is this what i think it is
#1
is this what i think it is
is that a shock piston set-up for a rear chassis brace
http://gallery.neobuggy.net/2010-Rac...53131804_U8ckX
http://gallery.neobuggy.net/2010-Rac...53131804_U8ckX
#3
is this something truhe has been testing for awhile now or is this new
#4
Tech Elite
iTrader: (24)
http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...-Chassis-Brace
#6
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
Damped chassis have been around since the mid-90's but always abandoned after a while. Mugen Athletes (Evo?) had them, even at the front. The latest Yankees had them as a option, and it was a usual fixture on the SVM Crono's (Europas) and was an integral part of the car's suspension with an articulated chassis (as opposed to the Athlete, which was more about controlling flex)
Re the fioroni thingy, it serves a different purpose - it's more of a "flex limiter" than a damper (it isn't damped anyway). It allows the chassis to flex, but to a certain extent only (a few degrees). It can also be locked to be like a normal alloy rear brace just by screwing in an M3 screw. More than "just bling" if you ask me...
Paul
Re the fioroni thingy, it serves a different purpose - it's more of a "flex limiter" than a damper (it isn't damped anyway). It allows the chassis to flex, but to a certain extent only (a few degrees). It can also be locked to be like a normal alloy rear brace just by screwing in an M3 screw. More than "just bling" if you ask me...
Paul
#7
Tech Master
iTrader: (7)
Truhe used the other brace from Fioroni on his car at the Nats http://www.amainhobbies.com/advanced...words=ot-ur312 and said it was very good. The spring loaded brace is a tuning option and speaking specifically about the one for the Losi car, I have spoken to several drivers who have used it and said it improved the handling and ease of driving of the car, especially on rough tracks. They are not pointless by any means.
#8
Tech Lord
iTrader: (148)
Truhe used the other brace from Fioroni on his car at the Nats http://www.amainhobbies.com/advanced...words=ot-ur312 and said it was very good. The spring loaded brace is a tuning option and speaking specifically about the one for the Losi car, I have spoken to several drivers who have used it and said it improved the handling and ease of driving of the car, especially on rough tracks. They are not pointless by any means.
I have been running those braces for several months and let me tell you. If you want more flex the thin brace will give it to you. Tons more than a plastic brace. Espically on a truggy. I have also bent one of those thin fioroni braces in 1/2 in my e truggy it's just too much for it. But if flex is what you are after those fioroni braces deliver. I like them. Plus the bling factor is huge.
#10
And did anyone else read the race report where it stated that Truhe's handling seemed to go to pot and get worse as the race went on...
Maybe his rear flex-damper shock died/went flat/changed rebound...
#11
#12
to me if you run a tft flex chassis on a 1.0 t or a 2.0 t why whould you need it ? isnt too much flex a bad thing espially for the gear mesh/ clutchbell ?
#13
#14
#15
Tech Champion
iTrader: (82)
The rear brace if swapped for a thinner one
(this case in Frank L case)
Will allow the Rear to be more settled on ruff Cali tracks and seem easier to drive on and off power through said "ruff" tracks.