R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Electric On-Road (https://www.rctech.net/forum/electric-road-2/)
-   -   Traction Rolling - how to solve it (https://www.rctech.net/forum/electric-road/787609-traction-rolling-how-solve.html)

Martin Crisp 01-22-2014 01:21 PM

Traction Rolling - how to solve it
 
Often times when you go to a big race the grip comes up more than your local track and your setup not only does not work, but you traction roll :(

here are some approaches I have used to help reduce traction rolling

http://www.setupworkbench.com/fighting-traction-roll/

Cheers,
Martin Crisp

skater-deez1 01-22-2014 01:27 PM

Good stuff,thanks for posting!!!:nod::nod:

miller tyme 01-22-2014 04:09 PM

Martin posting again, do I smell a comeback??

Atechbh 01-22-2014 04:20 PM

How about rear end lack of traction. The rear on my TA06 slides out bad on turn in and a bit coming out of corners

Martin Crisp 01-22-2014 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by miller tyme (Post 12932657)
Martin posting again, do I smell a comeback??

You never know!!!

I do miss it.

Martin Crisp 01-22-2014 05:07 PM


Originally Posted by Atechbh (Post 12932705)
How about rear end lack of traction. The rear on my TA06 slides out bad on turn in and a bit coming out of corners

Not knowing what your setup is let me suggest a few things.

Raise the rear roll Center

Add some droop to the front of your car

Lower the front roll Center

bkspeedo 01-22-2014 11:17 PM

Martin, There's few things i'm surprised you didn't add to your list.

1. Increase front track width if same as rear, or increase track width front and rear if car is very narrow.

2. Reduce front camber

3. If running regular weight body try light weight

Any reason these would not be good options?

VooDooPH 01-23-2014 01:24 AM

wouldn't reducing front camber aggravate traction rolling? depending on the roll center, the car would have a higher chance of rolling on the outside edge of the outside wheel on corner entry. wouldn't this have a higher chance of tucking the sidewall in and eventually flipping the car?

Boostinswifty38 01-23-2014 09:09 AM

Not necessarily. Remember camber is a product in which you generate the widest use of that tire and surface area contacting the surface you race on. If you are 2 deg. Front camber and are utilizing the full width of the tire in a corner that's more corner speed and higher bite. Less camber on same surface will allow the vehicle to grip a bit less and "slip" across the surface a bit more, because you are not using all of your rubber on the surface for grip. The front will push a bit more, and not allow the cars inertia to carry over that outside front tire as much.

Another thing I see as a helper in traction rolling is anti-dive. I've recently started to experiment with this. Helps greatly with augering. Thoughts?

Martin Crisp 01-23-2014 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by bkspeedo (Post 12933938)
Martin, There's few things i'm surprised you didn't add to your list.

1. Increase front track width if same as rear, or increase track width front and rear if car is very narrow.

2. Reduce front camber

3. If running regular weight body try light weight

Any reason these would not be good options?

Reducing camber will help for sure, as will the lighter body. I was trying to focus more on perhaps the less known approaches.

As for the front track width, I would say maybe yes, maybe no. I say maybe no, because if you widen the front track width more than the rear, then the rear tends to roll more than the front, causing the front inside tire to raise up more raising the CG more...leading to traction rolling. I would suggest keeping the track width the same front and rear will lead to better results.

Martin Crisp 01-23-2014 10:08 AM


Originally Posted by Boostinswifty38 (Post 12934825)

Another thing I see as a helper in traction rolling is anti-dive. I've recently started to experiment with this. Helps greatly with augering. Thoughts?

yes anti-dive can help as well, but it can also make the car more edgy on turn-in and that abrupt change can sometimes cause the car to hike up before the suspension fully compresses depending on spring rates, shock valving roll centers, track width etc. Having said that, anti-dive is something to for sure experiment with.

Martin Crisp 01-23-2014 10:17 AM

updated the blog post
 
btw - I added the suggestions above to the blog post

Johnn27 01-23-2014 10:18 AM

rear traction
 

Originally Posted by Atechbh (Post 12932705)
How about rear end lack of traction. The rear on my TA06 slides out bad on turn in and a bit coming out of corners

What rear stiffners are you using on the car??? Aluminum or composite ???that might make a big difference also on the ta06...

R3VoLuTiOn 01-23-2014 10:21 AM


Originally Posted by Martin Crisp (Post 12934981)
Reducing camber will help for sure, as will the lighter body. I was trying to focus more on perhaps the less known approaches.

As for the front track width, I would say maybe yes, maybe no. I say maybe no, because if you widen the front track width more than the rear, then the rear tends to roll more than the front, causing the front inside tire to raise up more raising the CG more...leading to traction rolling. I would suggest keeping the track width the same front and rear will lead to better results.

First thing I do on most of my cars is shim out the front / narrow the rear when traction rolling. I guess I should try a different approach! Thanks Martin

When will we finally get to meet you on the West Coast?

gearhead_22 01-23-2014 10:39 AM

martin I have your setup workbench on my phone and it is wonderful.


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 01:16 PM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.8
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.