R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-08-2008, 09:31 AM   #1
Tech Fanatic
 
tdeal823's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West, Ohio
Posts: 951
Trader Rating: 30 (100%+)
Default !! READ !! All RB C6 owners. i need your input

I have a CEO MODS RB C6. I need pipe info. I normally run vspecs but got this motor in on trade. I have the fowling pipes to use.
JP2
JP3
OS 2050
OS 2060

What are your thoughts? I'm not buying a new pipe just for this motor so please don't tell me what pipe to go out and buy.
Thanks Guys
tdeal823 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 09:43 AM   #2
Tech Champion
 
Maximo's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,900
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

use a 9883

oops 9853 !

the other pipes will sap the life out of the motor..... if your using it in a buggy and want to de-tune it the RB 2045 works well......but if you want the motor to open up to its full potential the 9953 is the pipe to use...

Last edited by Maximo; 01-08-2008 at 10:01 AM.
Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 09:45 AM   #3
Tech Addict
 
TMizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 644
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

lol
__________________
Chassis:
Team Magic B8rs - USA Team

Sponsors:
GO TECH ENGINES (Factory Team) | VP Pro (Factory Team) | EB MODS (Factory Team) | RICHES BREW FUEL | COMPETITION PRODUCTS
TMizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:02 AM   #4
Tech Champion
 
Maximo's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,900
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMizzle View Post
lol
You like the 9853 as well ?
Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:19 AM   #5
Tech Elite
 
rezenclowd3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Solvang, CA
Posts: 2,367
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to rezenclowd3
Default

Personally, and I think that most would with the matching pipe would agree, the 2045 pipe would work the best with the engine.
__________________
OOMSGFX.COM (no longer painting, but take a look for fun!), Roadrunners RC Club
"Racing drivers have balls, unfortunately, none of them are crystal" (David Coulthard)
"I believe the average IQ of a NASCAR fan is only marginally above the things that hit the windscreen during the race. "
rezenclowd3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:48 AM   #6
Tech Master
 
RBMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Clara CA
Posts: 1,264
Default

Sorry but the 2045 & 2020 work the best on my C6. Also I get more than 12 mins with the 2045 on a regulation tank with a 6.5 ventury.
__________________
-EMBX6,T8 1400, RX8, 5S Lipo ,Elite-RC, RCM tray
-EMBX6,T8 1350, RX8, 5S Lipo ,Elite-RC, RCM tray
-B44 (Novak)
-ROAR 4 cell rule Blows
RBMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 11:14 AM   #7
Tech Adept
 
casterdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cibolo Texas
Posts: 204
Default

I have had the standard C6 and still have a RBMods Extreme mod version............. a cheap 053 makes these motors rip.........had a $$$$$ 2045 and sold it, they were dogs with it.

S'up Super.........
__________________
Mugen MBX7/WERKS CRE-B6,Stock B6,Stock B2/Werks 2013,2057,2058
RC10GT2-FT, Dynamite Platinum .12
VP-Racing Powermaster 20% and 30% Race Fuel
Official NON-EXPERT
casterdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 01:29 PM   #8
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,237
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

in most race conditions my 2045 gave me 8 min + run time and when i set my throttle to 90% or higher i could still run with about anything down the straights. thing is though about any decent engine can be tuned to be as fast as the top engines. i wouldnt tune for that i would tune for a solid driveable power band
mugenlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 01:43 PM   #9
Tech Champion
 
Maximo's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,900
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

on the4 X-Dyno the RB C6 on the 2045 made 1.15 HP with a very weak power curve.... withthe 9853 the motor has a broad flat power curve and makes 1.45 hp...the TQ was also higher across the board with the 9853........... the RB 2045 is EFRA legal..so its a noise restriction pipe...a 9853 is not EFRA legal, and its designed for engine output, not noise restriction......I am sure the 2045 works fine, but its definitely not the most suted pipe to make the most output.... its obviously a pretty restrictive pipe.....
Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 02:45 PM   #10
Tech Master
 
SkarTisu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,669
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to SkarTisu Send a message via Yahoo to SkarTisu
Default

Quote:
I'm not buying a new pipe just for this motor so please don't tell me what pipe to go out and buy.
You guys must have missed that part.
__________________
Marshall Skare
Team Associated - Reedy Powered - JConcepts - LiveRC.com
SkarTisu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 03:02 PM   #11
Tech Elite
 
rezenclowd3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Solvang, CA
Posts: 2,367
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Send a message via AIM to rezenclowd3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkarTisu View Post
You guys must have missed that part.
Well, I did miss that..

Why don't you go out and try all the pipes that you have then? My guess is that the JP2 or JP3 will be better than the OS pipes on the RB.
__________________
OOMSGFX.COM (no longer painting, but take a look for fun!), Roadrunners RC Club
"Racing drivers have balls, unfortunately, none of them are crystal" (David Coulthard)
"I believe the average IQ of a NASCAR fan is only marginally above the things that hit the windscreen during the race. "
rezenclowd3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 03:13 PM   #12
Tech Champion
 
Maximo's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,900
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkarTisu View Post
You guys must have missed that part.
I Missed that too..may bad !


trial and error with the pipes mentioned...
Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 03:49 PM   #13
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,237
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximo View Post
on the4 X-Dyno the RB C6 on the 2045 made 1.15 HP with a very weak power curve.... withthe 9853 the motor has a broad flat power curve and makes 1.45 hp...the TQ was also higher across the board with the 9853........... the RB 2045 is EFRA legal..so its a noise restriction pipe...a 9853 is not EFRA legal, and its designed for engine output, not noise restriction......I am sure the 2045 works fine, but its definitely not the most suted pipe to make the most output.... its obviously a pretty restrictive pipe.....
i dont care too much what a dyno says the way the car drives and the way that the power gets used by the driver means alot more. very rarely from what i see does the fastest engine wins races anyway.
mugenlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 04:11 PM   #14
Tech Champion
 
Maximo's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,900
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugenlife View Post
i dont care too much what a dyno says the way the car drives and the way that the power gets used by the driver means alot more. very rarely from what i see does the fastest engine wins races anyway.


The fastest driver always wins the races..wether he runs a RBC6 or a SH .21, driving skill is what wins the races.... a dyno is just a measuring tool that allows you to visibly see the output and powerband of engine and pipe combinations.... Its up to the driver to decide on the power output they are looking for to match their style and track conditions........But if someone is winning races with a RB C6 2045 combo, they will also win with a C6 9853 combo, they will just notice a little more power on tap..there wasn't a huge difference, the 9853 doesn't take anything away from the C6 over the 2045.
Maximo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 04:31 PM   #15
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,237
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

at least you are honest in how you evaluate them..on most other boards i argue this all i get in return is "numbers don't lie" which might be true but the never tell the whole truth either lol
mugenlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Track Owners Please Read RCwife Northwest Racers 43 05-09-2007 08:14 AM
JR XS-3 owners please read djrfan Australian Racing 20 12-16-2005 05:44 PM
TC3 owners,who upgraded,please read! jtcfanof3 R/C Items: Wanted to Buy 4 07-08-2004 04:51 PM
3PK owners...read please anthonynorth R/C Items: For Sale/Trade 4 03-13-2003 01:11 PM
Indoor track owners-Please read rayhuang Electric On-Road 5 09-22-2002 06:03 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 11:26 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net