Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
3Racing Sakura Zero S >

3Racing Sakura Zero S

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2Likes

3Racing Sakura Zero S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2013, 02:11 PM
  #2326  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
shadowracer24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: lakeland fla.
Posts: 870
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by sonspit
Yeah the motor does get hot. I installed a 3 racing heatsink and fan...how do you know when it's too hot..i have nothing to get the actual temp .is there another method
Touch a finger to the motor and cout 1001,1002 your okay. If it comes out 1001, OHHH $%#* then the motor is running to hot. Not trying to be a smartass here this actually works. If you can keep your finger on it for a count of a least three seconds the temp on average is around 150* The shorter the count the hoter the motor, but as stated earlier the best way is a good cheap temp sensor.
shadowracer24 is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 04:01 PM
  #2327  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
buckeye dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: hicksville ohio
Posts: 444
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by wollow86

You do need to move the hole where the root arm normally mounts to by 3mm centre to centre rearward on a zero chassis. Here's a pic installed in my hybrid:



Part number is SAK-X24/PK
what exactly are u talking about moving root arm hole? I would realy like to use this setup like the idea of easier to change spur gear.
buckeye dan is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 06:18 PM
  #2328  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
wollow86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hobart
Posts: 707
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by buckeye dan
what exactly are u talking about moving root arm hole? I would realy like to use this setup like the idea of easier to change spur gear.
I'll snap a photo when I get home that shows what you need to do. But the xi based chassis has the motor mount moved 3mm from where it is on the zero. But the only hole that doesn't line up is the motor mount root arm, which is the arm that attaches to the vmm's, and takes the motor top screw, which also screws into the chassis.

So if you use a xi mount on a zero you need to move it 3mm one way, or if you use a zero mount on an xi it goes 3mm the other way. Like I said I'll snap a photo when I get home which shows my (poorly) drilled and counter sunk hole from when I had the zero vmm on the xi chassis.
wollow86 is offline  
Old 01-14-2013, 07:00 PM
  #2329  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
buckeye dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: hicksville ohio
Posts: 444
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default thanks

thanks that will be big help
Originally Posted by wollow86
I'll snap a photo when I get home that shows what you need to do. But the xi based chassis has the motor mount moved 3mm from where it is on the zero. But the only hole that doesn't line up is the motor mount root arm, which is the arm that attaches to the vmm's, and takes the motor top screw, which also screws into the chassis.

So if you use a xi mount on a zero you need to move it 3mm one way, or if you use a zero mount on an xi it goes 3mm the other way. Like I said I'll snap a photo when I get home which shows my (poorly) drilled and counter sunk hole from when I had the zero vmm on the xi chassis.
buckeye dan is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 02:59 AM
  #2330  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
wollow86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hobart
Posts: 707
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by buckeye dan
thanks that will be big help
Sorry its so late. Here's the photo.



As you can see, there's a new hole a few mm forward of the motor mount root arm mounting hole. The car currently has a xi mount on an xi chassis. The hole further forward is for a zero mount on the xi chassis. So for an xi mount on a zero chassis, you need to make a new hole 3mm rearward of the stock hole. Does that make sense?
wollow86 is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:29 AM
  #2331  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
ta04evah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,616
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by wollow86
As you can see, there's a new hole a few mm forward of the motor mount root arm mounting hole. The car currently has a xi mount on an xi chassis. The hole further forward is for a zero mount on the xi chassis. So for an xi mount on a zero chassis, you need to make a new hole 3mm rearward of the stock hole. Does that make sense?
Yes it makes sense, you just want to be spot on the line when you drill the new hole though, a couple of mm out either way could end up twisting the lower deck?

Oh and an update on my problem. I'm not sure if this is a definitive answer or not as I need to test my theory out some more.
It could possibly be the gears that I'm using that are causing the noise.
I put a new spur & pinion gear in the car earlier today, and testing at a track tonight resulted in a quiet and silky smooth drive train.

