Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree167Likes

Tamiya XV-01

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2016, 12:02 PM
  #946  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 544
Default Droop droop droop

I think I found it now. No really, why my steering was so unbalanced with the durning on power exit, yeah the battery weight was a MAJOR factor in reducing the spin out.

But the biggest helper, was adjusting the droop screw on the one side. The side I was turning (left) would always spin out much easier than the right. I noticed that the inner wheel was spinning more (lifting), which means all the weight was on the outer wheel. When that outer wheel breaks lose, you have instant rear end spin out. So I lowered that inside wheel just a little, (tightening the droop screw) and bam! Now both wheels have traction when power on exiting. I cannot believe how much of a difference droop makes!

I can now swing side to side and because the rear wheels don't lift as much during weight transfer, the car is predictable and I no longer need to compensate for one side's oversteer.
4roller is offline  
Old 09-05-2016, 01:06 PM
  #947  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 544
Default Damper Angle

I am so very pleased that my car is now consistent when doing hard turns. I think this even helped with the premature wearing of inner front tires, circle of death, yeah it still happens, but I think a little less.

Anyway, I was playing around with damper angles, which actually lead to my droop screw discovery.

Before the droop screws, I actually set my rear dampers to a more vertical position. This made the rear dampers feel a little more linear.




I just took some pictures to show some of the available variations afforded by the xv-01.

So far, I prefer a more upright position in the rear. I think if the car's rear was heavy, more damper angle rear would be useful.

Last edited by 4roller; 09-05-2016 at 01:18 PM.
4roller is offline  
Old 09-05-2016, 02:38 PM
  #948  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
fyrstormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Posts: 7,982
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I've been running single O-rings in my TRF shocks for over a year, even on the off-road cars, and they haven't given me any problems. No leaking that I can notice.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 09-06-2016, 10:02 AM
  #949  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
firefoxussr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 352
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Whoops...

Parts on order....
firefoxussr is offline  
Old 09-06-2016, 10:33 AM
  #950  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by firefoxussr
Whoops...

Parts on order....
Mad Stance
4roller is offline  
Old 09-06-2016, 12:56 PM
  #951  
Tech Initiate
 
bvrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Buena Vista, Colorado
Posts: 20
Default

XV-01 racing...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWZqNs42k2M
bvrc is offline  
Old 09-06-2016, 07:56 PM
  #952  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
fyrstormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Posts: 7,982
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

What broke?
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 09-06-2016, 10:11 PM
  #953  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 544
Default

Wow so much off-road fun from firefoxussr and bvrc!

Meanwhile in on-road land (I should have got the TC right?) I got some new gearing.



72T Jconcspts silent spur, and Robinson Racing 38T pinion.



Side by side with my previous gearing (which was awesome) 77/32





Before and after, nothing sexy here. In fact, the pinion is too big to use a normal sized screw driver to tighten the motor screws, I had to set the mesh, remove the pinion to tighten the screws, then re apply the pinion.

The new gearing sounds a lot more luggy. When coasting, it doesn't sound as nice as the previous gears. I checked the mesh twice, it's fine. It's just that the new ratio seems to push the motor rotor poles at a different pace than the other set. The things we sacrifice for speed, right? I can already tell it's faster, in my little backyard concrete area where I test the car. When I have some time I'll bring it out to the street for a speed run.

I look at the size of this pinion and scoff, "on roaders." Back in my off-road days, we'd be pushing it if we went over 27T, and that was really big!
4roller is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 01:19 AM
  #954  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
fyrstormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Posts: 7,982
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

If you think that gearing is high, check this out:



That's the 40/65 gearing on my XV-01 FF. I had to figure out how to fit a non-slipper spur gear into the slipper clutch so I could still control the maximum torque delivered to the front wheels.

