R/C Tech Forums

Go Back   R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-20-2007, 03:30 PM   #1
Tech Regular
 
lowey79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 356
Default The Port Debate...

Here's a question for all the engine guru's to discuss as i'm interested in what your responses are....

How many transfer ports do you believe is optimal and why?

There are a lot of engines out there these days, each with different port arrangments and i'm wondering if it's really nessessary to have a 5,6,7+ port sleeve when engines like the OS Speed or V-spec (i'm sure there's more) are doing so well with just 3

Are engine manufacturers making things more complicated than they need to be?
lowey79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 03:54 PM   #2
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 379
Default

I was wondering the same thing because it seems like companies are trying to make us think the more ports the faster, but O.S. V-Spec is a good example of this being false.
lanerbrainer205 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 05:01 PM   #3
Tech Adept
 
johnkemp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: mildura
Posts: 141
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

isnt more ports faster why then are companys like os making 3 port motors confused
johnkemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 07:16 PM   #4
Tech Regular
 
lowey79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnkemp View Post
isnt more ports faster why then are companys like os making 3 port motors confused
I guess it depends on your school of thought.... most of my 2 stroke experience is based around motorbikes, where, to my knowledge, the only reason the ports have bridges between them is to hold the rings in the piston, otherwise the ports would be bigger and fewer.... Hence why i wonder if 5-7 ports is really needed in an engine with no rings?
lowey79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:56 PM   #5
Tech Champion
 
teeforb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego & Compton CA
Posts: 7,202
Trader Rating: 94 (100%+)
Send a message via Yahoo to teeforb
Default

well i know on-road typically has more ports (7-9) than off-road. on-road is more targeted for speed. I never seen any on-road engines less than 7 ports.
__________________
$$ Team High Budget $$
17.5 stock buggy fb page
https://www.facebook.com/groups/17.5stockbuggy/
teeforb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 08:57 PM   #6
Tech Fanatic
 
GenReaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 895
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to GenReaper
Default

Less ports = more bottom end power, more ports = power in the upper RPM range.

If you got a fast high speed track more ports, if you have a technical track with many infield turns, less ports is better, unless you clutch the crap out of it.
__________________
---------------------------------
Trex 700E 12S Scorpion 4035 560kv
Trex 600E
HPI Baja 5B SS
My videos : http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=genreaper
GenReaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 10:40 AM   #7
Tech Fanatic
 
jatoman1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: slidell, louisiana
Posts: 943
Trader Rating: 4 (75%+)
Send a message via Yahoo to jatoman1992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenReaper View Post
Less ports = more bottom end power, more ports = power in the upper RPM range.

If you got a fast high speed track more ports, if you have a technical track with many infield turns, less ports is better, unless you clutch the crap out of it.
+1
__________________
Pre-mix:
Kawisaki KX125-bored out to a 134cc, VForce reed valves, FMF gold series pipe and shorty silencer, phathead racing cyl head w/ interchangeable domes, and wiseco flat to piston
Nitro:
Ofna Ultra LX Pro- Axial .28 1S w/ JP-2 Pipe, Hitec HS5645MG(steering) and Hitec HS625MG(Throttle/Brake)
Electric:
Losi Micro-T- stock
Coming soon: Associated FT B4- stock

Ofna LX Pro as a roller w/ extras- $150
Starter box(1/8 buggy) w/12V battery- $70
micro T- $50 OBO
Axial .28 1S- 6 gal. thru- $50 OBO
jatoman1992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 09:21 PM   #8
Tech Elite
 
22Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wanamingo Mn
Posts: 3,080
Trader Rating: 67 (100%+)
Default

Our 8 port 421b has more bottom end than our 21-5 with 5 ports.

