Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
Review of the RB One R competition buggy >

Review of the RB One R competition buggy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

Review of the RB One R competition buggy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2014, 06:16 AM
  #376  
Tech Master
iTrader: (65)
 
DaveG28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,610
Trader Rating: 65 (100%+)
Default

Yes I spotted his additional piece at the recent race raising the outer link!

I will start with what I have, less droop and upper hole, but will almost certainly switch during the first race weekend to see the difference! Thanks!

Am I right in thinking you need to slightly unscrew the shock bottoms to get desired rear shock length?
DaveG28 is offline  
Old 07-09-2014, 06:18 AM
  #377  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

speedy2 is offline  
Old 07-09-2014, 06:47 AM
  #378  
Tech Master
iTrader: (65)
 
DaveG28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,610
Trader Rating: 65 (100%+)
Default

That is WAY more rear droop than I can get out of a. Standard shock length...must be unscrewing the shock bottoms surely!?
DaveG28 is offline  
Old 07-09-2014, 07:07 AM
  #379  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 692
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DaveG28
Yes I spotted his additional piece at the recent race raising the outer link!

I will start with what I have, less droop and upper hole, but will almost certainly switch during the first race weekend to see the difference! Thanks!

Am I right in thinking you need to slightly unscrew the shock bottoms to get desired rear shock length?
I thought about making a piece for the rear arms like that, but after changing to the lower hinge pin hole, I was happy with the results.
I'm not sure what you mean about unscrewing the shock bottoms. Mine has plenty of length.
fbrk8r is offline  
Old 07-09-2014, 07:12 AM
  #380  
Tech Master
iTrader: (65)
 
DaveG28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,610
Trader Rating: 65 (100%+)
Default

My shock length hole to hole (center) at the rear is about 121mm max... Which does not give much arm droop. I am not sure how people are getting 129mm shock length! I have another set to build tonight or tomorrow so will see if I get the same results...not sure what I could have done wrong though!

By unscrewing I mean having shock shaft thread still showing, and not fully screwing on the plastic ballcup to the bottom of he shock shaft to increase length!
DaveG28 is offline  
Old 07-09-2014, 07:30 AM
  #381  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 692
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Their measurement of 129 is from end to end. Hole to hole is about 10mm less.
fbrk8r is offline  
Old 07-09-2014, 07:53 AM
  #382  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 692
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Also, on that setup, you'll notice the upper rear shock mount is in a lower location which should give it more droop.
fbrk8r is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 12:23 AM
  #383  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Rockhampton.Qld Australia
Posts: 480
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Does the RTR V2 use the same chassis and drive shafts etc as the kit. I have a V1 that I want to upgrade to the V2 chassis.
Dave
Flip it is offline  
Old 07-13-2014, 03:32 AM
  #384  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 692
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

It uses a different Chassis plate. Whether or not the kit plate will interchange or not, I don't know. I flipped through some pictures, and it looks like the rtr doesn't use the flat chassis plate like the kit. It's possible that they interchange, but it may need the kit rear diff housing.
fbrk8r is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 01:40 AM
  #385  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
speedy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 4,043
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I think the rtr's use the V1 chassis and rear toe/squat plates

Last edited by speedy2; 07-15-2014 at 02:32 AM.
speedy2 is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 11:44 PM
  #386  
Tech Master
iTrader: (65)
 
DaveG28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,610
Trader Rating: 65 (100%+)
Default

Ok, had my first run this last weekend, both nitro and Ebuggy:

1. Both handled a little loose out of the box,but switching to the lower hole in the rear hub and then adding arm droop improved this a lot. I concentrated on learning the cars behavior rather than tuning.

2. Was pleasantly surprised at how similar the nitro and Ebuggy handle to each other. I expected the nitro to be looser but they take a very similar style.

3. I had an Ackerman link screw fall out..li think longer screws would be safer here. The odd other screw went Walkies too but I expect that to be honest!

4. Cars are tough, took quite some battering. Only damage was a bent driveshaft, I think because I lost a kingpin screw so it had been forced into some weird angles!


Only other thing is I got full tank lean bog in my final...is there an optimal gas line route on the car to minimize this? Does a longer line help?

Overall very impressed so far!
DaveG28 is offline  
Old 07-15-2014, 04:59 PM
  #387  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Panic09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 500
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

How is the driveline and brakes on this car?
Panic09 is offline  
Old 07-15-2014, 09:09 PM
  #388  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 692
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Panic09
How is the driveline and brakes on this car?
really good. the brake setup is very unique and works great. Driveline is very good too. The whole car is very durable. I have been running mine for a long time now and the only thing I have broken is a carbon shock tower, but that is to be expected. I have since upgraded to the aluminum ones.
fbrk8r is offline  
Old 07-15-2014, 09:14 PM
  #389  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 692
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DaveG28
Ok, had my first run this last weekend, both nitro and Ebuggy:

1. Both handled a little loose out of the box,but switching to the lower hole in the rear hub and then adding arm droop improved this a lot. I concentrated on learning the cars behavior rather than tuning.

2. Was pleasantly surprised at how similar the nitro and Ebuggy handle to each other. I expected the nitro to be looser but they take a very similar style.

3. I had an Ackerman link screw fall out..li think longer screws would be safer here. The odd other screw went Walkies too but I expect that to be honest!

4. Cars are tough, took quite some battering. Only damage was a bent driveshaft, I think because I lost a kingpin screw so it had been forced into some weird angles!


Only other thing is I got full tank lean bog in my final...is there an optimal gas line route on the car to minimize this? Does a longer line help?

Overall very impressed so far!
I have tried a few different routing methods and the tune didn't really change.
fbrk8r is offline  
Old 07-18-2014, 12:55 PM
  #390  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Rockhampton.Qld Australia
Posts: 480
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

What handling improvements has the V2 gained over the V1. First drive with the V1 last weekend was in a 30 min final. Great steering on and of power and the best brakes of any buggy I have driven but the rear end was inconsistently loose.
Flip it is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.