Kyosho Gas powered 1/12th pan car
#256
pics please///
#257
A few hours into the build....
I did upgrade the disk rotor... still a Kyosho part... just not the stamped steel version included.
I did upgrade the disk rotor... still a Kyosho part... just not the stamped steel version included.
#259
nice...more pics
#260
Three things left to do:
Break in motor
Paint body
Smile when it kicks into second....
Break in motor
Paint body
Smile when it kicks into second....
#262
I added this brace. I used aluminum tubing as I didn't have any 2.5 or 3mm carbon fiber. I think that there is a weakness front to back with the chassis. Most nitro cars have a top plate that reinforces the fore to aft flex. It may be overkill.... but it was easy and I think it will help. By the way... breaking in the motor.... three tanks takes about 20 minutes.... I think that each tank took about five minutes or less... I will start to lean it tonight and will have it on the track tomorrow.
#263
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
That brace is a great idea. Im going to steal,i mean use that idea. Im not the greatest driver and have re shaped my main chassis a few times. but i if i use a brace like your it should be alot tougher. Have you thought about some sort of X shaped brace across the two beams you have installed now?
Again a very nice idea.
Again a very nice idea.
Last edited by bakaguyjean; 08-31-2007 at 07:21 AM.
#264
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Post a picture of you set up and maybe we can help.
#265
I am glad you like the idea. You can tell Kyosho to send the check to me....
I wasn't as concerned with side to side flex... at least for now. The X brace would stiffen the side to side flex... some side to side helps rear traction. I did think about bracing from the screws just in front of the fuel tank to the front in a V shape... but I would have to pass over the belt and... for now... I am staying on the sides.
I wasn't as concerned with side to side flex... at least for now. The X brace would stiffen the side to side flex... some side to side helps rear traction. I did think about bracing from the screws just in front of the fuel tank to the front in a V shape... but I would have to pass over the belt and... for now... I am staying on the sides.
#266
I am glad you like the idea. You can tell Kyosho to send the check to me....
I wasn't as concerned with side to side flex... at least for now. The X brace would stiffen the side to side flex... some side to side helps rear traction. I did think about bracing from the screws just in front of the fuel tank to the front in a V shape... but I would have to pass over the belt and... for now... I am staying on the sides.
I wasn't as concerned with side to side flex... at least for now. The X brace would stiffen the side to side flex... some side to side helps rear traction. I did think about bracing from the screws just in front of the fuel tank to the front in a V shape... but I would have to pass over the belt and... for now... I am staying on the sides.
#267
The bottom chassis plate seems a tad soft. Any front impact will bend it up as there is nothing to stop it. This is not a carbon fiber chassis that will return to it's original shape during flex and I have read about people bending their chassis and seeking replacement or bending it back (??). I think... just me thinking again... that there is still a lot of side to side flex.... that is where the additional traction comes from. The front to rear flex will also mess with belt tension...
As I didn't finish engineering school.... or even start engineering school... these are just thoughts... your actual mileage may vary....
As I didn't finish engineering school.... or even start engineering school... these are just thoughts... your actual mileage may vary....
Last edited by Zootcapri; 08-31-2007 at 09:21 AM. Reason: spelling correction
#268
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
The bottom chassis plate seems a tad soft. Any front impact will bend it up as there is nothing to stop it. This is not a carbon fiber chassis that will return to it's original shape during flex and I have read about people bending their chassis and seeking replacement or bending it back (??). I think... just me thinking again... that there is still a lot of side to side flex.... that is where the additional traction comes from. The front to rear flex will also mess with belt tension...
As I didn't finish engineering school.... or even start engineering school... these are just thoughts... your actual mileage may vary....
As I didn't finish engineering school.... or even start engineering school... these are just thoughts... your actual mileage may vary....
BUt most of the guys i run with can drive and have not bent thier chassis`s yet.
#269
Yet...
This is not a manditory change... I think it will make my car better ... If you think this is a waste of time... that's cool too ... I just posted 'cause I thought it interesting.
This is not a manditory change... I think it will make my car better ... If you think this is a waste of time... that's cool too ... I just posted 'cause I thought it interesting.
#270
The bottom chassis plate seems a tad soft. Any front impact will bend it up as there is nothing to stop it. This is not a carbon fiber chassis that will return to it's original shape during flex and I have read about people bending their chassis and seeking replacement or bending it back (??). I think... just me thinking again... that there is still a lot of side to side flex.... that is where the additional traction comes from. The front to rear flex will also mess with belt tension...
As I didn't finish engineering school.... or even start engineering school... these are just thoughts... your actual mileage may vary....
As I didn't finish engineering school.... or even start engineering school... these are just thoughts... your actual mileage may vary....