Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing Part 2 >

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing Part 2

View Poll Results: what's your tire choice?
Protoform
46
30.67%
HPI
104
69.33%
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree4318Likes

U.S. Vintage Trans-Am Racing Part 2

Old 10-16-2012, 02:55 PM
  #2146  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (115)
 
hotrodchevy14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,549
Trader Rating: 115 (100%+)
Default

have not seen hpi post here in quite some time....someone shake the tree!! wake up hpi more bodies please..!
i'd like to see the firebird and dodge dart..
hotrodchevy14 is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 02:57 PM
  #2147  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I know I miss Andy H.
snoopyrc is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 03:02 PM
  #2148  
Tech Master
iTrader: (35)
 
Waflet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: helena, alabama
Posts: 1,930
Trader Rating: 35 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DontChangeUSVTA
Funny how the '64 Pontiac Tempest is not mentioned anywhere in the Historic Trans Am roster, but it did race in the 1971 season. Here's an article about the "Grey Ghost".
  • 1964 Pontiac Tempest "Grey Ghost"
Hideeho
It's results are listed at
http://www.historictransam.com/Results.html
Along with a bunch of cool under 2l European cars that don't get mentioned much.
Waflet is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 03:08 PM
  #2149  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
wwddww34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 2,560
Trader Rating: 9 (91%+)
Default

Would it be possible to just make a replacement nose piece to convert HPI's 1978 Pontiac Firebird into a 1972 Firebird?

Last edited by wwddww34; 10-16-2012 at 03:38 PM.
wwddww34 is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 03:08 PM
  #2150  
Tech Adept
 
Geno-Machino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The other "O"town
Posts: 100
Default

Originally Posted by trytowin
#5 is a Nova.
Is now. He realized that he grabbed the Camaro file at first but has since fixed it with the Nova file.
Geno-Machino is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 03:34 PM
  #2151  
Tech Adept
 
DontChangeUSVTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Las Colinas, TX
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by wwddww34
Would it be possible to just make a replacement nose piece to convert HPI's 1978 Pontiac Firebird into a 1972 Firebird?
That sounds very reasonable. Based on the picture below, the HPI '78 Firebird body comes with a spare nose piece in the bag, but the body itself looks like it comes with the nose already attached (unlike Protoform's J71 body where you have to attach the nose).


If there was a replacement nose piece to make it into a '72 Firebird, then you could just cut off the '78 nose and put on the '72 nose.
DontChangeUSVTA is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 04:08 PM
  #2152  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

The rear window is different, but you could mask it to look like the 70. Honestly the hood and fenders are a bit different as well.
snoopyrc is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 05:12 PM
  #2153  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (54)
 
Flying Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 4,442
Trader Rating: 54 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by hotrodchevy14
have not seen hpi post here in quite some time....someone shake the tree!! wake up hpi more bodies please..!
i'd like to see the firebird and dodge dart..

Have an email into them as well.....nothing in return yet. Ive hit up a bunch of manufacturers in the RC community for more USVTA support. As I get responses Ill post like I did the others.

Originally Posted by wwddww34
Would it be possible to just make a replacement nose piece to convert HPI's 1978 Pontiac Firebird into a 1972 Firebird?

Like snoopy said, There is a considerable difference. I owned a 77 Trans Am and a buddy had a 74 Firebird. The 77 era bodies were alot more square where the Earlier 70's were more round. Same with camaros. Early 70's rounded and late 70's more square body lines.
Flying Monkey is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 06:05 PM
  #2154  
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Ed Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: hagerstown
Posts: 1,376
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default switch over

My track will be switching over to the usvta rule in the new year. Is there anything to watch out for? Have others had issues with systems out of the box?
Ed Z is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 06:32 PM
  #2155  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (54)
 
Flying Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 4,442
Trader Rating: 54 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Z
My track will be switching over to the usvta rule in the new year. Is there anything to watch out for? Have others had issues with systems out of the box?
Good to hear. Always glad to see tracks running full USVTA rules.

"systems out of the box"?
Flying Monkey is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 06:43 PM
  #2156  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
shadowracer24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: lakeland fla.
Posts: 869
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

I think he may be asking about the combo sets. I have run the novak combo system for about 4 months of hard racing and have had no issues at all. Just switched over to the hobbywing esc and very pleased with it after I finally got the brakes to work.
shadowracer24 is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 07:00 PM
  #2157  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (49)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PITTSBURGH, PA
Posts: 2,164
Trader Rating: 49 (100%+)
Default

Yea, we are switching over, and had someone get a set out of the box that was DOA. Anything else to watch for? Been reading through all of this, but I could only come up with a few things I'm going to discuss with Ed when I see him this weekend.
oceanhighz is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 07:08 PM
  #2158  
Tech Elite
 
IndyHobbies.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,010
Default

I don't know if you guys have been keeping up with the problems the plastic model guys have been facing but the licensing issues from companies have become a nightmare in terms of cost and legal procedures. I read an article about it somewhere.

It used to be that manufacturers like Ford, Chevy, etc. were complimented that a company wanted to do a model of their vehicle. Back then, they looked at it as free marketing! Now, they expect a portion of the profits from the sale of the model and the ongoing licensing rights are not free either. Same with companies like Boeing (aircraft) and railroad lines, etc. As a result, the cost of plastic models is rising to pay those licensing fees. Some manufacturers are no longer including brand decals or using brand names.

So...my point is that its probably hard as heck for companies like HPI to get the rights to produce a new body. I assume they have to pay royalties too? I wonder...

Last edited by IndyHobbies.com; 10-16-2012 at 07:19 PM.
IndyHobbies.com is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 08:05 PM
  #2159  
Tech Master
iTrader: (41)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Grand Portage, MN
Posts: 1,369
Trader Rating: 41 (100%+)
Default

With the Edge (mongoose) and 25.5 is a great setup with tonnes of brakes.
jdeadman is offline  
Old 10-16-2012, 10:17 PM
  #2160  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
snoopyrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tunnel Hill GA
Posts: 5,046
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by IndyHobbies.com
I don't know if you guys have been keeping up with the problems the plastic model guys have been facing but the licensing issues from companies have become a nightmare in terms of cost and legal procedures. I read an article about it somewhere.

It used to be that manufacturers like Ford, Chevy, etc. were complimented that a company wanted to do a model of their vehicle. Back then, they looked at it as free marketing! Now, they expect a portion of the profits from the sale of the model and the ongoing licensing rights are not free either. Same with companies like Boeing (aircraft) and railroad lines, etc. As a result, the cost of plastic models is rising to pay those licensing fees. Some manufacturers are no longer including brand decals or using brand names.

So...my point is that its probably hard as heck for companies like HPI to get the rights to produce a new body. I assume they have to pay royalties too? I wonder...
I had a conversation with Dale Epp about this. Licensing is a brutal nightmare. You are dealing with attorneys and not the owners of the license in most cases and they fail to recognize that this is a consumable piece that will often be destroyed during the course of its use. It got this way in the late 70's or early 80s when Revel made more money on models of a particular car than GM made on the real deal. Granted Revel sold a ton of the model kits. Atorneys smell money and then they screw everything up. Its the American way. Thats why protoform often avoids any resemblence of an actual production vehicle in their touring car shells. So they call them LTC and give them other codes like that.

Mazda and Ford are pretty good about licenses. Notice that there are a lot of Mustang shells available? They are easier to deal with than other manufacturers. Anyway if you want more shells then you would be better off sending email to the maker of the car as well as guys like HPI and McAllister.

Off topic but we all know that Orange County Choppers makes more money from T-shirts than they do from selling bikes.
snoopyrc is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.