Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Let's talk modified 1/12 >

Let's talk modified 1/12

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree62Likes

Let's talk modified 1/12

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2016, 07:08 PM
  #496  
Tech Fanatic
 
RobS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chatham, Ontario
Posts: 980
Default

Can't wait to hear the reasoning behind this...
RobS is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 08:00 PM
  #497  
Tech Master
iTrader: (2)
 
mikel33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,597
Trader Rating: 2 (75%+)
Default

Originally Posted by avs
there must be more to this IFMAR change. 2x voltage should only mean more speed. how is that considered a necessary adjustment to the status-quo? perhaps they are moving to a 380 can from the age-old 540 can? (but I don't even know of a sensored 380 available on the market) maybe this is a spoof, it is hard to see the logic behind it.

of all the recent chatter on this subject, adjusting the 'superstock' class from 13.5 to 8.5 or 6.5 made the most sense. A stock class, an open class and something more towards the middle that could bridge the two.
Apparently mod 1/12 was too slow and easy to drive.
mikel33 is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 08:31 PM
  #498  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (32)
 
syndr0me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 5280 Raceway
Posts: 13,279
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Won't going to 2S limit capacity? Perhaps they're thinking it will force people to run slower motors to make run time? Didn't Howard already educate us on why this won't be a net change?
syndr0me is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 08:42 PM
  #499  
Tech Master
 
patorz31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton Ab
Posts: 1,554
Default

Wasn't there talk of making TC 1s not that long ago???
patorz31 is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 11:06 PM
  #500  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
howardcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 3,784
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by RobS
Can't wait to hear the reasoning behind this...
Me too. But "reasoning" might be too strong a word!

Originally Posted by patorz31
Wasn't there talk of making TC 1s not that long ago???
howardcano is offline  
Old 10-06-2016, 05:56 AM
  #501  
Tech Lord
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 10,191
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by patorz31
Wasn't there talk of making TC 1s not that long ago???
Yes. Thankfully that died.

Didn't someone have a thread about going to 380 size motors, about the time LiPo was coming into the hobby? Don't remember that guy...
jiml is offline  
Old 10-06-2016, 06:19 AM
  #502  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Austria
Posts: 14
Default

btw., I tried 6,5 blinky last weekend. BRCA and whoever just created the PERFECT stock class with this. It´s fast, easy to control and enough motor not having to fight about which motor rocks this week.
But honestly, this ain´t mod. It´s Pro Stock, but not mod, especially without boost.
Not alot difference to the old European 10,5 stock class which was fine till BRCA and EFRA ruled towards useless 13,5 ...

In mod you need to hear and feel the motor rev up and scream as soon as the turbo kicks in on the straight.
But yes, it´s fun to drive.
----- is offline  
Old 10-06-2016, 06:45 AM
  #503  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
RedBullFiXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Intergalactic Planetary
Posts: 6,542
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Wink

Originally Posted by robk
Yes that is correct. 2s in 1/12....now you may appreciate my last post a little more. Note ROAR voted AGAINST change.
Interesting...
RedBullFiXX is offline  
Old 10-06-2016, 02:08 PM
  #504  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 118
Default

do you guys driving modified

use brake before a corner ???

or only throttle control

thanks
truggy100 is offline  
Old 10-06-2016, 11:29 PM
  #505  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
DesertRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sniffin the 'Sauce Fumes
Posts: 4,104
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by truggy100
do you guys driving modified

use brake before a corner ???

or only throttle control

thanks
If I take a corner right and I have the correct front end alignment, my car doesn't need me to use the brakes to slow for corners. Sometimes I will tune in a little drag brake to give a little more steering, but I really don't like to use it as it makes other parts of the track a little less predictable, like coasting through a sweeper.

I also turned the brakes down to like 15% so if they get used in a panic mode it wont make the car completely use control.
DesertRat is offline  
Old 10-14-2016, 02:42 PM
  #506  
AE-Reedy
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 786
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

This thread sure died.
Where is the follow up to IIC?
I was there and watched. It was nice to see the cars with a little more control than the previous rules, but I do not feel the 6.5t is the right way to go. Not sure if the IFMAR 2s is right either but I want to see it in action before I condemn it.

I can give you some insight as to why IFMAR is looking to 2s.
#1 easier to operate all the electronics in the car with higher voltage. At the WC there were many cars going out of control due to Rxs dropping voltage. Also over heat was a major issue again leading to cars running out of control. This occurred during the TC part as well so not limited to 1s.
#2 Less runtime in the battery, you will have to motor down.

I wish we could have tried running a car at IIC with the 2s battery but sadly no one had any available.
Sean Cochran is offline  
Old 10-14-2016, 03:28 PM
  #507  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
robk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Posts: 8,201
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Sean
Certainly you have good points, but it would have been better to do some real world testing before jumping in as IFMAR has. At least it would be easier to see if there would be unintended consequences.
robk is offline  
Old 10-14-2016, 03:45 PM
  #508  
AE-Reedy
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 786
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by robk
Sean
Certainly you have good points, but it would have been better to do some real world testing before jumping in as IFMAR has. At least it would be easier to see if there would be unintended consequences.
i agree but also think that IFMAR had done nothing then this experiment would never happen. It's 2 years till the next WC so if some people do try and find problems things can still be changed.
Sean Cochran is offline  
Old 10-14-2016, 04:45 PM
  #509  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
silden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 982
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Sean Cochran
This thread sure died.
Where is the follow up to IIC?
I was there and watched. It was nice to see the cars with a little more control than the previous rules, but I do not feel the 6.5t is the right way to go. Not sure if the IFMAR 2s is right either but I want to see it in action before I condemn it.

I can give you some insight as to why IFMAR is looking to 2s.
#1 easier to operate all the electronics in the car with higher voltage. At the WC there were many cars going out of control due to Rxs dropping voltage. Also over heat was a major issue again leading to cars running out of control. This occurred during the TC part as well so not limited to 1s.
#2 Less runtime in the battery, you will have to motor down.

I wish we could have tried running a car at IIC with the 2s battery but sadly no one had any available.
Sean you are right with the cars were more under control, but the 6.5 blinky class reintroduced the stock finger. because no real throttle control was required on the black carpet. unlike to open mod.

I think that the 2S way will eventually take the motor of the week thing out of stock 1/12. instead 17.5/13.5 it will be 25.5 and
21.5.
silden is offline  
Old 10-14-2016, 05:00 PM
  #510  
R/C Tech Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 10,278
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

The only issue with 6.5 appeared to be hand wound motors differences. Some people had big power... Most didn't.
The fast cars didnt look out of control.. And the back of A/b/c mains weren't a mess.
I'll be running 6.5 tomorrow and at the Halloween Classic next week...
hanulec is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.