Thunder Tiger TS2e RWD Touring Car
#2
too.....much....plastic....arrrgggghhh !!!
#5
#6
Not that we need any more classes, but it might end up being a super cheap extremely spec class. Time will tell.
-melon
#7
Tech Addict
Converted my T1 FK05 into RWD and laid the battery transverse like this one. with the esc on the other side. In that configuration it was quite fun.
But i am still pusled they managed to make it so complex. Servo should have been slap bang in the midle with the esc behind and radio somewhere else. And is that battery slot only for nimh cells? looks like it..
And why no upper wishbone in the front????????????
Surely that will break easier..
wierd weird wierd.
But i am still pusled they managed to make it so complex. Servo should have been slap bang in the midle with the esc behind and radio somewhere else. And is that battery slot only for nimh cells? looks like it..
And why no upper wishbone in the front????????????
Surely that will break easier..
wierd weird wierd.
#8
MattsNorway could you post pix of your xray ? I remember you talking about it in the sabre thread.
About the Thunder tiger car, the concept is interesting but the car... isn't. Just too cheap.
About the Thunder tiger car, the concept is interesting but the car... isn't. Just too cheap.
#9
This should be the new USVTA spec chassis! A rear wheel drive late 60's early 70's Musclecar, what a concept!
#11
Tech Addict
Here is the Xray T1 Fk05 in all its horror and wrongness.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/72823890/Bilde%20023.jpg
Those front tires did NOT work.
The motor was mostly running on very low power but when the grip was good i could crank it up to 40-50% i think it was. its a 4.5T
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/72823890/Bilde%20023.jpg
Those front tires did NOT work.
The motor was mostly running on very low power but when the grip was good i could crank it up to 40-50% i think it was. its a 4.5T
#13
Tech Regular
You can go either way on the front end. Pan car style has an advantage in it's simplicity. I'm not a fan of a the battery placement. You can always build your own. As for no demand-I'm afraid you could be right. Don
#14
Did you guys see the TS4e as well? They both share most of the same parts, with the exception of the front suspension.
http://www.thundertiger.com/product/6582-F.html
http://www.thundertiger.com/product/6582-F.html
#15
Tech Regular
This should be the new USVTA spec chassis!