Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team CRC Xti 1/12th Scale!! >

Team CRC Xti 1/12th Scale!!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree221Likes

Team CRC Xti 1/12th Scale!!

    Hide Wikipost
Old 03-02-2021, 05:42 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team CRC Xti 1/12th Scale!!
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: tobamiester

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2014, 04:24 AM
  #1366  
Tech Master
iTrader: (43)
 
WIITA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,618
Trader Rating: 43 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ghoppa
Question Wiita
What does running the Xti rear pod and top plate to a Altered Ego main chassis do?
Kave is right. I tried all the combos. Just felt better with the short short. Kave runs the long/short and is just as fast. Tony block runs the short/long and is just as fast. I just think it's a personal like not a speed thing. The basic altered ego kit would be a great place to start. I have driven Tonys short long car and it's very good!!
WIITA is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 06:47 AM
  #1367  
Tech Master
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,432
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

So many chassis to choose from!

Right now I have a transverse car with the solid chassis #32580 (stock xti geometry) and xti pod. So that's long/short, correct?

So, the solid alter ego chassis from the car kit, chassis #3223 is 8mm shorter and if I put it on I would have a short/short car, yes?

Any reason I can't simply re-drill the chassis to move the front end plate back a few mm to get a short/short car with the long solid chassis? That would make swapping from long/short to short/short fairly simple. In fact, it would make swapping from long to short chassis and inline or transverse fairly simply all with the same chassis plate on the car.
Troy Carter is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 09:20 AM
  #1368  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
waltss2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 461
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

I bought a fairly new Xti from a local racer a couple weeks ago and I rebuilt it to my liking and I love you t even though I have had some CRC drivers tell me that I would hate the car exspically on a low bite track for which my home track is a low bite track and it ran very well. I was told to get the Altered Ego chassis plate but I don't see anything wrong with the stock in line chassis plate.
waltss2k is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 05:13 PM
  #1369  
Tech Master
iTrader: (40)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,917
Trader Rating: 40 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew S
but I still don't get it... LOL!
You just couldn't resist, could you?
davidl is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 06:37 PM
  #1370  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 263
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I was banging my head before I read your post and I was like, surely this makes it clear!
Andrew S is offline  
Old 03-12-2014, 09:03 PM
  #1371  
Tech Master
iTrader: (40)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,917
Trader Rating: 40 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew S
I was banging my head before I read your post and I was like, surely this makes it clear!
Actually there are two errors in my post. First, the antenna mount is plastic and they also include the battery positioners that hold the battery in rear or forward position in transverse configuration. But why be picky anyway?

So at the end, if you have the Xti kit and add the conversion I mentioned, you have all the parts to make all the configurations of inline/transverse, short/long, short/short, long/long and long/short.
davidl is offline  
Old 03-13-2014, 10:13 AM
  #1372  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
waltss2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 461
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

I was told to run the protoform tr12 body on my inline chassis because it's was the best for this set up but I seen the Crc Mohawk body and I am going to try it out Fri. But why wouldn't tbe Mohawk be as good as the TR12.
waltss2k is offline  
Old 03-15-2014, 08:57 AM
  #1373  
Tech Master
iTrader: (40)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,917
Trader Rating: 40 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Slapmaster6000
.................................................. ....

Sometimes the inline car can be aggressive on turn entry and the best way I found to calm that down is to use the camber riser plates.

....
Once again that is spot on, Brian. Extra people showed for last nights race and the group built a little more, but not "fly paper" tacky. Had trouble with the car oversteering on some high speed entries. Put in the 2.5 riser and took out the 2.0 riser and the car was money. Beat some pretty good drivers this time.
davidl is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 06:24 AM
  #1374  
Tech Addict
 
jasons56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 700
Default

How do you bias a 13.5 car for more performance at the top of a run? I've consistently been much more competitive at the end of a run than the beginning. I'm seeing only about 2 tenths difference from the top of a run to the bottom.

I'm running D 3.5, HT rotor, 3.3" rollouts. Motor temps around 130-140 F. Pulling out around 3000 mah.

In club racing, this strategy works, but at big races where there is a deeper field I don't want to give up positions in the beginning that I can't get back later. Hard to pass guys that make no mistakes!

I am assuming a more aggressive setup may be part of the solution?

If so, what adjustments make the car just a touch more aggressive at the top of a run while not making the car too inconsistent?

Maybe more dope on front tires for less time??

Or should I be looking at more camber and less traction compound?
jasons56 is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 06:28 AM
  #1375  
Tech Addict
 
jasons56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 700
Default

Another thought, if I'm mainly looking for more high speed aggression when the car is faster at the top of a pack, maybe a body with more front downforce would help?

I'm running the Bomb R at the moment.

Originally Posted by jasons56
How do you bias a 13.5 car for more performance at the top of a run? I've consistently been much more competitive at the end of a run than the beginning. I'm seeing only about 2 tenths difference from the top of a run to the bottom.

I'm running D 3.5, HT rotor, 3.3" rollouts. Motor temps around 130-140 F. Pulling out around 3000 mah.

In club racing, this strategy works, but at big races where there is a deeper field I don't want to give up positions in the beginning that I can't get back later. Hard to pass guys that make no mistakes!

I am assuming a more aggressive setup may be part of the solution?

If so, what adjustments make the car just a touch more aggressive at the top of a run while not making the car too inconsistent?

Maybe more dope on front tires for less time??

Or should I be looking at more camber and less traction compound?
jasons56 is offline  
Old 03-18-2014, 07:12 AM
  #1376  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
howardcano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 3,784
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jasons56
Another thought, if I'm mainly looking for more high speed aggression when the car is faster at the top of a pack, maybe a body with more front downforce would help?

I'm running the Bomb R at the moment.
You can also move the body forward on the chassis to move the center of pressure. That doesn't generate more total downforce, but does move the grip forward.
howardcano is offline  
Old 03-19-2014, 07:12 AM
  #1377  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (27)
 
hydro18679's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 119
Trader Rating: 27 (100%+)
Default diffuser

With the XTI and the introduction of the slider pod came the option for the bolt on CRC diffuser. So while the merits of this part seem debatable, what is the deal with cost of this plastic part? Seems to be available only on Team CRC website for $45, nearly a full quarter of the cost of the full car. This plastic part is more expensive than the carbon chassis!? Twice as much as a carbon axle!? how can this be?
hydro18679 is offline  
Old 03-19-2014, 10:14 AM
  #1378  
Tech Champion
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hawaii, USA
Posts: 7,191
Default

It's machined not molded...hence the extra cost.
InspGadgt is offline  
Old 03-19-2014, 11:30 AM
  #1379  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default Ball Link end piece

Where do you guys get these open ended ball link ends that I see in all of the pictures of this chassis. They are used on the damper tubes. Are they being used on the inboard side of the tubes along with the outside part of the tube? The XTI kit comes with standard ball cups and I think that the open ended ones will make it easier to do maintenance on the tubes. Any help on this would be well appreciated.

Thanks
Aquaracer is offline  
Old 03-19-2014, 11:37 AM
  #1380  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (85)
 
jason cheng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis Minnesota
Posts: 4,299
Trader Rating: 85 (100%+)
Default

I think walmart superstore now has crc parts part# 32694
jason cheng is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.