Mugen MBX6 vs Agama A8
#16
+10 I picked my MBX6 M-Spec up Thursday (coming from a losi). Got it out of the box and race ready with my equipment in it and checked it over, being pre-built I just had to check screws and such...
By Sunday it was Top 3 at The East Coast Race Against Cancer, Pro Buggy only behind Anthony Mazzara and Dan Ross after 30 minutes!!! Only change to the car was dialed out some front brake. Was on the outside looking in for a podium the past 2 years at the RAC with my losi (4th the past 2) and 3 days on my Mugen= losi what? Don't know anything about the Agama buggy other than it looks like a losi... So I vote Mugen.
By Sunday it was Top 3 at The East Coast Race Against Cancer, Pro Buggy only behind Anthony Mazzara and Dan Ross after 30 minutes!!! Only change to the car was dialed out some front brake. Was on the outside looking in for a podium the past 2 years at the RAC with my losi (4th the past 2) and 3 days on my Mugen= losi what? Don't know anything about the Agama buggy other than it looks like a losi... So I vote Mugen.
#17
Tech Adept
Haven`t run a Mugen,gone from Xray 808 to the Agama.
Agama is very nimble,corners like it`s on rails and fly`s like a bird.
Durability is as good as the Xray so far, and trust me, I test the durability very well.
Price and support for the Agama is very good.
Mugen are top notch as well,either will be a good choice.
Agama is very nimble,corners like it`s on rails and fly`s like a bird.
Durability is as good as the Xray so far, and trust me, I test the durability very well.
Price and support for the Agama is very good.
Mugen are top notch as well,either will be a good choice.
#18
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
Well I have broke the front arms on my mugen several times. However I can always account for why (user error). This past Sunday I broke upper and lower arms and I knew it was going to happen before it hit. I'm always pushing the limit of the car during practice. However during a race I have never broken anything. As far as the AGAMA being easier to drive than a mugen. If you need something easier than a Mugen its called a Chauffeur.
#19
Actually you are incorrect. Mugen parts are not all made in Japan.
#20
i am having a hard time understanding why there is problems with the arms. I have never broken one, i have seen some break. Did they have this problem on the 5? When putting a 6 together the composites seem top notch. Just curious what the problem is
#21
Tech Champion
iTrader: (53)
The best comparison I can think of it is, its has a Losi style efficient drivetrain (10x more durable than Losi) and similar to Mugen geometry
#23
I'm driving a Mugen and never broke an A-arm in a race. I broke 1 A-arm on a BMX track when I was flying 5m height and 20m far at full throttle. The car land on an other hill on the right front wheel. I was happy only the A-arm broke.
#24
The 6T Truggy breaks arms quite a bit..I have broken 3 lower arms this season on hits my 5T would take all season......I have not seen the Buggy break arms tho, just the truggy...
#25
Tech Adept
HEY VLAD
THE AGAMA IS WAY DIFFERENT THEN THE LOSI ,OR SHOULD I SAY "SLOPPY LOSI"
IT HANDLE's WAY BETTER , and set up changes give back a positve result. dont let the looks fool you, if you go to agama racing.com take a look under the hood and you'll find it to be quite different, sure they took some ideas from losi, the losi is a trend setting car but that does not make it the car to have .every time a car comes out that changes the industry like losi, other companies see what they are doing and improve on them , thats just what agama did. i have had this buggy for about a month and it's top quality. no matter if there are bugs to work out , every buggy got bugs. agama a8 has it's own identity by now ,try one
#28
I only race the truggy class but if I did race the buggy class I would also look at The Car from JQ. There is a thread in this forum about it
#30
so i guess what i would like to know is, what is the difference between the composite in the arms on the 5t vs 6t? Did they go with a different manufacturer or changed the design? changed the composite? If it worked so well on the five, why change it?