Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
Dynamite 086 vs. OFNA 086 >

Dynamite 086 vs. OFNA 086

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Dynamite 086 vs. OFNA 086

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2009, 07:15 PM
  #1  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Quad Racer 34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: OHIO
Posts: 2,973
Trader Rating: 4 (83%+)
Default Dynamite 086 vs. OFNA 086

will the Dynamite 086 pipe perform as well as the OFNA 086? will they be the same or perform different? im looking for a pipe that will tame the low end power down as much as possible and have real good top end. im putting it on a jammin jpx.21 and need as much runtime as possible.
any suggestions on other pipes or anything please let me know!
thanks
Quad Racer 34 is offline  
Old 12-07-2009, 07:20 PM
  #2  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (53)
 
thenova70ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,635
Trader Rating: 53 (100%+)
Default

They will perform the same i have run them both and they are the same pipe and perform the same.This is a GREAT pipe for the jpx.21 and it will do just wont you wont to do tame the low end and make Crazy top end power. I have on and run it on a Novarossi 3 port and it works GREAT smooths out the bottom and gives the little 3 port Ton of Top End.
thenova70ss is offline  
Old 12-07-2009, 07:26 PM
  #3  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Quad Racer 34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: OHIO
Posts: 2,973
Trader Rating: 4 (83%+)
Default

will it give me more runtime than my 053 low end pipe?
Quad Racer 34 is offline  
Old 12-07-2009, 07:43 PM
  #4  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Maximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Quad Racer 34
will it give me more runtime than my 053 low end pipe?


yes.... I certainly would think so...
Maximo is offline  
Old 12-07-2009, 07:44 PM
  #5  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (53)
 
thenova70ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,635
Trader Rating: 53 (100%+)
Default

It Should. Not a lot just a little like if you are running 8 min now you should get around 8 1/2 to 9 min with the 086 pipe.
thenova70ss is offline  
Old 12-07-2009, 08:09 PM
  #6  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (6)
 
Show871's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 241
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Just curious....running on a really tight dryslick track with a 053 pipe now. It seems to break loose with a hard hit. In stead of using a different clutch setup, do some people use a top end pipe like 086 and use the low end lack of punch, to smooth out the power, and hook up better?
Show871 is offline  
Old 12-07-2009, 08:14 PM
  #7  
Tech Master
iTrader: (32)
 
sickpuppy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Gardner,KS
Posts: 1,624
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

The 053 is designed to emphasize the bottom end, where the 086 is designed to be even and smooth from bottom to top. It isnt designed as a top end pipe. So yeah, it could help tame the bottom end while also giving better mid to top end also.
sickpuppy1 is offline  
Old 12-07-2009, 08:19 PM
  #8  
Tech Master
iTrader: (32)
 
sickpuppy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Gardner,KS
Posts: 1,624
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Oh, and Quad, if It was me, I'c go with the Dynamite. Only for the reason of the stinger. The Dynamite has a reinforced "web" on the stinger to help keep it from getting bent or broke in a side hit, or casing a jump, depending on how the pipe is angled. The Ofna does not have that. Still , both are good pipes, the Dynamite just might be more durable.
sickpuppy1 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 03:55 AM
  #9  
Tech Elite
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Quad Racer 34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: OHIO
Posts: 2,973
Trader Rating: 4 (83%+)
Default

ok thanks everyone
Quad Racer 34 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:45 AM
  #10  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
houston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sherwood,OR
Posts: 15,844
Trader Rating: 96 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Quad Racer 34
ok thanks everyone
Low end based pipes usually create better runtime.

9853 or similar = good runtime
9886 or similar = decent runtime. Less than 53 style


9886 = screamin top end with a hard hitting powerband at about 1/4 throttle


Yes I know this for fact
houston is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:54 AM
  #11  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Maximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by houston
Low end based pipes usually create better runtime.

9853 or similar = good runtime
9886 or similar = decent runtime. Less than 53 style


9886 = screamin top end with a hard hitting powerband at about 1/4 throttle


Yes I know this for fact
Not on a Picco dude ! 053 sucks ass on a Picco IMHO...... loses tons of power from bottom to top as opposed to a 086.....It also gobbles up the fuel.....
Maximo is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 09:59 AM
  #12  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (96)
 
houston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sherwood,OR
Posts: 15,844
Trader Rating: 96 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Maximo
Not on a Picco dude ! 053 sucks ass on a Picco IMHO...... loses tons of power from bottom to top as opposed to a 086.....It also gobbles up the fuel.....
all my referrals are based on what pipes do on novarossi engines

yes i am a lil biased


picco engines are good but right now not too poular in the race for fuel economy and smooth power
houston is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 10:26 AM
  #13  
Tech Master
iTrader: (55)
 
8&stuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In.
Posts: 1,401
Trader Rating: 55 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Quad Racer 34
will the Dynamite 086 pipe perform as well as the OFNA 086? will they be the same or perform different? im looking for a pipe that will tame the low end power down as much as possible and have real good top end. im putting it on a jammin jpx.21 and need as much runtime as possible.
any suggestions on other pipes or anything please let me know!
thanks
i used a dynamite 086 with an ofna short header on my jpx and it worked out much the same as the ofna 086 as i have it now. 053 looked good as well but suffered in runtime maybe 30 seconds per tank and wasnt quite as smooth. another good pipe is the jp4 on the jpx but burns almost a minute less runtime. any of the 3 are great on a jpx 21
8&stuff is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 10:29 AM
  #14  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Maximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by houston
all my referrals are based on what pipes do on novarossi engines

yes i am a lil biased


picco engines are good but right now not too poular in the race for fuel economy and smooth power


Due to dollar and price differences Picco's are popular here in Canada..... plus many of our tracks are dirt where the extra power works well....I like lots of engines, but the torque of the Picco's really works well here, not to mention they are priced very good.
Maximo is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 10:31 AM
  #15  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (11)
 
Maximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,901
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 8&stuff
i used a dynamite 086 with an ofna short header on my jpx and it worked out much the same as the ofna 086 as i have it now. 053 looked good as well but suffered in runtime maybe 30 seconds per tank and wasnt quite as smooth. another good pipe is the jp4 on the jpx but burns almost a minute less runtime. any of the 3 are great on a jpx 21
On my modded JPX 21's we get about 11 minutes with a JP4 ...very good track pipe for my engines...broad powerband and good mileage..... 086 lets them really scream, but runtime is not quite as good.......053 does nothing for them, feels like less power everywhere with a real noticeable lack of top end RPM...
Maximo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.