Schumacher Mi5
#1396
..p
#1399
Tech Adept
#1400
Tech Regular
Really? the battery is moved further forward to be in line with the electrics on the other side with the mid motor setup, if he needs further weight then he is better off putting stick on weights either side.
#1401
Tech Champion
iTrader: (165)
With the mid-motor configuration, there is a more forward weight bias and I tried to have the battery inline with the steering servo, motor and ESC to try to balance things. Stick-on lead weight can be used for fine tuning later. Besides, I don't have a shorty lipo and used what I already own.
#1402
Tech Adept
With the mid-motor configuration, there is a more forward weight bias and I tried to have the battery inline with the steering servo, motor and ESC to try to balance things. Stick-on lead weight can be used for fine tuning later. Besides, I don't have a shorty lipo and used what I already own.
#1404
Hi I'm thinking of changing to mid motor setup could someone tell me what parts I need to do this thanks
#1405
Tech Regular
well the front alloy screws work as intended.
sheared one on the left suspension arm/wishbone this morning
sheared one on the left suspension arm/wishbone this morning
#1407
Tech Rookie
I used to have a mi4lp. This new mi5 looks amazing!
#1408
Here you go! In stock and ready to ship ..
http://www.discountrcstore.com/U4290...i5_p/u4290.htm
..p
#1409
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
There is an extra pair of holes drilled in the top deck rails, and I just used an extra U2482 brace. The position is actually just after the rise in the rails, and above the two lower deck screw positions that are used to mount the steering sub-assembly. Flipping the brace upside down, clears the belt fine.
As for the rear braces, are they a must have? Honestly, I can't say yet. I literally put them on the car, and ran them all day. Didn't do a back to back without them, so I can't yet comment on the difference they make.
Otherwise, had a good day with the car today, in preperation for our state titles next week. Started out with the Grainger WLRC setup, with a couple of little tweaks... and car was really good from the get go. Ran through a load of changes, and the main findings for me were to use the front gear-diff (as fast as a spool, but more consistent), take out a little front droop (5.0 on a gauge), and using the extra front top deck brace mentioned above. Car seemed to handle the bumps in the track well, with good steering all through the turns, and carried good corner speed. Had a few comments on how the car looked, and it also seems to suit my driving style... quite competitive too boot.
Still more to try out on friday, and then into racing proper on saturday. Setup here.
Ed
As for the rear braces, are they a must have? Honestly, I can't say yet. I literally put them on the car, and ran them all day. Didn't do a back to back without them, so I can't yet comment on the difference they make.
Otherwise, had a good day with the car today, in preperation for our state titles next week. Started out with the Grainger WLRC setup, with a couple of little tweaks... and car was really good from the get go. Ran through a load of changes, and the main findings for me were to use the front gear-diff (as fast as a spool, but more consistent), take out a little front droop (5.0 on a gauge), and using the extra front top deck brace mentioned above. Car seemed to handle the bumps in the track well, with good steering all through the turns, and carried good corner speed. Had a few comments on how the car looked, and it also seems to suit my driving style... quite competitive too boot.
Still more to try out on friday, and then into racing proper on saturday. Setup here.
Ed
#1410