Schumacher Mi5
#1741
#1742
#1743
Tech Regular
#1744
Tech Apprentice
Mid Motor & 2.00mm Chassis
Has anyone tried this combination ?
#1745
#1747
#1748
#1749
Schumacher part U4244
Maybe Ed will chime in and offer more info if we overlooked something.. hope it helps! ...
#1750
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
Quietman is correct. There will be a front brace to compliment the rear brace that will further stiffen the chassis and help create a better balanced feel from front to rear. Because our current steering rod has no real ackerman adjustment, there will also be ( 2 ) available steering plate options of different lengths. We've not yet seen them in person however, the shorter one should offer more ackerman ( less aggressive ) with the longer ones offering less ackerman ( more aggressive ). The shock towers thickness has been increased to 4.3mm to help minimize deflection in the shock angle as well firm up to top of the bulkheads, helping to make the chassis flex a bit less and drive more accurately..
Maybe Ed will chime in and offer more info if we overlooked something.. hope it helps! ...
Maybe Ed will chime in and offer more info if we overlooked something.. hope it helps! ...
http://ets.redrc.net/wp-content/gall...hofermi5-5.jpg
Think of them as the difference between running one-piece or split blocks on other cars. So running the braces reduces the flex at that end of the car, which can change the balance and reduce the overall grip at that end.
The shock towers, look similar positions (the holes don't look lower), so thickness is probably the main thing.
Regarding the ackerman plates, I would hazard a guess that they move the mounting hole in-wards, rather than back, but worth checking that.
I've been running ackerman plates with the mounting hole moved in towards the centre of the car 1mm, based on the advice of Grainger and Matt W. I found that it helps to give the car more steering, but more linear as well (at least when used with the centre ball rack as well, easier to see here http://ets.redrc.net/wp-content/gall...hofermi5-9.jpg). I have tried plates with the hole 2mm in, but wasn't so sure on them, so have just kept the 1mm in versions on both my cars.
HiH
Ed
#1753
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
The rack, was also pretty simple. Firstly filled in the cut-out in the rack, by cutting a strip of carbon to size, and sanding it down to the right thickness, before Aralditing it in place. Then I drilled and tapped new holes in the middle of the rack, 8mm apart.
HiH
Ed
#1754
I recently been running the mi5 just to take a break from the dirt and have had great success with the car. My good friend gdcpbdcop has an identical set up with the only difference is the 2mm chassis. the only difference I feel is how responsive the car is. I do not like that car to be that twitchy for me. I have been preferring the stock chassis with the braces. the only complaint I have is I can't keep up with those awsomatix car on the straight it always pulls 3-4 car length every thime on the straight and it looks like he is running boost or something I have to work my ass off to catch him on the infield and always do by the time we hit straight again he is gone. my question is how can I free this thing up?
#1755
I recently been running the mi5 just to take a break from the dirt and have had great success with the car. My good friend gdcpbdcop has an identical set up with the only difference is the 2mm chassis. the only difference I feel is how responsive the car is. I do not like that car to be that twitchy for me. I have been preferring the stock chassis with the braces. the only complaint I have is I can't keep up with those awsomatix car on the straight it always pulls 3-4 car length every thime on the straight and it looks like he is running boost or something I have to work my ass off to catch him on the infield and always do by the time we hit straight again he is gone. my question is how can I free this thing up?