Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree24Likes

HPI HB PRO 5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2014, 09:43 AM
  #1  
Tech Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Geberit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 774
Default HPI HB PRO 5



http://www.rctech.net/forum/newthrea...=newthread&f=2

New TC on the way!
We Are Ninja likes this.
Geberit is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:02 AM
  #2  
Bar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Geberit
Hmm HB Pro 5 wouldn't that make it a shaft driven car, Pro4 was the best car I ever owned
Bar is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:07 AM
  #3  
Tech Apprentice
 
fitforbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Skara, Sweden
Posts: 67
Default

"HPI promises "a complete re-think of the standard TC design""

That's interesting. Hope they can keep their promises. If i recognize the design, I'll sue their asses for what they're worth.
fitforbattle is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:11 AM
  #4  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
wwddww34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 2,560
Trader Rating: 9 (91%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bar
Hmm HB Pro 5 wouldn't that make it a shaft driven car, Pro4 was the best car I ever owned
+1
I still have my Pro4 and I still love it. I hope the Pro5 is a shaft driven car. Maybe it could have a very low CG just like the Awesomatix A700 does.

Click on the pic below to go to HPI Racing's official Pro 5 announcement page.

Last edited by wwddww34; 10-02-2014 at 10:23 AM.
wwddww34 is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:13 AM
  #5  
Tech Apprentice
 
fitforbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Skara, Sweden
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by wwddww34
+1
I still have my Pro4 and I still love it. I hope the Pro5 is a shaft driven car. Maybe it could have a very low CG just like the Awesomatix A700 does.
The Russiomatrix cylindical dampers would surprise me coming from HPI.

Also, if it's orange I'll be mad. HB are purple. The orange "5" is a worrier...
fitforbattle is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:16 AM
  #6  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (377)
 
peter george's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: queens ny
Posts: 9,808
Trader Rating: 377 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by fitforbattle
"HPI promises "a complete re-think of the standard TC design""

That's interesting. Hope they can keep their promises. If i recognize the design, I'll sue their asses for what they're worth.
Wow I've been waiting so long for this . Now I can retire the best HPI made that was clearly ahead of its time .... The pro-3
peter george is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:22 AM
  #7  
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (75)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,329
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Aside from the Pro 4, all the previous HPI Pro cars were belt drive.

I'm really hoping for a shaft drive car with the motor mounted in the correct configuration and not like the TB04 layout...

Shaft drive with updated TC technology =
RCknight likes this.
Dan is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:23 AM
  #8  
Bar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by peter george
Wow I've been waiting so long for this . Now I can retire the best HPI made that was clearly ahead of its time .... The pro-3
Is that a joke, it was a terrible car especially as standard as it had a plastic chassis on it?
RCknight likes this.
Bar is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:29 AM
  #9  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,326
Default

The pro3 had the right idea. The Losi Type-R and the TA06 too. Maybe they are revisiting that design who knows...
redbones is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:38 AM
  #10  
Bar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 626
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by redbones
The pro3 had the right idea. The Losi Type-R and the TA06 too. Maybe they are revisiting that design who knows...
It was an interesting concept, I think they later found out that putting everything down the centre doesn't work. Pro 2 was a decent car with saddle batteries
Bar is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:45 AM
  #11  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
 
aloksatoor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N California
Posts: 3,152
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Hahaha aren't they getting too ahead of themselves, they still cannot keep the d413 on the shelves (doesn't seem like they sell that many), its just parts are still spotty and now a new car? Why can't some hobby company with enough $$ just pump some damn money into their operation? Their cars are top notch pieces of engineering, but qc and volume are still suffering. End of rant, if they can make something like a awesomatix for half the price, ill be back in tc
aloksatoor is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:46 AM
  #12  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 131
Default

I think HPI/HB win the "Null Announcement" award for 2014, it tells me that there isn't probably anything worth getting excited about with this car when the initial announcement for the car tells you ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about the car.
trackout is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:51 AM
  #13  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lynnwood, Washington
Posts: 1,203
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Will be interesting to see what they come up with. I don't think it will be too similar to awesomatix, they currently have a patent on the dampening design and how they're adjusted.
malkiy is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 10:57 AM
  #14  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Posts: 1,570
Default

Originally Posted by Geberit


New TC on the way!
Interesting!
RCknight likes this.
JiuHaWong is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 11:02 AM
  #15  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (377)
 
peter george's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: queens ny
Posts: 9,808
Trader Rating: 377 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Bar
Is that a joke, it was a terrible car especially as standard as it had a plastic chassis on it?
The penguin rc CF chassis fixed all flex issues. And there was no front spool available or a gear diff. It was a nun finished idea that should have been more carefully designed . In my opinion they rushed it and nobody could forgive them for that. It's not a joke. Pro-3 was the right idea way b4 anybody was looking at battery down the center. Let's hope this won't be an epic failure .
peter george is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.