Most realistic F1? F104 vs. FGX suspension
08-03-2012, 09:59 AM
#1
Most realistic F1? F104 vs. FGX suspension
Hi,
Is the upcoming IFS for the FGX less realistic than the standard?
I was reading this great guide to building the FGX (rcformula1.com.au) and on the first page the following was written:
"RC Formula1 Tip - the FGX already pushes the boundaries with it's independent rear suspension. All other F1 chassis have either T-Bar rear suspension or Pivot Ball Link rear suspension. Adding independent front suspension may be a bridge too far in terms of moving away from the spirit of F1 chassis design."
I wonder, does he refer to the F1 RCs or is it a comparison between the suspension of a real F1 car?
I've been one click from buying the F104, but when I saw the rear suspension action of the FGX on this video (youtu.be/1oh9NYoI-5Y?t=1m44s), I was sold:
Sorry I can't post URLs until I have posted a bit more orz
Is the upcoming IFS for the FGX less realistic than the standard?
I was reading this great guide to building the FGX (rcformula1.com.au) and on the first page the following was written:
"RC Formula1 Tip - the FGX already pushes the boundaries with it's independent rear suspension. All other F1 chassis have either T-Bar rear suspension or Pivot Ball Link rear suspension. Adding independent front suspension may be a bridge too far in terms of moving away from the spirit of F1 chassis design."
I wonder, does he refer to the F1 RCs or is it a comparison between the suspension of a real F1 car?
I've been one click from buying the F104, but when I saw the rear suspension action of the FGX on this video (youtu.be/1oh9NYoI-5Y?t=1m44s), I was sold:
Sorry I can't post URLs until I have posted a bit more orz
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