Of course, then there's the 40/55 gearing in my TB-04R, but that's a very different kind of touring car:


Last edited by fyrstormer; 03-29-2018 at 04:32 PM.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 07:26 AM
  #955  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by fyrstormer
If you think that gearing is high, check this out:



That's the 40/65 gearing on my XV-01 FF. I had to figure out how to fit a non-slipper spur gear into the slipper clutch so I could still control the maximum torque delivered to the front wheels.

Of course, then there's the 40/55 gearing in my TB-04R, but that's a very different kind of touring car:

Nice! What did you use in the center of the spur to keep it from wobbling? Looks like a metal washer or bushing?

I think if I ever want to goto a lower FDR, then I'll have to either switch back out to the non slipper (nah) or come up with a solution like yours.

Having direct power (like stock) seems a little dangerous for the drivetrain. After I installed the new gears, I locked my slipper, and found my belt was clicking. The last thing I want is a worn out belt. So I immediately tightened it up. I also added a washer to the belt tensioner, moving it out slightly, so that both belt roller bearings would engage evenly.

No slipper seems like too much torque. How do other TC's like the TA, TB and TRF chassis handle this torquey businesses?
4roller is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 09:17 AM
  #956  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
firefoxussr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 352
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 4roller
Mad Stance


Originally Posted by fyrstormer
What broke?
Nothing surprisingly, just ejected a hinge pin/spacers & driveshaft. Only found the hingepin
firefoxussr is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 09:37 AM
  #957  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (94)
 
Raman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,349
Trader Rating: 94 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by firefoxussr


Nothing surprisingly, just ejected a hinge pin/spacers & driveshaft. Only found the hingepin
that hinge pin spacer is 2.6 mm too.. pita to find.. lost the doggy bone as well huh?
Raman is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:41 PM
  #958  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
fyrstormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Posts: 7,982
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by firefoxussr
Nothing surprisingly, just ejected a hinge pin/spacers & driveshaft. Only found the hingepin
One of many good reasons to use CVDs. Nothing to lose.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 10:54 PM
  #959  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
fyrstormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia, Near DC, USA
Posts: 7,982
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 4roller
Nice! What did you use in the center of the spur to keep it from wobbling? Looks like a metal washer or bushing?
There's an inconspicuous donut-shaped piece on the NN parts tree -- NN12 according to the online manual -- that I stumbled across while trying to find a way to fit that spur onto the slipper shaft. I don't know for sure what NN12 was originally meant for, but given that it's the perfect fit for this application (the hole in the spur is English whereas the slipper shaft is Metric), I find it hard to believe it wasn't intended for this purpose.

Originally Posted by 4roller
I think if I ever want to goto a lower FDR, then I'll have to either switch back out to the non slipper (nah) or come up with a solution like yours.
The friction material I used is a set of Traxxas teflon friction pegs. I eventually filled all 16 holes in the spur, I just didn't bother to take a second picture. I had to shave-down the outer edges of the slipper plates to allow the smaller spur gear to fit without rubbing, though I suppose I could've just let the outer edges of the slipper plates grab onto the spur gear instead of using the teflon friction pegs.

Originally Posted by 4roller
No slipper seems like too much torque. How do other TC's like the TA, TB and TRF chassis handle this torquey businesses?
Driver discipline. Touring cars are generally built for racing even if they're not actually used that way by most owners, so it's assumed by the designers that the drivers will learn how to ease into the throttle to avoid overloading the drivetrain. Also, for racing purposes the reduction in rotating mass is considered a good tradeoff for having no slipper clutch. Also, belt-driven touring cars generally have larger pulleys on the front and rear diffs, hence more contact area for the belts to grip. Shaft-driven touring cars can get away with not having slipper clutches because there isn't anything to stretch or break, as long as the wheels don't get jammed, which is very unlikely when driving on-road.
fyrstormer is offline  
Old 09-08-2016, 06:13 AM
  #960  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 544
Default

Originally Posted by fyrstormer
One of many good reasons to use CVDs. Nothing to lose.
+1 although I did lose a clip spring once, I don't know how, but luckily they supply 3 in the package, one for spare.
4roller is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.