Rex
22Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2007, 02:26 PM   #9
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 349
Default

Lets not forget about the 3 port OS Speed. It has a very fast top end and great bottom.
kmorast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2007, 05:01 PM   #10
Tech Elite
 
joe of loath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bristol, England, United Kingdom
Posts: 4,857
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

ports are just to change engine charecteristics. say you have an engine with loads of top end, you change the ports to allow some ofthat top end into the middle and bottom end.
__________________
HPI E-Firestorm - Tamiya TA05 racer (carbon chassis, 10.5 brushless etc) - LRP Blast S10 BX - Revo 2.5r truggy conversion (in progress)
joe of loath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2007, 05:10 PM   #11
Tech Regular
 
mremtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 420
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenReaper View Post
Less ports = more bottom end power, more ports = power in the upper RPM range.

If you got a fast high speed track more ports, if you have a technical track with many infield turns, less ports is better, unless you clutch the crap out of it.
SO NOT TRUE !! There is more to ports than led to believe , and yes the
421Bs' are utterly insaine on the bottom to the point they are very hard to drive when the track is slick. Modified they are simply stellar but not as good on fuel as say an OS.
So the port debate rolls on.
Now as for Novarossi , it's all in the crankcase and cranks that really determine what you will have for bottom . The larger bearing engines seem to have really nice bottom end ,and the older- smaller bearinged versions are much more violent . So take it for what it's worth and run crazy with it
mremtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2007, 07:48 PM   #12
Tech Fanatic
 
GenReaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 895
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Send a message via MSN to GenReaper
Default

Whats a 421b?

Im guessing its a motor with a longer stroke than engines of the same capacity.
It was a general comment.
__________________
---------------------------------
Trex 700E 12S Scorpion 4035 560kv
Trex 600E
HPI Baja 5B SS
My videos : http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=genreaper
GenReaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 05:03 AM   #13
Tech Regular
 
mremtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 420
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

THe 421B is a Novarossi engine that was out a year or so back , they are 8 port engines ,now it's called an 821.
http://www.novarossiusa.com/product_...products_id=57
mremtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 03:18 PM   #14
Tech Elite
 
rltanner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lake Havasu City,AZ
Posts: 2,681
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Thankz for the info
__________________
Mugen MBX6
Mugen MBX6 Truggy
rltanner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2007, 03:38 PM   #15
Tech Master
 
MassiveMods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,977
Default

My understanding on ports are that the top 3 ports are the ones responsible for the timing charachteristics of the engine in conjunction with exhaust and inlet timing .

The lower ports are traditionally used as relief ports. When on the down stroke the fuel can flow out of the side of the sleeve as opposed to the bottom of the crank case , this can help with top end but is not manditory to achieve it

If you use efra approved 3 port .12 engines as an example they are all 3 port engines yet have different top end and bottom end ... All their differences are created by port timing changes. And .12 engines normally rev out higher than .21 's etc .. I do realise this is because its a smaller engine cc but they have no problem getting up there in terms of RPM ..

MM
__________________
Engine development manager Rifling Pty Ltd. Nitro fuel designer : Neo + World record title holder 2012 Austalian Nationals 147.6 KPH , 1 st 2 nd and TQ Australian National Buggy titles 2012. Victorian State title 2012 Neo + , South Australian state title ON and Off Road 1/8 2012 Neo + :-) QLD State Titles 2012 1st buggy & trruggy + TQ Neo + MG66 RX7 1st Sportsman Class Truggy QLD State Titles 2012 !! Nitro Addicts Australia . com
MassiveMods is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
30% NITRO DEBATE GSPOT Nitro On-Road 28 06-03-2008 08:21 PM
Budget racing ESC debate WheelNut Electric Off-Road 10 08-21-2006 12:33 AM
After run oils debate. Edwards Nitro On-Road 17 09-10-2005 11:00 PM
My Great TC EP vs Nitro Debate scoobydo Electric On-Road 56 02-28-2005 07:44 PM
The Great Magazine Debate DerekB Chat Lounge 107 06-15-2004 02:33 PM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. It is currently 10:10 PM.


Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.2.1
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise Content © 2001-2011 RCTech.net