Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Ask Steve "The Evicerator" Weiss >

Ask Steve "The Evicerator" Weiss

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Ask Steve "The Evicerator" Weiss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2008, 01:00 PM
  #6196  
Tech Master
iTrader: (5)
 
timmay70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,701
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

What is the estimated release date for the Mongoose? By estimated I mean summer, fall winter or spring (northern hemisphere)?
timmay70 is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:15 PM
  #6197  
The Evicerator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,161
Default

Well a rotor that gives a higher gauss reading generally tends to "pull harder" than a rotor with a lower reading. Meaning that you could "gear it up" more and it would pull the gear better in most situations.

Honestly though whenever you are looking at numbers like that you have to remember that the numbers are relative to the meter you are using only.

I'd say it's probably a good rotor... but without measuring your current rotor with that exact meter you will never know exactly "how much better" it is.

Originally Posted by trailranger
Steve,

I was looking at ebay for a spare rotor for my 3.5 and came across this bizarre listing on ebay



So the question is, compared to normal rotor. What would be the advantage to having a rotor like that?
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:16 PM
  #6198  
The Evicerator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,161
Default

Timmay,

Stuff is starting to move through production as we speak... I'd say we're looking good for a "summer" release.

Originally Posted by timmay70
What is the estimated release date for the Mongoose? By estimated I mean summer, fall winter or spring (northern hemisphere)?
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 06:05 PM
  #6199  
Tech Fanatic
 
trailranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 946
Default

A local tack guy measured my 4 rotors and all were between the 1230 and 1290 range.
trailranger is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 04:57 AM
  #6200  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17
Default

hi Steve, can you help me with my novak 10.5 motor's gearing? I've send you a mail but your mail Steve@.... doesn't work...
Ryo Saeba is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 05:04 AM
  #6201  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (32)
 
STLNLST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 9,942
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Ryo Saeba
hi Steve, can you help me with my novak 10.5 motor's gearing? I've send you a mail but your mail Steve@.... doesn't work...
Most out my way are gearing 4.9-5.3 depending on track design and straight away. Some even go 5.5 on the smaller tracks.
STLNLST is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 08:36 AM
  #6202  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 969
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Steve - Will the NOV5465 5-Amp Universal BEC work with a 2S Lipo receiver pack, Airtronics M11 2.4GHz receiver, and 3 servos for use in a large scale vehicle? The 3 offerings from Novak seem like they all do nearly the same thing. Which would be the best for this application? Also, when is Novak going to release a Voltage Cutoff and Voltage Regulator in one package?
Tony Vega is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:48 AM
  #6203  
The Evicerator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,161
Default

From my understanding of the zubak meter those readings are pretty good

Originally Posted by trailranger
A local tack guy measured my 4 rotors and all were between the 1230 and 1290 range.
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:49 AM
  #6204  
The Evicerator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,161
Default

Hiya Ryo,

Generally I tell people to start out around 5.5 and go up from there if temperatures allow for it.

You always want to keep your motor running under 170 degrees!

Originally Posted by Ryo Saeba
hi Steve, can you help me with my novak 10.5 motor's gearing? I've send you a mail but your mail Steve@.... doesn't work...
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:51 AM
  #6205  
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
J.Filipow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,693
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Hi Steve! Good luck at the REEDY RACE!!!!
J.Filipow is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:54 AM
  #6206  
The Evicerator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,161
Default

Hey Tony,

That particular unit will probably be the best choice for your application.

As far as having a BEC/Lipo Cut off we do have a BEC/lipo monitor... which doesn't cut off... but if there is enough demand for an actually BEC/Cutoff I'm sure it could be done pretty easily with what we already have designed.

I will bring up your request and see what happens!

Originally Posted by Tony Vega
Steve - Will the NOV5465 5-Amp Universal BEC work with a 2S Lipo receiver pack, Airtronics M11 2.4GHz receiver, and 3 servos for use in a large scale vehicle? The 3 offerings from Novak seem like they all do nearly the same thing. Which would be the best for this application? Also, when is Novak going to release a Voltage Cutoff and Voltage Regulator in one package?
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:55 AM
  #6207  
The Evicerator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,161
Default

Hi J type!

Same to you! See you tomorrow or Thursday!

Originally Posted by J.Filipow
Hi Steve! Good luck at the REEDY RACE!!!!
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 08:53 AM
  #6208  
pH2
Tech Rookie
 
pH2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 12
Smile Shock Assembly (new to xray)

Hey Steve can you share your expertise on the following?

When assembling the shocks, there are two small o rings, one thinner one that goes around the base of the shock body and the thicker one on the piston shaft.

Do you build your shocks without the o-ring that goes on the piston shaft? What difference does this make?

Also are there any advantages to using the aluminum shocks?

Thanks,
Phillip
pH2 is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 09:42 AM
  #6209  
The Evicerator
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,161
Default

Hey Philip,

I always build my shocks up with both orings.

The o-ring on the shaft is necessary to "seal" the shock and keep the oil inside the shock... if you used the shock without that oring I believe all the oil would find its way out very quickly!

Sometimes setup-sheets are kind of difficult to decipher, but I believe what they are referencing is using an extra o-ring on the shock shaft *outside* of the shock body between the shock body and the eyelet for some added dampening near full compression.

Originally Posted by pH2
Hey Steve can you share your expertise on the following?

When assembling the shocks, there are two small o rings, one thinner one that goes around the base of the shock body and the thicker one on the piston shaft.

Do you build your shocks without the o-ring that goes on the piston shaft? What difference does this make?

Also are there any advantages to using the aluminum shocks?

Thanks,
Phillip
Steve Weiss is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 10:05 AM
  #6210  
pH2
Tech Rookie
 
pH2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 12
Smile Thanks

Thanks for the clarification Steve! That makes sense, I was just confused by the setup sheet. I had not read anything about using an extra o-ring on the outside.
pH2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.