Now here's my theory - The other gears I am trying to use have either had little or moderate use in a Tamiya TA05. As the TA05 has the motor in front of the spur gear and the pinion gear has to be reversed, ie grub screw side goes towards the outer end of the motor shaft, I'm believing that the way the gears wear in the ta05 cause the noise and binding feeling due the wear attributes on the teeth face are different between the 2 cars.

There may be still a slight problem with the motor mount as the gears are the most silent when only the bottom motor screw is tightened up, this is not ideal but could explain the binding feeling and added to that the different wear on the face other the teeth causing the noise.

Anyway it now seems like I am moving forward on nailing this problem so I'll do some more testing on the weekend and post updates on my findings.

Cheers
Rob.
ta04evah is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 07:58 PM
  #2332  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 38
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default upgrade for servo saver

hi all just got a zero s but found that the servo saver keep slipping after a while. . is there any upgrade or should i go with generic alu arm without protection?
sLowHoG is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 08:02 PM
  #2333  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
azeroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Da Burbs
Posts: 1,130
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

kimbrough heavy duty or x ray heavy duty work well i did the alu arm thing and lost 3 servo's in 4 runs
azeroth is offline  
Old 01-16-2013, 09:29 PM
  #2334  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (2)
 
ta04evah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,616
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by sLowHoG
hi all just got a zero s but found that the servo saver keep slipping after a while. . is there any upgrade or should i go with generic alu arm without protection?
A Tamiya high torque servo works well too. http://rcmarket.com.hk/product_info....oducts_id=1040
Using a aluminum arm without protection is a bad idea as mentioned above.

Tamiya also makes the alloy outer part of the servo so you can have it protected and minimise the flex from the standard plastic one. http://rcmarket.com.hk/product_info....oducts_id=4983

Cheers
Rob.
ta04evah is offline  
Old 01-17-2013, 06:20 AM
  #2335  
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 38
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

thanks bro
sLowHoG is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 05:18 AM
  #2336  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 217
Default

Correct me if I'm wrong and let me know if I'm right. Alipo battery with a higher c rating will deliver more current which in turn will equal more speed?
sonspit is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 05:38 AM
  #2337  
Tech Master
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast GA
Posts: 1,685
Default

Originally Posted by sonspit
Correct me if I'm wrong and let me know if I'm right. Alipo battery with a higher c rating will deliver more current which in turn will equal more speed?
In theory yes. what you will probably notice most is that the pack doesn't get weak or "fall off" late into the race. A higher c rating will be more consistent over a 6,8, or even 10 minute race provided you have enough milliamps to make the required run time.
6376vette is offline  
Old 01-19-2013, 05:52 AM
  #2338  
Tech Adept
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 217
Default

Originally Posted by 6376vette
In theory yes. what you will probably notice most is that the pack doesn't get weak or "fall off" late into the race. A higher c rating will be more consistent over a 6,8, or even 10 minute race provided you have enough milliamps to make the required run time.
ok. thanx
sonspit is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 05:21 AM
  #2339  
Tech Rookie
 
quickershifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
Default

Hi guys, I'm trying to get a FDR of 4.8 or close in my Sak S, changed the center pulley to 21t with stock spur 80t and pinion of 30t. The problem now is the belts (522t front & 171t rear) are so tight. Any compatible belt that I can replace to overcome this problem?
quickershifter is offline  
Old 01-22-2013, 05:30 AM
  #2340  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (165)
 
SteveM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: CANADA
Posts: 7,778
Trader Rating: 165 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by quickershifter
Hi guys, I'm trying to get a FDR of 4.8 or close in my Sak S, changed the center pulley to 21t with stock spur 80t and pinion of 30t. The problem now is the belts (522t front & 171t rear) are so tight. Any compatible belt that I can replace to overcome this problem?
The stock center pulleys are 20T and even at that the belts are tight. Most racers have opted for the 19T center pulleys along with the alloy spur gear adapter. You've gone the wrong way.
SteveM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.