Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree4Likes

Tamiya TRF417

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2011, 03:11 AM
  #691  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Bad-Andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: not here
Posts: 91
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Anyone who was at the Snowbirds care to share their setup with us? I was told there was at least one 417 in the stock A-main.
Bad-Andy is offline  
Old 02-10-2011, 08:06 PM
  #692  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
kschu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kota Kinabalu,Sabah
Posts: 4,605
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

I just tested roche Spool cup in my friend Trf416/417 Spool. they work without any problem. But i use 46mm bone for front.

Who likely to break the kits spool cup, can use it...

Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TRF417-bd02_417.jpg  
kschu is offline  
Old 02-10-2011, 08:26 PM
  #693  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
jonest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Johor, Malaysia
Posts: 3,142
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by kschu
I just tested roche Spool cup in my friend Trf416/417 Spool. they work without any problem. But i use 46mm bone for front.

Who likely to break the kits spool cup, can use it...

KS,

I'd like to try it out but I worry either the pin will break or corner entry would be stiffer (understeer). Btw, How much is it?
jonest is offline  
Old 02-10-2011, 10:19 PM
  #694  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
kschu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kota Kinabalu,Sabah
Posts: 4,605
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jonest
KS,

I'd like to try it out but I worry either the pin will break or corner entry would be stiffer (understeer). Btw, How much is it?
so far i use it in my car never have pin break problem...

i dont know if it'll cause understeer or not ...
kschu is offline  
Old 02-12-2011, 12:44 AM
  #695  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 517
Default

What is the thickness of the 417 chassis? Do you think it is too soft?
ioxqq is offline  
Old 02-12-2011, 02:20 PM
  #696  
Tech Addict
 
cyclone speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 621
Default

The thickness of the lower deck ( chassis ) is 2.25 mm i think.

Ok, I have a question please, im going racing tomorow, finished building my 417 a week ago, but what I dont get is the spacer on the front toe block ( 1C front, 1C rear ).
On most setup sheets I see 0.5 mm under the front 1C ( FF ) and the on the rear 1C ( FR ) I see 1mm. But in the instruction manual, when building my car, it says to put a 3 mm shim on the Front Rear 1C.
What am i suposed to do ? Im just trying to understand how does the spacer under the front toe block works .
Thanks
cyclone speed is offline  
Old 02-12-2011, 03:04 PM
  #697  
Tech Master
iTrader: (34)
 
veecee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,454
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

When the toe block is flipped at front-rear, the 3mm spacer gets it level with a non-flipped block. So 3mm on a flipped block is effectively 0mm.
veecee is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 01:41 AM
  #698  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Jamison R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: VA Beach
Posts: 3,624
Trader Rating: 66 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by veecee
When the toe block is flipped at front-rear, the 3mm spacer gets it level with a non-flipped block. So 3mm on a flipped block is effectively 0mm.
Exactly^ Rear block is flipped, causing need for spacer.
Jamison R is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 01:51 AM
  #699  
Tech Master
iTrader: (32)
 
chrisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,089
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

What is the difference in height, if any with the split blocks?

Do you still run the same spacer under them at the front?
chrisk is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 02:22 AM
  #700  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,386
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by chrisk
What is the difference in height, if any with the split blocks?

Do you still run the same spacer under them at the front?
No difference to the standard blocks in height.

HiH
Ed
TryHard is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 02:40 AM
  #701  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (58)
 
crabboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,001
Trader Rating: 58 (98%+)
Default

Had my first run with the 417 today and i must say it is better than the 416x.
i ran the standard kit set up and it worked great.
One think new we are running are the Roche spring retainers they are a bit larger in diameter than the Tamiya and work great with HPI springs.

Rhys
crabboy is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 05:16 AM
  #702  
Tech Initiate
 
CHICO1977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: JOHOR
Posts: 26
Default

Originally Posted by crabboy
Had my first run with the 417 today and i must say it is better than the 416x.
i ran the standard kit set up and it worked great.
One think new we are running are the Roche spring retainers they are a bit larger in diameter than the Tamiya and work great with HPI springs.

Rhys
Yes i agree i have been running the Roche retainers for quite some time now
CHICO1977 is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 05:45 AM
  #703  
Tech Addict
 
cyclone speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 621
Default

Hello,

Today I ran my TRF417 for the first time ( same as crabboy ), I must say that compared to my HB cyclone, it is MUCH nicer to drive and also easier to drive with a standar/comon setup.
Grip wise was very good, I had a tiny bit of traction rolling at the end of the last race but on the previous races, grip was very good.
My main problem was mid-corner steering... Initial steering was fine, exit was good but mid-corner steering was lacking. I had to slow down more to get the car around the curve. On-power mid corner steering was ok, but off power ( mainly during a hairpin ), mid-corner steering was missing.

-My question : how could I increase mid corner steering ?
-Side question : What is the difference between longer/shorter camber links ?
-Final question : Why are their more people using anti-dive in front these days ? What does it do ?

Thank you very much
cyclone speed is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 05:58 AM
  #704  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lugo, Spain
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by cyclone speed
Hello,

Today I ran my TRF417 for the first time ( same as crabboy ), I must say that compared to my HB cyclone, it is MUCH nicer to drive and also easier to drive with a standar/comon setup.
Grip wise was very good, I had a tiny bit of traction rolling at the end of the last race but on the previous races, grip was very good.
My main problem was mid-corner steering... Initial steering was fine, exit was good but mid-corner steering was lacking. I had to slow down more to get the car around the curve. On-power mid corner steering was ok, but off power ( mainly during a hairpin ), mid-corner steering was missing.

-My question : how could I increase mid corner steering ?
-Side question : What is the difference between longer/shorter camber links ?
-Final question : Why are their more people using anti-dive in front these days ? What does it do ?

Thank you very much

I add one more question:

Why are almost all pro drivers are not using guards that prevent lipo is out of place? In all cars, Tamiya, Xray, Yokomo,...

TKS
WinDarK83 is offline  
Old 02-13-2011, 07:16 AM
  #705  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
Vicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,060
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

I also race my 417 yesturday,, TQ and won the spec stock class.
may even have set the fastest lap time for spec.. I drove the 416x then the
417 I set the 417 up just like the 416x and the 417 was easyer and faster
with the same body and tires.. This car only thing I need is less steering into an turn and more out of the turn on power. but the car is great to drive
Vicko is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.