Anyone try the Jammin Jp4?
#1
Anyone try the Jammin Jp4?
Has anyone tried the JP4 pipe yet?? If so how do you feel about it?
#6
This is what some people think of the JP4, back in the "Jammin X1 CR , so close..." post (end of page 135 onwards...):
I always liked the JP1 on my Jammin engine more than any of the other JP pipes as well. Recently one of the guys tried the JP4 and his top speed and fuel economy went up but the low end snap went down. Go with a slightly stiffer clutch spring to compensate.
I haven't actually tried this as I no longer have my Jammin engine, but I do know the JP4 is a good pipe for the engine.
I always liked the JP1 on my Jammin engine more than any of the other JP pipes as well. Recently one of the guys tried the JP4 and his top speed and fuel economy went up but the low end snap went down. Go with a slightly stiffer clutch spring to compensate.
I haven't actually tried this as I no longer have my Jammin engine, but I do know the JP4 is a good pipe for the engine.
#8
Tech Elite
iTrader: (17)
I don't think the JP-4 was made to be the latest and greatest of all the JP pipes. The JP-4 is a 3 chamber pipe designed for Europe, thats why it has an EFRA number on it. Just like the Novarossi 9901 pipe (dual on/off road pipe). You can only use a 3 Chamber pipe in Europe now, because they are quieter. Noise is big issue in Europe. I believe a large race coming up was just cancelled becaused of the noise issue with the town. It may have better power in one area and less in another IMO.
#11
Well, I ran the JP4 with my RB928...oooooooohhh boy!! That pipe and engine combo works great!! I was listeing to the sound of the motor. It is a little but not much quieter. It does have a great sound. The performance was great!! I'm ordering another for my C6BB7T!! For motors that have a wild and high RPM range this is the pipe!