definetely dying for steering in mid-corner but why using harder front spring. More consistent?
On Sunday is more conservative, could be because the traction is way better than Saturday.
Dont do this oftenly Mark, this is what Sir Salven say : Car turns like a pendulum"
Commenting on sir Julius Setup on Saturday is confusing.
He definetely dying for steering in mid-corner but why using harder front spring. More consistent?
On Sunday is more conservative, could be because the traction is way better than Saturday.
Originally posted by GoldFinger
Dont do this oftenly Mark, this is what Sir Salven say : Car turns like a pendulum"
Dont do this oftenly Mark, this is what Sir Salven say : Car turns like a pendulum"
Tech Fanatic
Originally posted by markp27
Perhaps to help under braking? Harder front springs should lead to more rear grip under braking as less weight is transfered to the font.
Perhaps to help under braking? Harder front springs should lead to more rear grip under braking as less weight is transfered to the font.
In LT arm with 8mm downstop, is almost no rear droop.
Tech Fanatic
Originally posted by markp27
Yep, just for the experts and not loosers like me
Yep, just for the experts and not loosers like me
Im 100% sure, no pro-drivers can do that in 45 min. consistently.
That is why they avoid that condition too.
You drive EVO III do you ?
Use Sir Karn setup and test it. You will see the car so stiff and roll very much. Pyramid ever ask him about that and his answer is with stiff car makes the cornering more "fluid" so making it consistent is easy.
Note: Easy for Him!
I guess Easy and FAST is more correct word.